19.7.2016 - RE: CC95
Minoo@Petrofin
Mr Gode, my friend!
Just for the records,
Why do you get a worn out needle stuck on the same old gramophone (HMV?) “record”?
You will, due to obvious reasons, NEVER concede that, when you said that your corporate legal adviser had rejected the draft as amateurish, I had requested you to get it improved.
But, for equally obvious reasons, you and a few others, whom I shared the draft with, merely used the draft to misuse my neighbourly trust in you.
2. YES! You are right when you say that your friend, and our friendly builder, is one of the sharpest rogue elephant in the realty business.
Therefore, Between 2011 and 2016, I, in all humility, confirm having had the privilege of having every strategy vetted by a 4-tier of expert legal law firms
And since then, it is NOT I/we, the consumer, who is on the back foot, but the Opposite Party.
3. In any case, there will be issued today, a formal communication after the same has been vetted by the Law office of Karanjawala and Company.
Rest assured, it will be my pleasure to include you and Perry, in the list of addresses, while sending it out.
Minoo
From: Gautam Gode [mailto:Gau...@samaracapital.com]
Sent: Tuesday, July 19, 2016 6:39 AM
To: Praveen Sharma <sharma...@gmail.com>; Minoo (Petrofin) <mi...@petrofin.com>
Cc: eldeco-utopia-s...@yahoogroups.co.in; Urwag <ur...@googlegroups.com>; Rajiv Dubey <dubey...@gmail.com>; Dhananjay Chaturvedi <dhananjay....@gmail.com>; Capt. Vikas <captvi...@yahoo.com>; Pawan Chandra <pawanc...@me.com>; SURESH BAKSHI <sureshb...@gmail.com>; anil kapur <mono...@hotmail.com>; nareshkumarias <nareshk...@gmail.com>; Vijay Dalmia <vpda...@gmail.com>; Mahendra Garg <garg_...@yahoo.co.in>; Gulshan Kumar Bhatia <gkb5...@yahoo.com>; Ashish Agrawal <agraw...@gmail.com>; Rishabh Mehrotra <rishabh...@gmail.com>; shyam khosla <sskh...@hotmail.com>; Romi Mathur <romi....@gmail.com>; eldeco-utopia-sector-93a-noida] <eldec <Jswa...@hotmail.com>; Brig Narayan Inder <indern...@hotmail.com>; Anjali Singh <anjali...@gmail.com>; Aman Agarwal (OL-1/2201) <a...@iifbs.in>; Mukesh Aggarwal <mukesh.a...@gmail.com>; Jitendra Nath <nath_j...@yahoo.com>; Chhavi BAJPAI <chhavi...@st.com>; Vishal Arora <vishala...@yahoo.com>; nirmaan bajpai <bajp...@yahoo.com>
Subject: RE: CC95
i had pointed this out in 2008/9 when i was asked to sign the complaint - and at first glance i saw it was so poorly framed.
at that time i had mentioned that with this sort of an amateur show the builder with his experienced legal team can easily "ghumaao" us for decades
however, no one paid any heed to me
From: Praveen Sharma
Sent: 18/07/2016 15:10
To: Minoo (Petrofin)
Cc: eldeco-utopia-s...@yahoogroups.co.in; Urwag; Rajiv Dubey; Dhananjay Chaturvedi; Capt. Vikas; Pawan Chandra; Gautam Gode; SURESH BAKSHI; anil kapur; nareshkumarias; Vijay Dalmia; Mahendra Garg; Gulshan Kumar Bhatia; Ashish Agrawal; Rishabh Mehrotra; shyam khosla; Romi Mathur; eldeco-utopia-sector-93a-noida] <eldec; Brig Narayan Inder; Anjali Singh; Aman Agarwal (OL-1/2201); Mukesh Aggarwal; Jitendra Nath; Chhavi BAJPAI; Vishal Arora; nirmaan bajpai
Subject: Re: CC95
ultimately they have a judgement and we don't. anyway, i got this info and thought of sharing it with the group
On Mon, Jul 18, 2016 at 2:45 PM, Minoo@Petrofin <mi...@petrofin.com> wrote:
Good Question
Refer the next edition of the Pathfinder for the update and chronological history
Scroll down for more.
Any questions? Please feel to ask per return mail.
And I shall be ever willing to oblige.
Minoo
In the meantime, please note that since 3rd March 2016, the Hon’ble Commission has been pleased to expand the benefits and reliefs to include all those other than 37 original complaints, “all those persons who share/have a common interest in the issues raised in the Original/Amended Complaint”.
This is indeed a landmark order especially when EIPL were claiming dismissal of the entire complaint on the grounds that AURA alone have the right to represent the community in respect of their rights over common areas, vide a letter written by Manish Pratik, the then Aura Secretary in November 2015, at the behest of EIPL
2. By way of a teaser, let me update you on the fact that, per Order of 5th April 2016, the original claims of Rs. 30-40 crores (2009 estimates) against the Builder are now anticipated to increase by at least Rs. 85-150 crores, if not more due to the consumer being most grievously “short changed” due to misuse by the OP (Opposite party) of additional FAR without the consent of the allottee for construction of additional flats post the date of 1st sanction.
Incidentally, at the very first pre-admittance hearing in June 2009, the then Presiding Member of the Hon’ble Commission was astute enough to ask us to indicate the deviations if any, from the marketing brochures and/or sanction plans. (And this has come in most useful to us, even though it has taken me 6 years to discover all the deviations!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
And consequent to my stout appeal to seek summary redressal, the Hon’ble Commission has been pleased to admit “additional” documents through an amendment to the original plaint to enlarge the claim from Rs. 30-40 crores by whatever is deemed necessary on the basis of documents that the Builder has till this day, suppressed, and which we have discovered” through the P.N (Public Notice) of 26th August 2015, issued by Noida Authority in respect of the objections to the final completion plans submitted by EIPL.
Need I say more?
Minoo Bhagwagar
18.7.2016
I am sure that you are smart enough to
From: Praveen Sharma [mailto:sharma...@gmail.com]
Sent: Monday, July 18, 2016 1:29 PM
To: Minoo (Petrofin) <mi...@petrofin.com>; eldeco-utopia-s...@yahoogroups.co.in
Subject: CC95
minooji
was with a friend in gurgaon and she told me they had a judgement by ncdrc within 9 months. the case is against unitech for E-space gurgaon. wonder why cc95 is taking so many years.
p