— KEEP OUT OF AUSTRALIAN AND RELIGIOUS GROUPS YOU NEO-NAZI SCUM AND AMERICAN WAR VETERAN JACKASS

[dolf]

KEEP OUT OF AUSTRALIAN AND RELIGIOUS GROUPS YOU NEO-NAZI SCUM AND AMERICAN
WAR VETERAN JACKASS

Colonel Edmund J. Burke <burke...@bigass-babes.com> wrote:
>>>>> Do you want me to come up there and punch your lights out?
>>>>
>>>> yea , you sure owe it to me ,
>>>> after all i've been kicking yours ,
>>>> for over 20 years
>>>
>>> In your wet dreams, phony assworm.
>>
>> well way to get after coming up here
>
> Idiot!
>

-- YOUR ARMY NEEDS YOU AND YOUR RESILIENCE (DON’T F@CK YOUR COUNTY WITH
#325 {5x5 = #65 - *SOLDIER*} - DETRUDE)

(c) 2019 Dolf Leendert Boek, Revision: 6 January, 2019

For our next update to the GRAPPLE prototype we have to give some
consideration on how to resolve the perennial problem of SOCIAL MEDIA
conquest defined as the:

PRO DOMO {ie. FOR THEIR OWN CAUSE OF IDENTITY}
SUI JURIS AS #231 - JUXTAPOSITION CONTROL {eg: IGNORANCE}
MEMBRUM VIRILE AS #120 / #360 - TRANSFORMATIVE PROTOTYPE

YOUTUBE: "Your Army Needs You, and Your Resilience"

<https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=YFGHEZMSek4>

Dynamic within the context of the #72 - ANTHROPIC PROTOTYPE quest {#312 -
ATTRIBUTE DIFFERENTIALS / #288 - IDEALISATIONS} for sexual opportunism:

#231 - JUXTAPOSITION CONTROL (ANKH BINOMIAL HETEROS / TORAH PROTOTYPES OF
THE PERENNIALIST ECONOMY)@{
@1: Sup: 81 (#81); Ego: 81 (#81),
@2: Sup: 78 (#159); Ego: 78 (#159 - SEE KANT'S IDEA B159),
@3: Sup: 72 (#231 - *AT* *THE* *GOING* *DOWN* *OF* *THE* *SUN* *AND*
*IN* *THE* *MORNING*); Ego: 75 (#234 - SEE KANT'S IDEA B234),
@4: Sup: 71 (#302); Ego: 80 (#314),
@5: Sup: 67 (#369 - #9 X #41); Ego: 77 (#391 - *ANTAGONISM* *WITH* #902
- RULE OF LAW (EGALITÉ {9 JULY 1900}: #22 x #41 AS *ONTIC* NECESSITY
COMPRISING A SUBSET OF 21 CONSONANTS WITH #VOWELS OF SEMITIC ORIGINS), #492
- VOLUNTARY FREE WILL (LIBERTÉ {17 SEPTEMBER 1900}: #12 X #41), and #391 -
HOMOGENEOUS PRINCIPLES (FRATERNITÉ {29 OCTOBER 1900}) OF QUEEN VICTORIA'S
LETTERS PATENT TO THE FEDERATION OF THE AUSTRALIAN COMMONWEALTH 1901),
@6: Sup: 60 (#429); Ego: 74 (#465),
@7: Sup: 58 (#487); Ego: 79 (#544),
@8: Sup: 53 (#540); Ego: 76 (#620),
@9: Sup: 45 (#585); Ego: 73 (#693),
Male: #585; Feme: #693
}

