On 6/11/2023 11:36 am, Noddy wrote:
> On 6/11/2023 10:16 am, Mighty Mouse wrote:
>
>> also he doesn't appreciate the concept of exaggeration for effect. but
>> then such things are beyond his concrete mind.
>
> "Exaggerating for effect" Felix? You mean like *bullshitting*? :)
No Darren, bullshitting is what *you do*!
>
> Do you mean all those claims Clasener makes about me which remain
> totally unsupported by anything but you believe to be true regardless,
My claims are supported by the government archives and databases Darren.
The archives are *public access*, even you could go down there and check
for yourself. You won't of course, since you know there's *nothing to
see* there!
> and all the lies he's told that he's been caught out *numerous* times
> that you say not one word about in protest?
>
> Do you mean *that* kind of "exaggeration for effect" Felix?
Nah, he means the kind of exaggeration where you have a job as a TA or
cleaner at the airport and you exaggerate it right up to an AME
apprenticeship. Of course the *effect* you desired by doing that was to
gain the admiration of your peers *in a newsgroup*! FFS! Such a pity you
tripped up on the details, liars always do, details only a *signed up
apprentice* could possibly know - like 4 years at TAFE instead of the 3
you mistakenly thought an AME apprenticeship entailed. Didn't know that
the entry level was year *10* passes, not year 9, so you weren't even in
the race with your self admitted failed (DNS) year 9.
>
> Fucking idiot..... :)
>
You are. The more you tripped up on the basics, the more it became
obvious that none of your apprenticeship and trade qualification claims
were true. Most people here wouldn't pick up on those slip ups but, as a
*qualified* mechanic and a qualified Victorian TAFE teacher in
Automotive, I was perfectly placed to call out all your claims, and I
did so. Stump up the proof, I said, and all you have ever done since is
run away! If any of your claims were based on truth, the easiest way to
shoot me down would be to stump up a trade qualification or two. And you
know you would love to be able to do that! But you come up with all
sorts of excuses not to do that, none of which have any validity
whatsoever. As I have oft stated, you can't stump up what you don't have.
BTW, I am not making *claims* when I say you aren't any kind of
tradesman and have never done any apprenticeship ever, I am making
*statements of fact* and these are backed up by the archives at PROV,
the trade registration database and the illegality of doing *multiple*
apprenticeships back to back prior to 1992, after which date the
relevant laws were repealed. The statements of fact can be verified by
research at PROV (by any member of the public), a public request to the
trade registration database, or a search of Victoria's Hansard for 1992
and prior. Therein lies all the proof anyone needs to confirm you as the
biggest liar aus.cars has ever seen. Not only are you a liar, you are a
fraud, as Les found out, much to his chagrin.
Remember, any person running a business in Australia, and *publicly
claiming* to be trade qualified*, is *obligated* to provide proof of
said trade qualifications when asked. So, *I'm asking*!