On 7/11/2011 3:56 PM, David Clayton wrote:
> On Mon, 07 Nov 2011 08:24:48 +1100, B J Foster wrote:
>
>> "The Australian Drinking Water Guidelines states that atrazine should not
>> be in drinking water.
>>
>> The APVMA have repeatedly stated that atrazine contamination is not a
>> *real* issue as *most* Australians do not drink groundwater and only drink
>> from protected water catchments; this is obviously incorrect for the whole
>> of Tasmania (and most of Australia)".
>>
http://www.tasmaniantimes.com/index.php/article/the-growing-atrazine-scandal
>>
>> Spot the fob-off.
> .........
> An August 2009 article that somehow is news right now?
That article is relevant right *now* because nothing has changed:
1. Atrazine is still widely used
2. Atrazine is still suspected of being carcinogeneic
3. Atrazine is still banned in the EU - and allowed in Australia
4. The APVMA has not changed their position *despite* the fact that most
bottled water *still* comes from groundwater
Conclusion:
It is still the case that this government department doesn't give a shit
about people who drink bottled water.
Should an issue cease to have interest because a government department
DID NOTHING about it in 2 years?
>
> Yep, pity the "gubbermint" - and the rest of the idiots who bag any
> environmental control - don't listen to those pesky Greens who are
> always against this sort of stuff, eh?
>
Pity the population, assailed with crap like 'carbon' tax when there are
*real* life-threatening issues out there - like atrazine.
Or better still, ask Peter Garrett about hexachlorobenzene (HCB)
contaminating his constituency, planned to be cleaned up by Labor since
1995.
http://www.oricabotanytransformation.com/index.asp?page=87&project=83
Not news - still polluting Kingsford-Smith, still threatening peoples'
lives - yet all we ever hear about is the non-problem called 'global
warming'. Labor idiots.