#360 - TRANSFORMATIVE PROTOTYPE (ANKH BINOMIAL HETEROS PROTOTYPES OF THE
PERENNIALIST ECONOMY)@{
@1: Sup: 8 (#8); Ego: 8 (#8),
@2: Sup: 24 (#32); Ego: 16 (#24),
@3: Sup: 48 (#80); Ego: 24 (#48),
@4: Sup: 80 (#160); Ego: 32 (#80),
@5: Sup: 39 (#199); Ego: 40 (#120),
@6: Sup: 6 (#205); Ego: 48 (#168 - I AM NOT THE CAUSE OF WEEPING TO ANY
{%26}),
@7: Sup: 62 (#267); Ego: 56 (#224),
@8: Sup: 45 (#312 - CONTRADICTION BY *WITHERED* *STATE* *WREATHS*);
Ego: 64 (#288 - *MEMORIAL*, *REMINDER*, *REMEMBRANCE* COMMON WITH ADOLF
HITLER'S USAGE),
@9: Sup: 36 (#348); Ego: 72 (#360),
Male: #348; Feme: #360
}

I've just watched the latest SBS TV episode of "Pope: The Most Powerful Man
In History" and I have to say with respects to COMMUNISM as being entirely
a semantical political construct by dialectics of #312 - CONTRADICTION that
is distinct from the repulsive machinations of FASCISM / CATHOLICISM {ie.
as competatively #231 - JUXTAPOSITION CONTROL / #360 - TRANSFORMATIVE
PROTOTYPE AGAINST THE BIOLOGICAL ORDER} whereby they are facilitators
within the process of REASON:

#364
#312
#273

As no less than the FRENCH by their societal revolution of 1789.

So how are we going to achieve this?

That the PRO DOMO, SUI JURIS, MEMBRUM VIRILE might be considered in terms
of a LEGAL LOGICAL SYLLOGISM:

THE MAJOR PREMISE {YANG/FATHER/HEAVEN/MALE/FORM - Formula of Universal
Law}, which contains the law of that will:

In the consideration of a #72 - ANTHROPOLOGICAL PROTOTYPE this might be
thought of as the default birth DAEMON or any IMPETUS as CATEGORY OF
UNDERSTANDING (ie. #205 - *PRINCIPLE* *OF* *THE* *PERSISTENCE* *OF*
*SUBSTANCE*):

The #1 - seraphim, #2 - cherubim, #3 - thrones, #4 - dominions, #5 -
virtues, #6 - powers,#7 - principalities, #8 - arch-angel, #9 - angel prime
directive which is the default disposition

THE MINOR PREMISE {YIN/MOTHER/EARTH/FEMALE/MATTER - Formula of Humanity},
which contains the command to behave in accordance with the law, that is,
the principle of subsumption under the law:

This might be a consideration of the #231 - JUXTAPOSITION prototype
directive from #73 to #81 as CONTROL (ie. #164 - *PRINCIPLE* *OF*
*MATERIALITY*)

THE CONCLUSION {ZHUN/SON/SEA/ENUMERATE/OFFSPRING - Formula of Autonomy},
which contains the verdict (sentence), what is laid down as right in the
case at hand:

This might be a consideration of the ONTIC syncretism {ie. #205 / #164:
#364 ... #312 ... #273 dialectics} process which in metaphysical terms is
the cohesion that occurs before there is a streaming of consciousness
within the instantiation of temporality.

So we may need to define a totally new grappleIDEA which is capable as
perhaps a composite of the GIZMO array populated with relevant ONTIC and
TEMPORAL DIALECTIC CATEGORIES OF UNDERSTANDING:

{nous: #nn, z: n, x: n, y: n, directive: #nnn, category: #nnn, type: (m |
f)}

which will then act as WATCHERS / RECEIVERS in conveying such a composite
notion so that we can explore by analytic judgements such a notion as
GNOSIS EX MACHINA.

