Google Groups no longer supports new Usenet posts or subscriptions. Historical content remains viewable.
Dismiss

triac Identification.

323 views
Skip to first unread message

Benjamin Richards

unread,
Jun 15, 2002, 6:45:19 AM6/15/02
to

I am trying to source some information on a triac that has come out of my
gas heater.
The dead beastie is a TLC221T. I have done a search through the web and the
likely retailers and nothing shows. Does any body have any specs on this
device so as i can obtain a suitable replacement.

Thanks in advance.
Ben R


Alan Liefting

unread,
Jun 15, 2002, 7:00:37 AM6/15/02
to
Have you tried the service agents for that particular brand?

--
________________________

Alan Liefting
78 Flockton Street
St Albans
Christchurch
New Zealand

Telephone: (03)385-3830
Facsimile: (03)385-3830
________________________

Vote GREENS for a better future!
http://www.greens.org.nz

Phil Allison

unread,
Jun 15, 2002, 7:31:49 AM6/15/02
to

"Benjamin Richards" <bena...@myplace.net.au> wrote in message
news:aef5rl$7r4$1...@yeppa.connect.com.au...

** Triacs are all very simialar so you could try a standard type like
the 8 and 10 amp ones from DSE.


Regards, Phil


Marc

unread,
Jun 15, 2002, 7:39:57 AM6/15/02
to
V(drm) Max 400V
I(TRMS) Max 1.0A
Max Gate Trigger Current 5.0mA
Max Gate Trigger Voltage 1.5V
t(gt) Typ. 3.0uS
-40 to 110 deg C Junction Temp
Package TO-221var

Pinouts, looking at identifying marks on front,
legs facing down

left middle right
MT1 MT2 G


"Benjamin Richards" <bena...@myplace.net.au> wrote in message
news:aef5rl$7r4$1...@yeppa.connect.com.au...
>

Joseph Goldburg

unread,
Jun 15, 2002, 9:32:57 PM6/15/02
to
Hi B,

I think it is an ST or SGS Brand.

Does it look like a TO-220 packge with the top tab cut off?

I think Philips have something similar but in a TO-220 package BT13.....
brand.

Regard
JG

"Benjamin Richards" <bena...@myplace.net.au> wrote in message
news:aef5rl$7r4$1...@yeppa.connect.com.au...
>

Benjamin Richards

unread,
Jun 16, 2002, 7:55:54 AM6/16/02
to
Thanks to all who have replied both through the group and directly.
I believe i have the info that i require to source a suitable replacement.
if not i'll be right back.
I initally tried a TRIAC that i had in my spare bits bucket (SC141D) and it
didn't work (yes it tested it prior to installing it) so i was kinda worried
that it was something really exotic. The service agent don't work W/E so i'm
going to give them a call tomorrow to see if they carry the part. I'll
probably have to buy a whole board from them. (ouch!)
Anaging thanks to all that replied
Regards
Ben R.


Benjamin Richards <bena...@myplace.net.au> wrote in message
news:aef5rl$7r4$1...@yeppa.connect.com.au...
>

Message has been deleted

Phil Allison

unread,
Jun 16, 2002, 11:47:46 PM6/16/02
to

"Ross Herbert" <rher...@bigpond.net.au> wrote in message
news:3D0D5116...@bigpond.net.au...
> Benjamin,
>
> Firstly, check that the type is a TIC221 and not a TLC...Is it a metal
> case stud mounted type? If it is then it should be a 6A device.
>
> The suffix T usually indicates the PIV but if it really is a TIC221T
> then I don't have that info. My references only list suffix A - E with E
> being 500V. Depending upon the circuit it is in it could be a 1000V
> type, but that is a guess. Sometimes, new suffixes were added after the
> initial voltage range designators had been determined, and a PIV lower
> than that for the A might be a T or something else.
>
> The TIC designation was used by Texas Instruments back in the 1960's -
> 70's and beyond for SCR's and triacs. They use the TLC designation
> currently for op-amps.
>
> Rgds,
>
> Ross Herbert


** Yes , the number looks wrong to me to. If only people would realise
that the part number alone is NOT enough to get data on a device. One needs
the brand name, (or logo description) package type, some idea of the age and
the application.

