Gun owners... look what's on the 2010 tax return :: Gun Registration by tax return done by regulation! And that is not all! WE TOLD YOU, OBAMA IS GOING AFTER YOUR GUNS!!!!!
US Army Veteran
VERIFIED - TRUE by snopes.com
http://www.snopes.com/politics/guns/blairholt.asp
As if we didn't have enough to get upset about! If you have a gun, I hope
it isn't registered!
It begins ... more Freedom go! ne ... t he right to protect yourself and
your
family gone! Now ALL GUNS must be listed on your next (2010) tax return!
Senate Bill SB-2099 will require us to put on our 2009 1040 federal tax
form all guns that you have or own. It will require fingerprints and a tax
of $50 per gun. This bill was introduced on February 24, 2009, by the Obama
staff. BUT, this bill will only become public knowledge 30 days after the
new law becomes effective! This is an amendment to the Internal Revenue Act
of 1986. This means that the Finance Committee has passed this without the
Senate voting on it at all. Trust Obama? You must be kidding!
The full text of the IRS amendment is on the U.S. Senate homepage:
www.senate.gov.
You can find the bill by doing a search by the bill number, SB-2099. You
know who to call; I strongly suggest you do. Please send a copy of this
e-mail to every gun owner you know.
Text of H.R.45 as Introduced in House: Blair Holt's Firearm Licensing and
Record of Sale Act of 2009:
www.opencongress.org/bill/111-h45/text
Obama's Congress is now starting on the firearms confiscation bill. If it
passes, gun owners will become criminals if you don't fully comply.
It has begun ... Whatever Obama's "Secret Master Plan" is ... this is just
the 'tip of the iceberg!'
Very Important for you to be aware of a new bill HR 45 introduced into the
House. This is the Blair Holt Firearm Licensing & Record of Sale Act of
2009.
Even gun shop owners didn't know about this because the government is
trying to fly it under the radar as a 'minor' IRS revision, and, as usual,
the 'political' lawmakers did not read this bill before! signing and
approving it!
To find out about this - go to any government website and type in HR 45 or
Goggle HR 45 Blair Holt Firearm Licensing & Record of Sales Act of 2009.
You will get all the information.
Basically this would make it illegal to own a firearm - any rifle with a
clip or ANY pistol unless:
1) It is registered
2) You are fingerprinted
3) You supply a current Driver's License
4) You supply your Social Security number
5) You will submit to a physical & mental evaluation at any time of their
choosing
Each update change or ownership through private or public sale must be
reported and costs $25. Failure to do so you automatically lose the right
to own a firearm and are subject up to a year in jail.
There is a child provision clause on page 16 section 305 stating a
child-access provision. Gun must be locked and inaccessible to any child
under 18. They would have the right to come and inspect that you are
storing your gun safely away from accessibility to children and fine is
punishable for up to 5 years in prison.
If you think this is a joke - go to the website and take your pick of many
options to read this. It is long and lengthy. But, more and more people are
becoming aware of this. Pass the word along. Any hunters in your family
pass this along.
This is just a "termite" approach to complete confiscation of guns and
disarming of our society to the point we have no defense - chip away a
little here and there until the goal is accomplished before anyone realizes
it.
This is one to act on whether you own a gun or not.
Search Results - THOMAS (Library of Congress)
H.R.45: Blair Holt's Firearm Licensing and Record of Sale Act o! f 2009 -
U.S. Congress - OpenCongress
H.R.45: Blair Holt's Firearm Licensing and Record of Sale Act of 2009
(GovTrack.us)
Please copy and send this out to EVERYONE in the USA, whether you support
the Right to Bear Arms or are for gun control. We all should have the right
to choose.
Gerbil Ass Limpballs
"US Army Veteran" <usar...@yahoo.com> wrote in message
news:J62dnQ_a-77_aaLW...@giganews.com...