We shall not be able to address this issue in any material manner of
javascript prototyping until we have *COMPLETED* our court submission by 26
JANUARY 2019 that is titled:

"SPECIFICITIES OF NON-FACTUALITY BEING THEN GROUNDS FOR COUNTY COURT APPEAL
AS CASE NUMBER: AP-18-0609 AGAINST A PUBLIC AUTHORITY'S INFIDELITY TO WAR
#288 - MEMORIAL COMMEMORATIONS DUE TO ALIGNMENT WITH A FOREIGN POWER"

<http://www.grapple369.com/Groundwork/SPECIFICITIES%20OF%20NON-FACTUALITY%20AP-18-0609%20%28Censored%29.pdf>

Yet egotistically, SOCIAL MEDIA often ALSO claims as its integral view, the
resorting to a process as disenfranchising of the essence and soul of the
human dignity itself as the value of the person being the other by its
habituated pervasive carelessness as a culture of disrespect which is
always a quantification as:

#1 - A DEGREE OF AVARICIOUS WANT;
#2 - THE POTENTIAL OF LIMITATIONS UPON REALITY;
#3 - A CAPABILITY TO BEGUILE AND STUPEFY WITH WORDS, THE QUARRY SOUGHT AS
THE OBJECT OF VIRILE NECESSITY;
#4 - VARIANCE OF ACCEPTABILITY AS THE CAUSE FOR IMPROBABILITY;
#5 - THE PERMISSIBILITY OF IDEALISATIONS;
#6 - THE ORGANISATIONAL READINESS TO ELIMINATE ANY INHIBITORS TO THE
PHYSICAL DYNAMICS OF OPPORTUNITY;
#7 - TO FACILITATE A SPORTING PROWESS OF A PROUD ACCOMPLISHMENT IN A
MUTUALLY SATISFYING PURPOSED DELIVERY; AND
#8 - A JOB WELL DONE, ALWAYS WANTS MORE.

I have in the past, even given such cursory universal observations which
are independent of gender and sexual identity as summarily proclaimed as
long ago as 12 FEBRUARY 2017 but not exhaustively made of the sexual act.
Been accused of over intellectualising how people engage their wants within
this physical act.

Although some have more succinctly surmised as nothing more than a f@ck you
and then onto the next, until you run out of opportunities.

Now that SAME SEX MARRIAGE has been adopted within LEGISLATION, how
effectively and strategically the GLBTQI COMMUNITY engages within this
process can do more to effectively control and eliminate neo-nazism and
religious extremism than 17 years of the Afghanistan or Iraqi Wars could
ever do.

With the continuing rise of neo-nazism, terrorism and religious bigotry
this nation especially needs you to be mindful of the effect that the
sexual opportunities you make can win that war.

In chaos theory, the butterfly effect is the sensitive dependence on
initial conditions in which a small change in one state of a deterministic
nonlinear system can result in large differences in a later state.

YOUTUBE: "The Butterfly Effect | This Video Will Change Your Life |
Documentary"

<https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=G2xFJUSLEv8>

Sadly such ignorance of individual #391 - HOMOGENEOUS accountability in
safe guarding any PRO DOMO entitlement without diminishing another party's
SUI JURIS / MEMBRUM VIRILE human rights / constitutional protections within
sexual opportunism amongst GRINDR users is especially deprecated to the
extent that its culpability and deprivation within the community is worse
than any socially communicable disease of living memory.

So within the coming weeks we're going to give some consideration to
expanding the GRAPPLE prototype with PRO DOMO / SUI JURIS / MEMBRUM VIRILE
notions as methodology functions.

Thus in terms of any cognitive processes (ie. as then the foundational
basis for probability theory as determinism of occurrence} what I desire to
observe is the process of intuition as the osmosis intersections which
occur within the neurological predisposition as nuanced syllogism (ie. we
need to still develop adequate semantics of nomenclature which agreeably
convey this).

So for example if I wanted to determine the reality of the notion: “this is
a test” as a criteria of existentiality, this would then require a
resolution of the criteria of enquiry being the hierarchy pairing as: #61 /
#122 against the default neurological and personalistic disposition:

[this, {@1: Sup: 49 (#49); Ego: 74 (#74)},
is, {@2: Sup: 5 (#54); Ego: 28 (#102 - I AM NOT RAPACIOUS {%4})},
a, {@3: Sup: 6 (#60); Ego: 1 (#103)},
test] {@4: Sup: 1 (#61); Ego: 19 (#122)}

