How refreshing to wake up the morning after an election feeling better, not worse. A five to ten point shift to Democrats occurred in every state, city and town, and in every kind of race: governor, legislator, mayor, judge, utility regulator, county commissioner and, where elected, dog catcher.
Normally I'd worry about complacency, but we're past that. The sheer size of the win gives millions of people hope to get up off the mat and back in a game they once again believe we can win.
Media coverage will slightly improve, even in places lately absorbed by the emerging right wing media monopoly, though differences there will be even slighter. Stories about feckless Democrats in hopeless disarray will subside a bit. A pundit or two may even ask what's wrong with the Republican message, or start to notice Trump's fierce psychological and cognitive decline. The next No King's rally may get something more like the coverage due the biggest political rally in American history.
The reason is simple. All American political reporting is about the gain or loss of personal political power. No scandal gets attention until it threatens someone's hold on power. No challenger gets attention until the horse race is already neck and neck. Last night, the sharks got their first, faint whiff of Republican blood in the water. For now at least, they'll write differently on account of it.
Democrats must still engage in public soul searching of the kind they've studiously avoided for a solid year now. The entire debate over the party's identity and direction has been whether to go with Zohran Mamdani's fiery populism or Mikie Sherrill's and Abigail Spanberger bland centrism. Do we energize the base or try to persuade the undecideds?
Someone should tell them no one ever won a competitive election without doing both. Mamdani, Sherrill and Spanberger all spent the general election borrowing liberally from one another's playbooks. All three talked about keeping down costs for middle class families, though Mamdani was the only one to propose anything concrete or specific. All three hammered Trump mercilessly. All three were aided in their effort by a Democratic wave of floodtide proportion.
The usual suspects spout that only bland centrists win purple House seats. I don't doubt Sherril's and Spanberger's caution helped them, but I sincerely doubt the corporate centrism to which they're so doggedly devoted helped at all.
Being so close to corporate donors makes it less likely you'll have anything useful to say about raising wages, fighting corruption or lowering costs of energy, health care, or homes. All of those require some level of systemic change, which is of course the thing people who profit the most from the system hate the most.
You know economic populism works if only because Trump and the Democratic centrists try so hard to impersonate it. But as Mamdani is already learning, it must come with an assurance the leader will keep an eye on the public purse and not rush into things without really knowing how they work.
For too long, Democrats chased after Washington's illusory, lobbyist crafted center. They must now search for America's center. You know it when you see it. It prizes fiscal responsibility and honest, competent governance. It responds to cultural leadership that is bold, but also humble and respectful. It absolutely includes fighting climate change and opposing reckless militarism, though you wouldn't know it to listen to current top Democrats.
If we're to defeat fascism, we must have this conversation now; not about who we're for but what we're for. I expect Trump to continue on a path of self harm but we'd be fools to rely too much on it. If, for a brief while, we can dispense with mere tactics, if we can focus on policy rather than mere message, we can meld the best of these campaigns into a platform and strategy on which we can win in 2026 and 2028 and govern, for a long time, free of the fear of tyrants.