> Gun owners... look what's on the 2010 tax return
>
> VERIFIED - TRUE by snopes.com
>
> http://www.snopes.com/politics/guns/blairholt.asp
You can go shoot some dogs for dinner.
Lookout
<usar...@yahoo.com> wrote:
>Gun owners... look what's on the 2010 tax return
>
>VERIFIED - TRUE by snopes.com
>
>http://www.snopes.com/politics/guns/blairholt.asp
You're a lying little prick
invalid
<usar...@yahoo.com> wrote:
>Gun owners... look what's on the 2010 tax return
>
>VERIFIED - TRUE by snopes.com
>
>http://www.snopes.com/politics/guns/blairholt.asp
>
>
>As if we didn't have enough to get upset about! If you have a gun, I hope
>it isn't registered!
While serial wife beating criminals with a history of violent attacks
on multiple women, such as yourself Gerald, have cause for concern,
decent folk do not.
(c) Purposes- The purposes of this Act and the amendments made by this
Act are--
(1) to protect the public against the unreasonable risk of injury and
death associated with the unrecorded sale or transfer of qualifying
firearms to criminals and youth;
(2) to ensure that owners of qualifying firearms are knowledgeable in
the safe use, handling, and storage of those firearms;
(3) to restrict the availability of qualifying firearms to criminals,
youth, and other persons prohibited by Federal law from receiving
firearms; and
(4) to facilitate the tracing of qualifying firearms used in crime by
Federal and State law enforcement agencies.
None4U
"invalid" <invalid.invalid@invalid> wrote in message
news:04e0k5tq6egni3shl...@4ax.com...
> On Sat, 2 Jan 2010 16:35:27 -0900, "US Army Veteran"
> <usar...@yahoo.com> wrote:
>
>>Gun owners... look what's on the 2010 tax return
>>
>>VERIFIED - TRUE by snopes.com
>>
>>http://www.snopes.com/politics/guns/blairholt.asp
>>
>>
>>As if we didn't have enough to get upset about! If you have a gun, I hope
>>it isn't registered!
>
> While serial wife beating criminals with a history of violent attacks
> on multiple women, such as yourself Gerald, have cause for concern,
> decent folk do not.
>
>
>
> (c) Purposes- The purposes of this Act and the amendments made by this
> Act are--
>
> life scumbags the government is trying to turn the country over too.
>
To get a list of guns that can be confiscated later by the now enpowered
foreign criminal police force empowered by Obama the traitor.
>
> (3) to restrict the availability of all firearms to all law abiding
> American citizens.
>
> (4) to facilitate the tracing of qualifying firearms owned by Americans
> for
> Federal and State law enforcement agencies.to confiscate.
Youre a fucking liar.
The purpose of the act is to register all firearms for confiscation later.
Unfortunately nobody will register them and private owner gun sales will
skyrocket .
invalid
wrote:
>
>"invalid" <invalid.invalid@invalid> wrote in message
>news:04e0k5tq6egni3shl...@4ax.com...
>> On Sat, 2 Jan 2010 16:35:27 -0900, "US Army Veteran"
>> <usar...@yahoo.com> wrote:
>>
>>>Gun owners... look what's on the 2010 tax return
>>>
>>>VERIFIED - TRUE by snopes.com
>>>
>>>http://www.snopes.com/politics/guns/blairholt.asp
>>>
>>>
>>>As if we didn't have enough to get upset about! If you have a gun, I hope
>>>it isn't registered!
>>
>> While serial wife beating criminals with a history of violent attacks
>> on multiple women, such as yourself Gerald, have cause for concern,
>> decent folk do not.
>>
>>
>>
>> (c) Purposes- The purposes of this Act and the amendments made by this
>> Act are--
>>
>> (1) To prevent the puiblic from protecting themselves against the low
>> life scumbags the government is trying to turn the country over too.
>>
>
> To get a list of guns that can be confiscated later by the now enpowered
>foreign criminal police force empowered by Obama the traitor.
