Speaker A: Let’s talk about what happens between now and those elections. You wrote Congress should introduce and aggressively pursue articles of impeachment against Trump. I think, frankly, there are a lot of critics of this war who think that that goes too far and would be very surprised by that recommendation. Can you lay out why you think that Trump’s actions here constitute high crimes and misdemeanors that qualify him for impeachment and removal from office?
Speaker B: Wow. I can’t think of anything aside, perhaps from trying to overturn an election. I can’t think of anything that comes closer to being a high crime and misdemeanor and therefore impeachment bait, than what President Trump has done here, which is pursue a war not authorized in advance by the Congress. It doesn’t get more fundamental than that. So that’s an easy one. Now, let me say this. There are people whose opinions for which I have the greatest respect who believe that. That no political purpose, no wise purpose, is served by what is almost certain to be a failed effort to impeach, much less remove, President Trump from office based on this unconstitutional war. I get that, and I respect deeply people who hold that view. There are people who believe that the main event is the elections and danger lurks there in terms of the potential that this same administration might well interfere with the elections or thwart the desires of the voters. And I deeply respect that. On the other hand, there is something about the performative dimension of constitutional law. Just as President Trump is often said to be doing things for performative reasons, he’s not the only one that gets to do things in American democracy for performative reasons. And I think there is a valid performative reason for people to be furious with him to the point of trying to get him removed from office. Even if it fails, I think it’s important for people to take a stand on this and over history, as the column that you mentioned in the Boston Globe indicated. There have been members of Congress and senators who have taken on popular stance and history has been kind to them. I’m thinking of Representative Lee of California who voted against the aumf. There were two senators who voted against the Tonkin Gulf Resolution. A congressman from Illinois named Lincoln was very hostile to the Polk administration for bringing about what he thought was an unwise and illegal war with Mexico. I think those kinds of events are profiles in courage, and I’d like to see some profiles in courage here. And sometimes you have to show courage, even if you know that at the end of the day you’re not going to get what you think you should get, which is removal of this president. Condemnation and removal.
US troops reportedly told the war in Iran is intended to bring about biblical end times, Armageddon. https://www.aljazeera.com/news/2026/3/4/why-are-the-us-and-israel-framing-the-ongoing-conflict-as-a-religious-war
Noem Flails When Asked if She Had “Sexual Relations” With DHS Adviser Homeland Security Secretary Kristi Noem was asked point-blank about whether she’s sleeping with Corey Lewandowski. https://newrepublic.com/post/207390/noem-questioned-relationship-lewandowski-congress
Time to End the American-Israeli Alliance Alliances are built on shared interests. Those do not exist here. https://prospect.org/2026/03/05/israel-america-alliance-iran-war-trump-rubio-netanyahu/
Gavin Newsom—GAVIN NEWSOM!—Calls Israel ‘Sort of an Apartheid State’ Today on TAP: And calls for stopping U.S. military aid to the nation. https://prospect.org/2026/03/04/gavin-newsom-calls-israel-apartheid-state-democrats-primaries/
Kristi Noem Misled Congress About Top Aide’s Role in DHS Contracts ProPublica
Trump’s tariff hike to 15% likely this week, Bessent says Business Times