On 3/06/2021 2:41 pm, Xeno wrote:
> On 3/6/21 12:00 am, Clocky wrote:
>> On 2/06/2021 6:19 pm, Falscher Bruce wrote:
>>> On Wednesday, June 2, 2021 at 2:00:08 PM UTC+8, Clocky wrote:
>>>>>
>>>> LOL, yeah but the Haltech is the only thing of value and it's
>>>> completely
>>>> wasted on a 95 Mira in any event.
>>> On the other hand, if you want to learn ECU tweaking, put it on a
>>> 3-cylinder shitbox. If you blow up the powertrain, it's no great loss
>>>
>>
>> That's true but OTOH you could do the same on an old Buick powered
>> Commodore and actually see and feel a difference and actually have
>> something fun to drive instead of that horrible little shit box.
>
> Or you could just go out and buy one of these;
>
>
https://www.uniquecarsandparts.com.au/car_info_daihatsu_charade_turbo
>
> They were very fast, beaten only by the Nissan Pulsar EXA. I have driven
> plenty of the NA 3 cylinder 1 litre Charades and they were quite
> reasonable.
NA ones were dog slow and suffered from premature clutch failure en
masse at 40-60,000km. I would line them up - drive (or pushed) onto the
hoist, pull shafts, R/R gearbox, replace clutch and back together back
in the parking lot ready for the next one in 25 minutes flat.
Cleaned up big on bonuses.
They also had an idle issue caused by a faulty idle solenoid. That was
an easy fix though.
The Nissan EXA is one early turbo beast I have had
> experience with back in 1984, it was near new and it was damn fast,
> scary fast. Apparently the turbo charade wasn't all that far behind in
> the performance stakes. That said, the EXA had a 1.5 litre 4 cylinder
> engine so one could expect it to be faster, especially given the power
> to weight advantage.
>
The four cylinder Charades were a pretty good little bus.