#49 + #54 + #60 + #61 = #224 - *TO* *BRING* *FORTH* *TO* *VIEW*, *TO*
*SHOW*
#74 + #102 + #103 + #122 = #401 - *RESTRAINT* *OR* *CONTROL*;

G1925@{
@1: Sup: 5 (#5); Ego: 5 (#5),
@2: Sup: 4 (#9); Ego: 80 (#85),
@3: Sup: 9 (#18); Ego: 5 (#90),
@4: Sup: 13 (#31); Ego: 4 (#94),
@5: Sup: 18 (#49); Ego: 5 (#99),
@6: Sup: 28 (#77); Ego: 10 (#109),
@7: Sup: 7 (#84 - I AM NOT A MAN OF VIOLENCE {%2}); Ego: 60 (#169 - I
TROUBLE MYSELF ONLY WITH MY OWN AFFAIRS {%18}),
@8: Sup: 12 (#96); Ego: 5 (#174),
@9: Sup: 62 (#158 - I AM NOT HOT OF SPEECH {%23}); Ego: 50 (#224),
Male: #158; Feme: #224
} // #224

T'AI HSÜAN CHING {POLAR OPPOSITIONS / INTERPLAY OF OPPOSITES} [4 BCE]:

UMBRA: #224 % #41 = #19 - Argument for Ethical Anarchism, Returning to
Simplicity; I-Ching: H57 - Compliance, Gentle Penetration/Wind, Ground,
Calculations; Tetra: 58 - Gathering In;

THOTH MEASURE: #19 - Oh Uammetu, who makest thine appearance at the Block;
I commit not adultery with another's wife.

#VIRTUE: Following (no. #19) means dispersing, but
#TOOLS: Massing (no. #59) means assembling.
#POSITION: With Ease (no. #23), the level and smooth, but
#TIME: With Difficulties (no. #79), the going up and down.
#CANON: #180

ONTIC_OBLIGANS_180@{
@1: Sup: 19 (#19); Ego: 19 (#19),
@2: Sup: 78 (#97); Ego: 59 (#78),
@3: Sup: 20 (#117); Ego: 23 (#101),
@4: Sup: 18 (#135); Ego: 79 (#180 - I COMMIT NOT ADULTERY WITH ANOTHER'S
WIFE {%19}),
Male: #135; Feme: #180
} // #180

#224 as [#5, #80, #5, #4, #5, #10, #60, #5, #50] = epideiknumi (G1925):
{UMBRA: #57 as #224 % #41 = #19} 1) to exhibit, show; 1a) *TO* *BRING*
*FORTH* *TO* *VIEW*, *TO* *SHOW*; 1a1) furnish to be looked at, produce
what may looked at; 1a2) to display something belonging to one's self; 1b)
to prove, demonstrate, set forth to be known and acknowledged;

#401 as #1, #400 = Self; #1, #400 = At; by; with; toward; the particle of
directed emphasis: THIS! (first and last Hebrew letters, like Alpha and
Omega); #40, #70, #90, #200 = *RESTRAINT* *OR* *CONTROL*;

So in order to do so we might need an interim pulse() function by which we
can then approximate thinking as the actuation of any dialectic set {eg:
#364, #312, #273, #237 - STUBBORN WILL} process and its enquiry before
arriving at any final disposition of intersections being then the
composition of knowing and its presentation.

G991@{
@1: Sup: 2 (#2); Ego: 2 (#2),
@2: Sup: 32 (#34); Ego: 30 (#32),
@3: Sup: 37 (#71); Ego: 5 (#37),
@4: Sup: 36 (#107); Ego: 80 (#117),
@5: Sup: 41 (#148 - I AM NOT A TRANSGRESSOR {%12}); Ego: 5 (#122),
Male: #148; Feme: #122
} // #122

T'AI HSÜAN CHING {POLAR OPPOSITIONS / INTERPLAY OF OPPOSITES} [4 BCE]:

UMBRA: #122 % #41 = #40 - Reversal, Avoiding Activity; I-Ching: H36 -
Suppression of the Light, Sinking/Darkening Light, Brilliance injured,
Intelligence hidden; Tetra: 68 - Dimming;

THOTH MEASURE: #40 - Oh Neheb-kau, who makest thy appearance at thy cavern;
I have no unjust preferences.

