Tandberg 'Natural Audio Module'?
John
conjunction with teleconferencing systems but haven't been able to
find a user handbook/spec sheet. If it's an amplifier it may have
possibilities.
Tandberg Model TTC 1-01 Natural Audio Module II
Thanks,
John
Phil Allison
"John"
** Ring Cisco Systems in North Sydney tomorrow.
Tandberg now looks very much to be an "office equipment " line exclusive to
one supplier with no outsiders welcome.
Remember when they used to make R-R tape decks ?
.... Phil
Phil Allison
"John"
** It's a powered speaker system, made in Norway:
.... Phil
karma dogma
wrote:
>>
>> Tandberg
>
> Remember when they used to make R-R tape decks ?
>
>
>
>.... Phil
>
>
>
>
And very very ordinary ones at that.
Phil Allison
"karma dogma"
"Phil Allison"
>>
>>> Tandberg
>>
>> Remember when they used to make R-R tape decks ?
>
** They invented " Cross Field " bias - as made famous by Akai in their
R-R machines.
For a short time back in the early 80s, I was obliged to fix the odd
Tandberg R-R deck.
One time, I spent hours chasing non-existent electronic fault only to
discover at length that it was caused an exquisitely well hidden mechanical
one.
If I never see one again, it will be too soon.
..... Phil
karma dogma
wrote:
>
X field bias, in theory, with the extreme mechanical limitations of a
poorly pressed metal design sort of was a good compromise. (in the
case of Tandberg)
I was doing them in the mid 70's and still feel scarred. :-)
Don't let anyone talk about the halcyon days of analog tape (even
Kudelski!!) - or even any tape transport system......
Phil Allison
"karma dogma"
>>"karma dogma"
>> "Phil Allison"
>>>
>>>> Remember when they used to make R-R tape decks ?
>>>
>>> And very very ordinary ones at that.
>>
>>
>>** They invented " Cross Field " bias - as made famous by Akai in their
>>R-R machines.
>>
>>For a short time back in the early 80s, I was obliged to fix the odd
>>Tandberg R-R deck.
>>
>>One time, I spent hours chasing non-existent electronic fault only to
>>discover at length that it was caused an exquisitely well hidden
>>mechanical
>>one.
>>
>>If I never see one again, it will be too soon.
>
>>
> poorly pressed metal design sort of was a good compromise. (in the
> case of Tandberg)
> I was doing them in the mid 70's and still feel scarred. :-)
> Don't let anyone talk about the halcyon days of analog tape (even
> Kudelski!!) - or even any tape transport system......
** I could never figure the fascination so many hi-fi fools had for R-R
decks and cassette recorders - or the mindless awe in which brands like
Nakamichi and Pioneer were held by them.
No identifiable basis in reality EVER existed for it.
Far as I could see, a serious hi-fi system needed a tape deck in the same
way a fish needs a bicycle ....
.... Phil
John
Thanks for the Tandberg/Cisco link, Phil. As for the 'If I never see
one again, it will be too soon.' comment, I feel the same way about
process gas analysers.
John
Phil Allison
"John"
"Phil Allison"
Thanks for the Tandberg/Cisco link, Phil. As for the 'If I never see
one again, it will be too soon.' comment, I feel the same way about
process gas analysers.
** What a shame I answered the obscure question too ....
... Phil
Bruce Varley
"Phil Allison" <phi...@tpg.com.au> wrote in message
news:8u912...@mid.individual.net...
or borrowed vinyls. OK, the fidelity wasn't all that hot, but it was the
best available.
I'd like a dollar for every time I saw a r-r owner reaching for the cotton
bud packet and the head cleaner in frustration.