A try at a scare mongering by falsely alleging that " foreign cops"
were getting "police powers" in the US
No "foreign cops" exist to be empowered, only American ones in the
justice department.
Fact -INTERPOL isn't a law enforcement agency.
Interpol Under Siege by Uninformed Bloggers
http://www.undispatch.com/interpol-under-siege-uninformed-bloggers
Last week, the Obama Administration issued an executive order that
extended certain diplomatic privileges to Interpol--the International
Criminal Police Organization. This was a pretty innocuous
bureaucratic move, but it has apparently sparked some serious concerns
among a certain cadre of blogger. For example, you have Steve
Shippert and Clyde Middleton of ThreatsWatch worrying that this "could
conceivably include...Americans arrested on our soil by INTERPOL
officers." And Andy McCarthy of National Review writes,
"This international police force...will be unrestrained by the U.S.
Constitution and American law while it operates in the United States
and affects both Americans and American interests outside the United
States...Why would we elevate an international police force above
American law? Why would we immunize an international police force from
the limitations that constrain the FBI and other American
law-enforcement agencies?"
Both McCarthy and the ThreatsWatch duo's understanding of how Interpol
works seems to be heavily shaped by fiction and film. In real life,
Interpol is also not an "international police force." This would
imply that Interpol is composed of units of officers that can chase
criminals across the world, Jason Bourne style. In fact, there is no
such thing as an "Interpol officer," as such. Rather, law enforcement
officers from Interpol's member states are seconded to the
organization from national law enforcement agencies, like the FBI,
U.S. Marshals, Royal Canadian Mounted Police, ect.
This is not just a semantic distinction. Officers seconded to Interpol
do not have any sort of transnational executive arrest power. Rather,
officers seconded to Interpol do things like coordinate busts of
international child pornography rings. The people actually making the
arrests, though, are members of the national law enforcement of the
country where the crimes are committed. They are not "Interpol
Officers" -- because there is no such thing as an "Interpol Officer."
Further, "Interpol" can't arrest an American on American soil, a
Canadian on Canadian soil or a Rwandan on a Rwandan soil. Only
national law enforcement can do that.
As to the specific reaon why the Obama administration would decide,
last week, to extend to Interpol the same suite of diplomatic
privileges that are typically accorded to international organizations?
I don't have a good answer for that. My sense is that it probably has
something to with the accessibility of Interpol's secure criminal
databases (on things like stolen passports and the like). But that is
a question that could pretty easily be answered by a phone call to the
Justice Department.
I can say with authority that stoking concerns about Interpol whisking
Americans away is un-informed fear mongering.
*For the record, I worked at Interpol's Headquarters in Lyon France in
2002.
>>
>> (3) to restrict the availability of all firearms to all law abiding
>> American citizens.
>
>>
>> (4) to facilitate the tracing of qualifying firearms owned by Americans
>> for
>> Federal and State law enforcement agencies.to confiscate.
editing the bill on Usenet to make it say what you'd like it to say is
a bit kooky don't you think?
>
>Youre a fucking liar.
It's no good foaming at the messenger kook.
That is the actual language of the bill that you are making up these
crazy stories about for your own purposes.
>The purpose of the act is to register all firearms for confiscation later.
>Unfortunately nobody will register them and private owner gun sales will
>skyrocket .
You mean you imagine illegal gun sales will rocket?
I guess if you choose to go to prison for two years that's up to you.
Go for it!
Be the end of you being able to vote for Palin won't it?
Only criminals and lunatics have anything to fear .
If you are so upset I guess you must be one of them.
Lookout
wrote:
>
>"invalid" <invalid.invalid@invalid> wrote in message
>news:04e0k5tq6egni3shl...@4ax.com...
>> On Sat, 2 Jan 2010 16:35:27 -0900, "US Army Veteran"
>> <usar...@yahoo.com> wrote:
>>
>>>Gun owners... look what's on the 2010 tax return
>>>
>>>VERIFIED - TRUE by snopes.com
>>>
>>>http://www.snopes.com/politics/guns/blairholt.asp
>>>
>>>
>>>As if we didn't have enough to get upset about! If you have a gun, I hope
>>>it isn't registered!