#VIRTUE: Law (no. #40) means to facilitate union with All-under-Heaven.
#TOOLS: Labouring (no. #80) means to lack achievement despite strenuous
efforts.
#POSITION: With Duties (no. #27), to exhaust oneself.
#TIME: With Fostering (no. #81), to increase oneself.
#CANON: #228

ONTIC_OBLIGANS_228@{
@1: Sup: 40 (#40); Ego: 40 (#40),
@2: Sup: 39 (#79); Ego: 80 (#120),
@3: Sup: 66 (#145); Ego: 27 (#147),
@4: Sup: 66 (#211); Ego: 81 (#228 - I HAVE NO UNJUST PREFERENCES {%40}),
Male: #211; Feme: #228
} // #228

@memeBrain SYNCRETISM:

test] {@4: Sup: 1 (#61); Ego: 19 (#122)},

Thus within this instance of “this is a test” the condition of criteria:
#40, #80, #27, #81 is met within the #205 - *PRINCIPLE* *OF* *THE*
*PERSISTENCE* *OF* *SUBSTANCE*

#122 as [#2, #30, #5, #80, #5] = blepo (G991): {UMBRA: #93 as #122 % #41 =
#40} 1) to see, discern, of the bodily eye; 2) metaphor: to see with the
mind's eye; 3) in a geographical sense of places, mountains, buildings,
etc. turning towards any quarter, as it were, facing it; 1a) with the
bodily eye: to be possessed of sight, have the power of seeing; 1b)
perceive by the use of the eyes: to see, look descry; 1c) to turn the eyes
to anything: to look at, look upon, gaze at; 1d) to perceive by the senses,
to feel; 1e) to discover by use, to know by experience; 2a) to have (the
power of) understanding; 2b) to discern mentally, observe, perceive,
discover, understand; 2c) to turn the thoughts or direct the mind to a
thing, to consider, contemplate, to look at, to weigh carefully, examine;

THIS COGNITIVE FUNCTION HAS NEVER BEFORE BEEN CONCEIVED IN TERMS OF AN
INTUITIVE COMPUTING FUNCTION() but we want to explore it none the less so
as to determine whether it is a viable means in describing the human
sapient paradigm of existence and reality—we may be wrong but it is not
improper to advance a proposition as then an avenue of self discovery.

IMMANUEL KANT'S PROLEGOMENA (1783 AS APRIORITY TO FRENCH REVOLUTION) IDEA:
@B159 THIRD SECTION: OF THE SYSTEM OF PRINCIPLES OF THE PURE UNDERSTANDING

SYSTEMATIC PRESENTATION OF ALL SYNTHETIC PRINCIPLES OF THE PURE
UNDERSTANDING
That principles occur anywhere at all is due solely to the pure
understanding, which is not only the faculty of rules with respect to that
which [IDEA: @B198] happens, but is itself the source of the principles in
accordance with which [IDEA: @A159] everything (that can come forward to
us only as object) necessarily falls under rules, since without such rules
the appearances could never amount to cognition of an object corresponding
to them. Even the #2184 - *LAWS* *OF* *NATURE*:

SECTION VIII: "REQUIRE AND COMMAND ALL OUR OFFICERS AND MINISTERS, CIVIL
AND MILITARY, AND ALL OTHER THE INHABITANTS OF OUR SAID COMMONWEALTH TO BE
#364 - OBEDIENT {#273 - REMEMBRANCE}, #312 - AIDING {#273 - SEPULCHRE}, AND
#273 - ASSISTING {#273 - WEAK} UNTO OUR SAID GOVERNOR GENERAL {

#2184 - *LAWS* *OF* *NATURE* AS ANTHROPOLOGICAL COSMOLOGICAL PRINCIPLE / 12
= #182 AS DATE(1996,3,20) + 5 x #364 + #182 = SUNSET OF 11 SEPTEMBER 2001