These are all known to the OP but for some god knows what reason most
elect to keep them secret.


Regards, Phil


Message has been deleted

Phil Allison

unread,
Jun 17, 2002, 1:42:08 AM6/17/02
to

"Ross Herbert" <rher...@bigpond.net.au> wrote in message
news:3D0D7287...@bigpond.net.au...

> ** Triacs are all very simialar so you could try a standard type
like
> > the 8 and 10 amp ones from DSE.
> >
> > Regards, Phil

>
> Phil,
>
> I'm sorry to have a go at you but you did say in your last response on
> the 2SA671 saga that;
>
> "I try never to assume things. It always comes back to bite you."
>
> Were you not assuming that this device had to be a TO220 or similar
> style device when you said "Triacs are all very similar"? Certainly,
> they are in their theory of operation, but as for ratings and physical
> mounting arrangement, they can be very different. While it may be
> possible to fudge a TO220 type "like the 8A and 10A ones from DSE" in
> place of a stud mount type, this would be the exception rather than the
> norm -:)

** You have me "bang to rights" there Ross.

I am 100% guilty of assuming the OP was not blind.

Please see my other post here for a big whinge about posters giving
only the damn part number and no description of the device. Of course that
must now be ammended to exclude blind persons. Shame shame.


Regards, Phil


Message has been deleted

Phil Allison

unread,
Jun 17, 2002, 2:41:11 AM6/17/02
to

"Ross Herbert" <rher...@bigpond.net.au> wrote in message
news:3D0D7891...@bigpond.net.au...


** Just in case there is any misunderatanding here Ross, the reasons for
wanting a device description are no small matter.


1. The brand name along with the application and device age tells me what
maker's data book to pull out and which edition.

2. The package and device function tells me what section to look in.

3. The part number with all prefixes and suffixes gets me down to the
actual page and raw data.

4. Using that data and knowing the application a possible substitute can
be suggested.


If some DH gives only a part number and then has one letter or digit
wrong he deserves no consideration at all in my book.

Unless, of course he/she is blind.

Funny thing, I haven't ever met a blind electronics tech.


Regards, Phil

Benjamin Richards

unread,
Jun 17, 2002, 6:50:04 AM6/17/02
to
Phil
Yes the Prefix is correct it is a TLC221T. i must appoligise about not
posting the package type with my original post. Having said that, There is
NO need to flame me. As for the Prefix ... give me some credit.
Ben R.

Phil Allison <bi...@bigpond.com> wrote in message
news:NQcP8.13782$Hj3....@newsfeeds.bigpond.com...

Phil Allison

unread,
Jun 17, 2002, 7:13:15 AM6/17/02
to

"Benjamin Richards" <bena...@myplace.net.au> wrote in message
news:aekesj$ijn$1...@yeppa.connect.com.au...

> Phil

> Yes the Prefix is correct it is a TLC221T. i must appoligise about not
> posting the package type with my original post. Having said that, There is
> NO need to flame me. As for the Prefix ... give me some credit.


** Oh come on, nobody flamed you!

BTW You have still not posted the package type.

Can you see a post from "Marc" with all the data? You made no response
to it so maybe your ISP had not got it.

The nearest to that data is the Z0405DF in the Farnell catalogue as
706-085 for $2.60 + gst.

The type is a special sensitive gate one meant to operate from a logic
cct. (a uP maybe)


Regards, Phil


Message has been deleted

Phil Allison

unread,
Jun 18, 2002, 3:52:10 AM6/18/02
to

"Ross Herbert" <rher...@bigpond.net.au> wrote in message
news:3D0EDF27...@bigpond.net.au...