>>
>> While serial wife beating criminals with a history of violent attacks
>> on multiple women, such as yourself Gerald, have cause for concern,
>> decent folk do not.
>>
>>
>>
>> (c) Purposes- The purposes of this Act and the amendments made by this
>> Act are--
>>
>> (1) To prevent the puiblic from protecting themselves against the low
>> life scumbags the government is trying to turn the country over too.
>>
>
> To get a list of guns that can be confiscated later by the now enpowered
>foreign criminal police force empowered by Obama the traitor.
You're lying.
>> (3) to restrict the availability of all firearms to all law abiding
>> American citizens.
>
>>
>> (4) to facilitate the tracing of qualifying firearms owned by Americans
>> for
>> Federal and State law enforcement agencies.to confiscate.
>
>Youre a fucking liar.
You can't call someone a liar who is quoting something you idiot.
>
>
>The purpose of the act is to register all firearms for confiscation later.
You're lying again.
Bert Hyman
<usar...@yahoo.com> wrote:
> Senate Bill SB-2099
S.2099
Title: A bill to suspend temporarily the duty on certain heaters.
> Text of H.R.45 as Introduced in House: Blair Holt's Firearm Licensing
> and Record of Sale Act of 2009:
No co-sponsors, no corresponding Senate bill.
Referred to committee last February and never heard of again.
Just FYI.
--
Bert Hyman St. Paul, MN be...@iphouse.com
No-bammer
> Gun owners... look what's on the 2010 tax return
>
> VERIFIED - TRUE by snopes.com
>
> http://www.snopes.com/politics/guns/blairholt.asp
If you believe the snopes dopes, you might as well believe moveon.org or
the nbc commies.
Demon Buddha
> Gun owners... look what's on the 2010 tax return
Jesus christ... you people need to learn how to write. Honestly, that
post was so convoluted I could barely make heads or tails of it.
Blair Holt was introduced Jan. 6 2009. To see its current status, see:
http://www.govtrack.us/congress/bill.xpd?bill=h111-45
If there is something else going on, your post wholly failed to make it
clear. Would you mind rewriting it so people can actually understand
what you have written? Clearly the tone suggests you were a bit
emotionally wound up when you wrote it. I understand that bit, but it
helps nobody if you write in that state of mind such that what you post
is largely unintelligible. No offense intended, mind you - just letting
you know that you need to be more clear in your messaging.
RD (The Sandman)
news:J62dnQ_a-77_aaLW...@giganews.com:
> Gun owners... look what's on the 2010 tax return
>
> VERIFIED - TRUE by snopes.com
No, it isn't. You didn't read your own cite, dipstick. That is HR45
which has been around for quite awhile. It was referred to the House
subcommittee in Feb of last year where it has quietly died.
> http://www.snopes.com/politics/guns/blairholt.asp
--
Sleep well tonight,
RD (The Sandman)
Let's see if I have this healthcare thingy right. Congress is to pass
a plan written by a committee whose head has said he doesn't understand
it, passed by a Congress that hasn't read it, signed by a president who
hasn't read it, with funding administered by a Treasury chief who didn't
pay his taxes because he didn't understand TurboTax, overseen by an obese
Surgeon General and financed by a country that's nearly broke.
What could possibly go wrong?
DamOTclese
>Senate Bill SB-2099 will require us to put on our 2009 1040 federal tax
>form all guns that you have or own. It will require fingerprints and a tax
>of $50 per gun.
I bet you that a bunch of you insane racist piles of Republican Christian
shits actually believe this, too.
---
Does belief in astrology cause insanity? http://www.skeptictank.org/edm.htm
Anonymouse
actually only partially true.
the proposed bill exists.
it has not been voted on, probably never will, and is NOT law.
--
Hackamore
http://www.hackamoretravel.com