On Sun, 11 Feb 2024 06:07:02 +1100, "Rod Speed"
<
rod.sp...@gmail.com> wrote:
>On Sat, 10 Feb 2024 17:09:53 +1100, Petzl <
pet...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
>> On Sat, 10 Feb 2024 15:26:45 +1100, "Rod Speed"
>> <
rod.sp...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>
>>> On Sat, 10 Feb 2024 14:55:03 +1100, Petzl <
pet...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> What do you mean by that ?
>>>
>>>> Where say a Samsung can't get a signal Moto can and clearly
>>>
>>> I just don't believe that that phone is the best android.
>
>> Those doing advertisements for them might!
>
>Who cares ?
>
Those who PSYOP peoples thinking like yours Rod!
>
>> But I never said that, what I said was it is the top *Android* for
>> receiving calls, hearing them and transmitting calls, other party
>> hearing you, you hearing them clearly.
>
>That's bullshit and I just abbreviated what
>you said. No point in repeating all that.
>
In reality I can get signal when others can't Rod why is that you
think?
>
>> Samsung are more interested in providingfluff like reality glasses,
>> photo's and such.
>
>More bullshit.
>
Bought 1 Samsung never again. Their present adverts are promoting,
gaming, photo's and videos, not signal reception.
My Kiwi mate confirms this and he is much more tech savvy than even
you Rod and he don't "bullshit" ever.
>
>> My Moto photo's are adequate
>>
https://ibb.co/KyNJrv3
>> Local Golf club after lunch yesterday and a few beers (no flash)
>
>I used to think that, but now that I am using tiktok
>I do prefer the much higher quality videos.
>
As a photographer I admit I stink nut not seen a better photo than my
Moto takes, this was without flash full depth of field, no dark spots
https://ibb.co/KyNJrv3
>
>>>>>> of all Android phones, the only one found 2% better is the latest
>>>>>> Iphone.
>>>
>>>>> Who decided that.
>>>
>>>> Can't now find it, was a overseas Choice type magazine UK I believe
>>>
>>> Which, which has a pathetic reputation for getting anything right.
>
>> Not according to those manufacturers who don't like the truth
>> Choice magazine
>
>We aren't discussing Choice, we are
>discussing the UK equivalent, Which.
>
Not sure, Choice I believe, don't see why the UK equivalent would be
different?
>
>> once did a check on cat food, they found at thetime the best was the
>> Aldi and the cheapest.
>> The others were slowly killing them.
>> That did not go down well at all.
>
>>> And I just don't believe that its true of all phone bands either.
>>>
>>>> But seems confirmable here My neighbour with his Iphone often has to
>>>> go outside for Telstra reception (I couldn't with my Samsung on
>>>> Telstra but could with MyAmasim not well) No troubles with my 2021
>>>> "Moto g 5G plus"
>>>
>>> What phone band.
>
>> mine? Samsung N7100 expensive crap
>
>I was talking about the phone BAND, not BRAND.
>
Sent you a link in last message
>>>>>> Very pleased with mine
>>>>>
>>>>> So its not a great idea if your charger kills it.
>>>>>
>>>>>> thanks to "Jonz"
https://t.ly/BdPKP
>>>>>
>>>>>> I bought a new "Moto g 5G plus" on Ebay auction($200 snipe) for a
>>>>>> Kiwi
>>>>>> friend of mine who livesin the bush on the West Coast near
>>>>>> Greymouth.
>>>>>> His reaction to me asking if any problems
>>>>>> "Nah she's perfect"
>>>>>
>> Snip for the kiddies
>>>
>>>>>> Also he can pickup and send (hear and speak) better with clearervoice
>>>>>> than anyone else nearby (mostly Farmers with new Iphones)who are
>>>>>> impressed by it the area mobile towers are few and far).
>>>>>
>>>>> So its not a great idea to use a charger that can
>>>>> kill it because it hasnt been designed properly.
>>>
>>>> Any charger can maybe do that,
>>>
>>> Nope. The best designs are designed to fail safe,
>>> never deliver more voltage than the phone needs
>>> no matter how the charger fails. They do that with
>>> a proper optical isolator.
>
>> Why would this one be?
>
>So the charger doesnt kill what
>is being charged if it dies.
>
NEVER had that happen ever?
Don't believe it will happen with my 30 port USB charger
>
>> Been using chargers for age's, The only ones that played up were for
>> AA/AAA batteries but never caused fires or smoke.
>
>Doesnt matter if those kill the battery if they fail, stupid.
>
NEVER had that happen ever?
>
>> Any how My charging/data cable stops any over charging
>
>The cable does nothing except allows the electricity
>to get from the charger to the device, stupid.
>
Mine has a current regulator going into phones USB C charging port.
>> but you didn't believe that either?
>
>Because you don't have a clue about how USB chargers work.
>
Yes I do been using them snce the first were made.
>
>>>> but never yet had a USB charger do so.
>>>
>>> Others have. You are what is technically known
>>> as a pathetically inadequate sample.
>
>> You though are a adequate sample?
>
>Never said that. I wasnt the one silly enough to claim
>that what I personaly have seen proves a damned thing.
>
>> Have a lot of tech savvy mates
>
>But don't have a fucking clue about how USB chargers work.
>
Yes I do been using them snce the first were made.
>
>> SNIP
>>>>>> on my computer, it backs up my phone all contacts to Gmail
>>>>>
>>>>> Makes a lot more sense to backup everything using wifi.
>>>
>>>> ? mine does it automatically, the Samsung didn't.
>>>
>>> Which Samsung ?
>>>
>> Samsung Galaxy Note II N7100
>>
https://www.gsmarena.com/samsung_galaxy_note_ii_n7100-4854.php
>>>
>>>>>> If I reset it comes back exactly as I set it up,
>>>
>>>>> Any half way decent phone can do that.
>>>
>>>> Well this one does perfectly with other Android mobiles
>>>> Don't know if Android and Iphone are compatable
>>>
>>> That has nothing to do with compatability, it happens over wifi.
>>>
>> Yes
>> But would Iphone saved data also configure to a Android phone and vice
>> versa?
>> My Windows phone would not!
>
>Your Moto doesnt do iphones.
>
Probably not, do iphones dp Android?
--
Petzl
There are two ways to be fooled. One is to believe what isn't true;
the other is to refuse to believe what is true.
- Soren Kierkegaard