> Thanks for the updated info and confirmation of type number. The data
provided by Marc is apparently correct although he omitted to
> post the max MT1 - MT2 current rating.


** Marc gave the figure of 1 amp rms for this, I(TRMS).


Regards, Phil

Message has been deleted
Message has been deleted

Phil Allison

unread,
Jun 18, 2002, 8:32:52 AM6/18/02
to

"Ross Herbert" <rher...@bigpond.net.au> wrote in message
news:3D0F07EA...@bigpond.net.au...
>
> Phil,
>
> Yes, you are right - must have overlooked it as a mis-type since 1.0A is
> awfully low for a TO220 or even a TO202 device and well within the
> capability of a TO92 (eg, TICP206D). Since I can't locate any actual
> data for it I won't dispute this figure however a current rating of 4.0
> A and up is more usual for a TO220 case.
\

** The triac the OP was interested in is one darn obscure device in a
strange package. It appears to be obsolete and all traces of its existance
removed from the web. It has become a "non triac" if you follow my drift ;-)


Regards, Phil


Brian Goldsmith

unread,
Jun 19, 2002, 8:27:12 AM6/19/02
to
Phil wrote:-)

The triac the OP was interested in is one darn obscure device in a
strange package. It appears to be obsolete and all traces of its existance
removed from the web.

*******Removed from the web perhaps but not from a trusty old DATA book.:-


TRIAC TLC221T MAX.REP.OFF STATE VOLTAGE, 400 VDRM.MAX RMS CURRENT, 1.0
AMP. MAX.MAX.GATE FIRING CHAR. 1st QUADRANT ,5mA @VGT 3.0VOLTS.
OUTLINE DRAWING ,MU166.

Nothing magic about this device!!!!
Brian Goldsmith.


Phil Allison

unread,
Jun 19, 2002, 8:54:09 AM6/19/02
to

"Brian Goldsmith" <brian.g...@nospamecho1.com.au> wrote in message
news:AM_P8.332054$o66.8...@news-server.bigpond.net.au...

OK, Marc gave similar data. But what does the package look like?


Regards, Phil

Franc Zabkar

unread,
Jun 19, 2002, 5:46:48 PM6/19/02
to
On Sat, 15 Jun 2002 18:45:19 +0800, "Benjamin Richards"
<bena...@myplace.net.au> put finger to keyboard and composed:

NTE's cross reference page suggests that their NTE5629 is a match:

http://www.nteinc.com/specs/5600to5699/pdf/nte5629.pdf

Search here:
http://nte01.nteinc.com/nte/NTExRefSemiProd.nsf/$$Search?OpenForm


-- Franc Zabkar

Please remove the 'g' from my address when replying by email.

Message has been deleted
Message has been deleted
Message has been deleted

Franc Zabkar

unread,
Jun 20, 2002, 2:05:25 AM6/20/02
to
On Thu, 20 Jun 2002 00:35:51 GMT, Ross Herbert
<rher...@bigpond.net.au> put finger to keyboard and composed:

>Frank, I gave the information re NTE cross in my first post of last
>Tuesday.

Sorry, I seem to be having problems with my ISP. I posted two messages
last Monday, one to aus.electronics, another to comp.dcom.modems, but
neither has surfaced in my news feed. I also can't find them in the
Google archives.

Brian Goldsmith

unread,
Jun 20, 2002, 4:37:57 AM6/20/02
to

"Ross Herbert" <rher...@bigpond.net.au> wrote in message >
I don't think anyone was saying there is anything "magic" -----if you can
describe the outline drawing MU166 then we might be a little
more informed about it.

*******Imagine a TO220 package with the heatsink removed,that's about the
size of a TLC2215.Leadout is (L-R) ,M1,M2,G.
Nothing magic about this,bog standard!!
Brian Goldsmith.


0 new messages