Thanks in advance.
Ben R
--
________________________
Alan Liefting
78 Flockton Street
St Albans
Christchurch
New Zealand
Telephone: (03)385-3830
Facsimile: (03)385-3830
________________________
Vote GREENS for a better future!
http://www.greens.org.nz
** Triacs are all very simialar so you could try a standard type like
the 8 and 10 amp ones from DSE.
Regards, Phil
Pinouts, looking at identifying marks on front,
legs facing down
left middle right
MT1 MT2 G
"Benjamin Richards" <bena...@myplace.net.au> wrote in message
news:aef5rl$7r4$1...@yeppa.connect.com.au...
>
I think it is an ST or SGS Brand.
Does it look like a TO-220 packge with the top tab cut off?
I think Philips have something similar but in a TO-220 package BT13.....
brand.
Regard
JG
"Benjamin Richards" <bena...@myplace.net.au> wrote in message
news:aef5rl$7r4$1...@yeppa.connect.com.au...
>
Benjamin Richards <bena...@myplace.net.au> wrote in message
news:aef5rl$7r4$1...@yeppa.connect.com.au...
>
** Yes , the number looks wrong to me to. If only people would realise
that the part number alone is NOT enough to get data on a device. One needs
the brand name, (or logo description) package type, some idea of the age and
the application.
These are all known to the OP but for some god knows what reason most
elect to keep them secret.
Regards, Phil
> ** Triacs are all very simialar so you could try a standard type
like
> > the 8 and 10 amp ones from DSE.
> >
> > Regards, Phil
>
> Phil,
>
> I'm sorry to have a go at you but you did say in your last response on
> the 2SA671 saga that;
>
> "I try never to assume things. It always comes back to bite you."
>
> Were you not assuming that this device had to be a TO220 or similar
> style device when you said "Triacs are all very similar"? Certainly,
> they are in their theory of operation, but as for ratings and physical
> mounting arrangement, they can be very different. While it may be
> possible to fudge a TO220 type "like the 8A and 10A ones from DSE" in
> place of a stud mount type, this would be the exception rather than the
> norm -:)
** You have me "bang to rights" there Ross.
I am 100% guilty of assuming the OP was not blind.
Please see my other post here for a big whinge about posters giving
only the damn part number and no description of the device. Of course that
must now be ammended to exclude blind persons. Shame shame.
Regards, Phil
** Just in case there is any misunderatanding here Ross, the reasons for
wanting a device description are no small matter.
1. The brand name along with the application and device age tells me what
maker's data book to pull out and which edition.
2. The package and device function tells me what section to look in.
3. The part number with all prefixes and suffixes gets me down to the
actual page and raw data.
4. Using that data and knowing the application a possible substitute can
be suggested.
If some DH gives only a part number and then has one letter or digit
wrong he deserves no consideration at all in my book.
Unless, of course he/she is blind.
Funny thing, I haven't ever met a blind electronics tech.
Regards, Phil
Phil Allison <bi...@bigpond.com> wrote in message
news:NQcP8.13782$Hj3....@newsfeeds.bigpond.com...
> Phil
> Yes the Prefix is correct it is a TLC221T. i must appoligise about not
> posting the package type with my original post. Having said that, There is
> NO need to flame me. As for the Prefix ... give me some credit.
** Oh come on, nobody flamed you!
BTW You have still not posted the package type.
Can you see a post from "Marc" with all the data? You made no response
to it so maybe your ISP had not got it.
The nearest to that data is the Z0405DF in the Farnell catalogue as
706-085 for $2.60 + gst.
The type is a special sensitive gate one meant to operate from a logic
cct. (a uP maybe)
Regards, Phil
> Thanks for the updated info and confirmation of type number. The data
provided by Marc is apparently correct although he omitted to
> post the max MT1 - MT2 current rating.
** Marc gave the figure of 1 amp rms for this, I(TRMS).
Regards, Phil
** The triac the OP was interested in is one darn obscure device in a
strange package. It appears to be obsolete and all traces of its existance
removed from the web. It has become a "non triac" if you follow my drift ;-)
Regards, Phil
*******Removed from the web perhaps but not from a trusty old DATA book.:-
TRIAC TLC221T MAX.REP.OFF STATE VOLTAGE, 400 VDRM.MAX RMS CURRENT, 1.0
AMP. MAX.MAX.GATE FIRING CHAR. 1st QUADRANT ,5mA @VGT 3.0VOLTS.
OUTLINE DRAWING ,MU166.
Nothing magic about this device!!!!
Brian Goldsmith.
OK, Marc gave similar data. But what does the package look like?
Regards, Phil
NTE's cross reference page suggests that their NTE5629 is a match:
http://www.nteinc.com/specs/5600to5699/pdf/nte5629.pdf
Search here:
http://nte01.nteinc.com/nte/NTExRefSemiProd.nsf/$$Search?OpenForm
-- Franc Zabkar
Please remove the 'g' from my address when replying by email.
>Frank, I gave the information re NTE cross in my first post of last
>Tuesday.
Sorry, I seem to be having problems with my ISP. I posted two messages
last Monday, one to aus.electronics, another to comp.dcom.modems, but
neither has surfaced in my news feed. I also can't find them in the
Google archives.
*******Imagine a TO220 package with the heatsink removed,that's about the
size of a TLC2215.Leadout is (L-R) ,M1,M2,G.
Nothing magic about this,bog standard!!
Brian Goldsmith.