RE: CC95
Minoo@Petrofin
Good Question
Refer the next edition of the Pathfinder for the update and chronological history
Scroll down for more.
Any questions? Please feel to ask per return mail.
And I shall be ever willing to oblige.
Minoo
In the meantime, please note that since 3rd March 2016, the Hon’ble Commission has been pleased to expand the benefits and reliefs to include all those other than 37 original complaints, “all those persons who share/have a common interest in the issues raised in the Original/Amended Complaint”.
This is indeed a landmark order especially when EIPL were claiming dismissal of the entire complaint on the grounds that AURA alone have the right to represent the community in respect of their rights over common areas, vide a letter written by Manish Pratik, the then Aura Secretary in November 2015, at the behest of EIPL
2. By way of a teaser, let me update you on the fact that, per Order of 5th April 2016, the original claims of Rs. 30-40 crores (2009 estimates) against the Builder are now anticipated to increase by at least Rs. 85-150 crores, if not more due to the consumer being most grievously “short changed” due to misuse by the OP (Opposite party) of additional FAR without the consent of the allottee for construction of additional flats post the date of 1st sanction.
Incidentally, at the very first pre-admittance hearing in June 2009, the then Presiding Member of the Hon’ble Commission was astute enough to ask us to indicate the deviations if any, from the marketing brochures and/or sanction plans. (And this has come in most useful to us, even though it has taken me 6 years to discover all the deviations!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
And consequent to my stout appeal to seek summary redressal, the Hon’ble Commission has been pleased to admit “additional” documents through an amendment to the original plaint to enlarge the claim from Rs. 30-40 crores by whatever is deemed necessary on the basis of documents that the Builder has till this day, suppressed, and which we have discovered” through the P.N (Public Notice) of 26th August 2015, issued by Noida Authority in respect of the objections to the final completion plans submitted by EIPL.
Need I say more?
Minoo Bhagwagar
18.7.2016
I am sure that you are smart enough to
From: Praveen Sharma [mailto:sharma...@gmail.com]
Sent: Monday, July 18, 2016 1:29 PM
To: Minoo (Petrofin) <mi...@petrofin.com>; eldeco-utopia-s...@yahoogroups.co.in
Subject: CC95
minooji
was with a friend in gurgaon and she told me they had a judgement by ncdrc within 9 months. the case is against unitech for E-space gurgaon. wonder why cc95 is taking so many years.
p
Minoo@Petrofin
Thank you Rajiv.
But, please do pardon my arrogance if I state that you, Sir, are not in touch with the latest developments since October 2015 on CC-95.
Scroll down to the last mail of this communication thread in response to Perry’s trigger mail.
In matters of law, one does not need a crowd of litigants.
I am proud to be in the minority of One.
Since 2011 and till 2016, it is NOT the lone Crusader who is on the back foot.
……but only the Builder who, through deploying senior counsels who, so I am told, demand Rs. 4.00 lakhs per hearing, is using every trick in the rule book, to shield himself, under the garb of specious” technicalities”, to prolong the axe.
Minoo Bhagwagar
Proud to be the Lone Crusader.
From: eldeco-utopia-s...@yahoogroups.co.in [mailto:eldeco-utopia-s...@yahoogroups.co.in] On Behalf Of Rajiv Dubey dubey...@gmail.com [eldeco-utopia-sector-93a-noida]
Sent: Tuesday, July 19, 2016 9:54 AM
To: eldeco-utopia-s...@yahoogroups.co.in
Cc: Minoo (Petrofin) <mi...@petrofin.com>
Subject: [UTOPIA] Re: CC95
I was never a part of CC95, but I think this whole process started on a good note in year 2009, Minoo ji had good intentions, but then he started focusing on picking on people, maligning everyone who questioned anything, started branding people as "builder's lobby" the moment said anything to the contrary.
As a result, the smart people who could have worked together stayed away from being branded as "Minoo's Men".
On the other hand Minoo ji, caught in labyrinth kept going in circles, aimlessly, without support of good people, who could have made a difference...that's why there is no result!
Regards,
Rajiv
PS: I don't know why kids like Nirman are marked on this chain?
On Tue, Jul 19, 2016 at 6:38 AM, Gautam Gode <Gau...@samaracapital.com> wrote:
i had pointed this out in 2008/9 when i was asked to sign the complaint - and at first glance i saw it was so poorly framed.
at that time i had mentioned that with this sort of an amateur show the builder with his experienced legal team can easily "ghumaao" us for decades
however, no one paid any heed to meFrom: Praveen Sharma
Sent: 18/07/2016 15:10
To: Minoo (Petrofin)
Cc: eldeco-utopia-s...@yahoogroups.co.in; Urwag; Rajiv Dubey; Dhananjay Chaturvedi; Capt. Vikas; Pawan Chandra; Gautam Gode; SURESH BAKSHI; anil kapur; nareshkumarias; Vijay Dalmia; Mahendra Garg; Gulshan Kumar Bhatia; Ashish Agrawal; Rishabh Mehrotra; shyam khosla; Romi Mathur; eldeco-utopia-sector-93a-noida] <eldec; Brig Narayan Inder; Anjali Singh; Aman Agarwal (OL-1/2201); Mukesh Aggarwal; Jitendra Nath; Chhavi BAJPAI; Vishal Arora; nirmaan bajpai
Subject: Re: CC95ultimately they have a judgement and we don't. anyway, i got this info and thought of sharing it with the group
