Big airline ready to plug the Ansett gap
David Bromage
members in the launch of an offshoot as a third Australian carrier.
Delegates from a conference in Shanghai of Star Alliance airlines
indicated that the job could go to Singapore Airlines or possibly Air
New Zealand.
http://www.smh.com.au/articles/2002/06/02/1022982650735.html
[Air New Zealand already had a domestic airline operating in
Australia. It was called Ansett.]
Trevor Fenn
<ca7386a3.02060...@posting.google.com>:
Well ANZ would certainly get the public support :)
--
Trevor Fenn
To Email me add an extra green to the address above.
"Then conquer we must, when our cause it is just"
The Star Spangled Banner
Francis Scott Key
Jason Backshall
"Trevor Fenn" <A@b.c> wrote in message news:9221DA...@209.249.90.101...
> dbro...@omni.com.au (David Bromage) wrote in
> <ca7386a3.02060...@posting.google.com>:
>
> >The world's largest airlines group is close to backing one of its
> >members in the launch of an offshoot as a third Australian carrier.
> >Delegates from a conference in Shanghai of Star Alliance airlines
> >indicated that the job could go to Singapore Airlines or possibly Air
> >New Zealand.
> >
> >http://www.smh.com.au/articles/2002/06/02/1022982650735.html
> >
> >[Air New Zealand already had a domestic airline operating in
> >Australia. It was called Ansett.]
> >
>
> Well ANZ would certainly get the public support :)
> --
I doubt it, after the way they handled the Ansett crisis.
I know many an Ansett supporter who would like to see Garry Toomey burn in
hell.
Trevor Fenn
01.iinet.net.au>:
Hence the smiley, it was not a serious comment.
Stealth Pilot
>>
>>
>>
>
>Hence the smiley, it was not a serious comment.
>
>--
>Trevor Fenn
>To Email me add an extra green to the address above.
>
>"Then conquer we must, when our cause it is just"
> The Star Spangled Banner
> Francis Scott Key
the big airline plugging the ansett gap is Qantas.
based on counting the number of aircraft joining finals just above me.
The big Q wins by a long shot ...and in ex ansett whitetails as well!
good on em.
Editor
BTW, when are Virgin going to get to use the erstwhile Ansett terminal in
Perth?
"breach" <mzgyq...@mailexpire.com> wrote in message
news:rPRK8.4421$3t6.1...@ozemail.com.au...
> "Jason Backshall" <lur...@iinet.net.au> wrote in
> news:3cfb20cb$0$25...@echo-01.iinet.net.au:
> > "Trevor Fenn" <A@b.c> wrote in message
> > news:9221DA...@209.249.90.101...
> > I know many an Ansett supporter who would like to see Garry Toomey
> > burn in hell.
>
> in his cheek when he said that :-)
>
> breach
Wee Duncan
> >
> Just a thought Jase, I suspect Trev probably has his tongue
> in his cheek when he said that :-)
>
> breach
Is this interpreter thing for the incomprehensible Trevor Fenn to be
an ongoing role for you breach?
Trevor Fenn
<a2654ca.02061...@posting.google.com>:
Excuse me?
--
Trevor Fenn
There are too many zz's in my email address above.
Take two zz's and email me in the morning.
Wee Duncan
> Excuse me?
Ahhh - there you are.
Simply indicating my dissatisfaction with your alter ego repeatededly
leaping in with his own explanations of the supposed motive for some
of your recent mystifying posts. Somewhat understandable I suppose
since you haven't responded yourself.
And especially (as I've already explained) breach's completely
inaccurate hypothesis of what it was that you really meant in the
China Airline 747 Down thread.
And where I've already suggested you were either wasting our time and
bandwidth or else understood little of actual NTSB investigation
processes.
Oh, and BTW - I'm sure you'll have already noted the number of reports
confirming the accuracy of my initial post in the CA 747 Down thread
which triggered your above response.
But please - if I've misjudged you as a flippant smartarse then go
ahead and dispel these suggestions and perhaps explain just what it
was that you really meant by "And just how many major accident teams
do you think there are?"
Trevor Fenn
>ozzz...@cablespeed.com (Trevor Fenn) wrote in message
Simple, given that SR111 and TWA800 happened within about 200 miles of each
other it stands to reason that the investigation team was sent from the
same NTSB field office thus is likely to consist of the same team members.
There is nothing Conspiratorial about that.
As to why they went to the China crash, the Washington DC office is
probably the closest to China.
Anything else?
Trevor Fenn
Wee Duncan
> >>ahead and dispel these suggestions and perhaps explain just what it
> >>was that you really meant by "And just how many major accident teams
> >>do you think there are?"
> >
> >
> >Simple, given that SR111 and TWA800 happened within about 200 miles of
> >each other it stands to reason that the investigation team was sent from
> >the same NTSB field office thus is likely to consist of the same team
> >members.
> >
> >There is nothing Conspiratorial about that.
> >
> >As to why they went to the China crash, the Washington DC office is
> >probably the closest to China.
> >
> >Anything else?
> >
>
> I assume we've finished?
If you like - since I'm unable to discern anything in your latest
replies to throw any light on your original question above.
But noting that since I had never suggested there was anything
conspiratorial you've obviously misread my intial post on some way.
You don't seem to understand me - and I'm damned if I can fathom what
you were on about so I'll plead to being thick and leave it at that.
If you like :-)
R.Morgan
discussing options
about taking over Ansetts old routes.