If it has a WAN port, it isn't a range extender. My extender has only 4
ethernet ports for attachment to devices like computers, etc. No WAN
port in sight since it doesn't need it. The extender connects via Wifi
to my internet router. I can connect any Wifi device to either my rouer
or my extender. A WAN port is pointless on the extender. The whole idea
is to extend the range of your Wifi signal *without* ethernet cables and
similar. The fact that my extender also has 4 accessible lan ports is a
bonus since I can also connect non wifi enabled devices to it at that
location.
> it could be made to work in reverse, ie. receive wifi from the modem,
> and send the signal out the network socket via cable to the foxbox. but
> this is getting too complicated for my limited knowledge. guess I should
If your extender really is an extender, the process should be simple,
almost automatic. I will admit, that was why I bought a *Netgear*
extender, I have a Netgear router and they talk to each other via Wifi
without issue.
> just get a powerline adapter. except I have sooo much stuff plugged in
> I'm afraid it wont work.
>
They have their limitations. Slow for one unless you buy an expensive
unit. I have a pair here and they languish in a cupboard. I find the
extender more useful and I was using it on a TV box in the lounge for a
time. Now it resides in a spare room and rebroadcasts my wifi to an area
where the Wifi signal is a tad iffish. Works nicely.