}, OR, IN THE EVENT OF HIS DEATH, #273 - INCAPACITY, OR ABSENCE, TO SUCH
PERSON OR PERSONS AS MAY, FROM TIME TO TIME, UNDER THE PROVISIONS OF THESE
OUR LETTERS PATENT, ADMINISTER {#2184 - LAWS OF NATURE AS ANTHROPOLOGICAL
COSMOLOGICAL PRINCIPLE / 13 = #168 - I AM NOT THE CAUSE OF WEEPING TO ANY
{%26 - *YHWH*}} THE GOVERNMENT OF OUR SAID COMMONWEALTH."

IMMANUEL KANT'S PROLEGOMENA (1783) IDEA: @319: "There are many *LAWS* *OF*
*NATURE* {ie. #2184 ipso facto 6 x #364 - OBEDIENT(H7522) {#273 as [#6, #7,
#20, #200, #40] = zeker (H2143): 1) *REMEMBRANCE*}, 7 x #312 -
AIDING(H5826) {#273 as [#40, #50, #8, #40, #5, #10, #70, #50] = mnemeion
(G3419): 1) *SEPULCHRE*}, 7 x #273 - ASSISTING / DEVOTE ONESELF(H5144)
{#273 as [#1, #200, #9, #5, #50, #8] = asthenes (G0772 ): 1) *WEAK*;
*INCAPACITY*} UNTO THE GOVERNOR GENERAL IS A REQUIREMENT OF ALL CITIZENS
UNDER SECTION VIII OF QUEEN VICTORIA’S LETTERS PATENT} that we can know
only through experience, but lawfulness in the connection of appearances,
i.e., nature in general, we cannot come to know through any experience,
because experience itself has need of such laws, which lie a priori at the
basis of its possibility.

OBEDIENT(H7522)@{
   @1: Sup: 6 (#6); Ego: 6 (#6),
   @2: Sup: 8 (#14); Ego: 2 (#8),
   @3: Sup: 46 (#60); Ego: 38 (#46),
   @4: Sup: 55 (#115 - I AM NOT A SLAYER OF MEN {%5}); Ego: 9 (#55),
   @5: Sup: 61 (#176); Ego: 6 (#61),
   @6: Sup: 30 (#206); Ego: 50 (#111),
   @7: Sup: 40 (#246); Ego: 10 (#121),
   Male: #246; Feme: #121
}

H7522@{
   @1: Sup: 30 (#30); Ego: 30 (#30),
   @2: Sup: 68 (#98); Ego: 38 (#68 - I DO NOT THAT WHICH OFFENDETH THE GOD
OF MY DOMAIN {%42}),
   @3: Sup: 77 (#175 - I AM NOT A TRANSGRESSOR {%22}); Ego: 9 (#77),
   @4: Sup: 46 (#221); Ego: 50 (#127),
   @5: Sup: 66 (#287); Ego: 20 (#147),
   @6: Sup: 25 (#312); Ego: 40 (#187),
   Male: #312; Feme: #187
} // #430

T'AI HSÜAN CHING {POLAR OPPOSITIONS / INTERPLAY OF OPPOSITES} [4 BCE]:

UMBRA: #346 % #41 = #18 - Origin of Ethical Concepts, Palliation of
Vulgarity; I-Ching: H33 - Withdrawal, Retiring, Retreat, Yielding; Tetra:
49 - Flight;

THOTH MEASURE: #18 - Oh Tutuf, who makest thine appearance in Ati; *I*
*TROUBLE* *MYSELF* *ONLY* *WITH* *MY* *OWN* *AFFAIRS*.

