Yet another reason why Austin blows goats
By Archie Leach
> > My point, which sailed over your head, is
> > not that "that's rich" isn't proper English, or
> > out of context; but simply, that it's
> > pretentious. You may now get on with your
> > life.
>
> and just WHAT is "not proper" about it??
R e a d i n g . I s . F u n d a m e n t a l ( $ 1 )
> For example... in the context of describing a
> cake mix... one can justifiably say "that's rich"
> as a means of correctly describing the
> content!
>
> I could go on but what IS the point in trying to
> explain English to a yank??
Now _THAT'S_ rich!
(That's not a compliment, by the way.)
Archie Leach
Live, from Lansing, Michigan
*****************************
How stupid is Stupid Richard Bullis???
From: Richard <Richa...@msn.com>
Newsgroups: 24hoursupport.helpdesk
Date: Tuesday, March 30, 1999 6:56 AM
Subject: Goodbye
[...]
When I first entered the world of the newsgroups I was checking out
certain areas of interest. And a few groups just to see what they were
all about. For instance, just how much kiddy porn was available on this
usenet as I had heard about on the news.
By Archie Leach
> In the case of the USA, it's called "abusing it",
> just ask Evelyn Waugh, or Oscar Wilde,
Uh, it might be hard to ask Evelyn Waugh or Oscar Wilde anything right
at this moment, though it might be fair to say that your sense of humour
is even deader.
> or the English, or me for that matter.
It's a good thing most Australians aren't such complete and utterly
pretentious jackasses such as yourself.
Granted, for every one prissy Roo-fucker intellectual, there's at least
a hundred con-spawn Foster's-guzzling gap-toothed Cockneys wishing they
could be cool just like an English football hoodlum.........
What a world.
By Archie Leach
> You know nothing about me and whether I am
> pretentious or not.
>
> Is there anyone more ignorant than someone
> who makes assumptions about others based
> on one word?
Only someone who, in asking if there is anyone more ignorant than
someone who makes assumptions about others based on one word, makes an
assumption about others based on the word "pretentious".....
By Archie Leach
> You replied with this innane comment:
Nice job of butchering up the English language, eh Lowery?
> `Is there anything more pretentious than
> someone who says "that´s rich" when talking
> about something other than the dessert?´
>
> > You suggest that I don't "have a clue about
> > cultural differences in the use of language,
> > especially colloquialisms and the
> > vernacular"
> > without knowing my background in
> > anthropology,
>
> And now that I know it, I maintain that you
> don't have a clue, or are yet to demonstrate
> that you do.
Damned if that's the most INNANE thing I've read all day!!!!!
> If you did, then perhaps you
> would have recognised that the poster came
> from another country. There is nothing
> pretentious about the use of the word "rich"
> on the given context, in this country, or many
> others.
Um, but what happens in your country, or "many others", is fucking
irrelevant.
What part of this do you fail to understand?
Ian Lowery
That brain dead moron, stuco...@webtv.net (By Archie Leach)
indulged in a style typical to the brain dead, of jumping on typos and
of coming out with a set of ill thought out one liners masquerading as
rational thought, but having much more in common with premature
ejaculation, a state about which he is no doubt all too familiar, and
a state with which I admit I am totally unfamiliar, my knowledge of it
having come from medical literature.
>Um, but what happens in your country, or "many others", is fucking
>irrelevant.
That statement is typical of one of the most odious creatures on the
planet, loud mouthed Yanks. You do much to further the opinion from
around the world which makes the USA a joke in the eyes of many, that
people from the USA are ignorant and parochial.
>What part of this do you fail to understand?
I fail to understand:
1) How you managed to achieve the social graces of you average pig.
Was it by diligence and hard word, was it because you are a victim of
circumstances, or was it thrust upon you because of your breeding, or
lack thereof?
2) Given that you are up yourself, how much further up yourself would
you have to go in order to be completely inside out, and is your being
up yourself the reason for your obviously emotionally harrowing
persistent premature ejaculation?
Ian Lowery
------------------------------------------------
To reply, remove "nospam" from my e-mail address.
By Archie Leach
> That brain dead moron,
> stuco...@webtv.net (By Archie Leach)
> indulged in a style typical to the brain dead, of
> jumping on typos
Do not belittle me. I take my cues from the Master of Typo Pouncing
himself, the immortal Dr. J. Raoul Xemblinosky, PhD, DDS, JD.
> and of coming out with a set of ill thought out
> one liners masquerading as rational thought,
> but having much more in common with
> premature ejaculation,
How can words have anything in common with semen? Semen is a liquid.
Words are abstract entities. Your claim is absurd. Try again, you
insignificant little Koala fucker.
> a state about which he is no doubt all too
> familiar,
Your mom was pretty familiar with my premature ejaculation last night.
Which is to say, there was an awful lot of it in her mouth, and in other
orifices.
Funny how women from irrelevant countries such as Australia just beg on
their hands and knees to fuck a man from a real country--i.e. the United
States of America....
> and a state with which I admit I am totally
> unfamiliar, my knowledge of it having come
> from medical literature.
So you're saying your a male virgin? You sure write like one.
> > Um, but what happens in your country, or
> > "many others", is fucking irrelevant.
>
> That statement is typical of one of the most
> odious creatures on the planet, loud mouthed
> Yanks. You do much to further the opinion
> from around the world which makes the USA
> a joke in the eyes of many, that people from
> the USA are ignorant and parochial.
Oh well. Maybe we'd be better off if we rounded up even more of our
dissidents (a la Peru and the Shining Path) and wired their nuts up to a
car battery...........
>
> > What part of this do you fail to understand?
>
> I fail to understand:
>
> 1) How you managed to achieve the social
> graces of you average pig. Was it by diligence
> and hard word, was it because you are a
> victim of circumstances, or was it thrust upon
> you because of your breeding, or lack
> thereof?
>
> 2) Given that you are up yourself, how much
> further up yourself would you have to go in
> order to be completely inside out, and is your
> being up yourself the reason for your
> obviously emotionally harrowing persistent
> premature ejaculation?
You seem to be obsessed with the concept of ejaculation.
Perhaps this is symptomatic of men who come from F*CKING IRRELEVANT
COUNTRIES SUCH AS AUSTRALIA.