    #VIRTUE: As to Waiting (no. #18), it exits.
    #TOOLS: As to Closing in (no. #58), it enters.
    #POSITION: As to Release (no. #21), it is softness, but
    #TIME: As to Hardness (no. #72), it is leathery toughness.
    #CANON: #169

ONTIC_OBLIGANS_169@{
   @1: Sup: 18 (#18); Ego: 18 (#18),
   @2: Sup: 76 (#94); Ego: 58 (#76),
   @3: Sup: 16 (#110); Ego: 21 (#97),
   @4: Sup: 7 (#117); Ego: 72 (#169 - I TROUBLE MYSELF ONLY WITH MY OWN
AFFAIRS {%18}),
   Male: #117; Feme: #169
} // #169 {#273 as [#6, #7, #20, #200, #40] = zeker (H2143): 1)
*REMEMBRANCE*}

#364 as [#6, #2, #200, #90, #6, #50, #10] / #430 as [#30, #200, #90, #50,
#20, #40] = ratsown (H7522): {UMBRA: #14 as #346 % #41 = #18} 1) pleasure,
delight, favour, goodwill, acceptance, will; 1a) goodwill, favour; 1b)
acceptance; 1c) will, desire, pleasure, self-will;

AIDING(H5826)@{
@1: Sup: 30 (#30); Ego: 30 (#30),
@2: Sup: 35 (#65); Ego: 5 (#35),
@3: Sup: 24 (#89); Ego: 70 (#105),
@4: Sup: 31 (#120); Ego: 7 (#112),
@5: Sup: 69 (#189); Ego: 38 (#150 - I INDULGE NOT IN ANGER {%28}),
Male: #189; Feme: #150
}

H5826@{
   @1: Sup: 40 (#40); Ego: 40 (#40),
   @2: Sup: 29 (#69); Ego: 70 (#110),
   @3: Sup: 36 (#105); Ego: 7 (#117),
   @4: Sup: 74 (#179); Ego: 38 (#155),
   @5: Sup: 3 (#182 - I AM NOT FRAUDULENT IN MEASURES OF GRAIN {%6}); Ego:
10 (#165),
   @6: Sup: 43 (#225); Ego: 40 (#205),
   Male: #225; Feme: #205
} // #367

T'AI HSÜAN CHING {POLAR OPPOSITIONS / INTERPLAY OF OPPOSITES} [4 BCE]:

UMBRA: #277 % #41 = #31 - Military Stratagem, Quelling War; I-Ching: H32 -
Perseverance, Endurance, Duration, Constancy; Tetra: 51 - Constancy;

THOTH MEASURE: #31 - Oh thou who hast different faces, and makest thine
appearance in Net'efit; *I* *AM* *NOT* *ONE* *OF* *INCONSTANT* *MIND*.

    #VIRTUE: With Packing (no. #31), a move home, but
    #TOOLS: With Stoppage (no. #71), a failure to proceed.
    #POSITION: With Stove (no. #44), love of profit.
    #TIME: With Law (no. #40), abhorrence of the cruel.
    #CANON: #186

ONTIC_OBLIGANS_186@{
   @1: Sup: 31 (#31); Ego: 31 (#31),
   @2: Sup: 21 (#52); Ego: 71 (#102 - I AM NOT RAPACIOUS {%4}),
   @3: Sup: 65 (#117); Ego: 44 (#146 - I AM NOT A LAND-GRABBER {%15}),
   @4: Sup: 24 (#141); Ego: 40 (#186 - I AM NOT ONE OF INCONSTANT MIND
{%31}),
   Male: #141; Feme: #186
} // #186 {#273 as [#40, #50, #8, #40, #5, #10, #70, #50] = mnemeion
(G3419): 1) *SEPULCHRE*}

#312 as [#30, #5, #70, #7, #200] / #367 as [#40, #70, #7, #200, #10, #40] =
âzar (H5826): {UMBRA: #4 as #277 % #41 = #31} 1) *TO* *HELP*, *SUCCOUR*,
*SUPPORT*; 1a) (Qal) to help; 1b) (Niphal) to be helped; 1c) (Hiphil) to
help;

DEVOTE ONESELF(H5144)@{
@1: Sup: 6 (#6); Ego: 6 (#6),
@2: Sup: 16 (#22); Ego: 10 (#16),
@3: Sup: 66 (#88); Ego: 50 (#66),
@4: Sup: 73 (#161 - I AM NOT A TELLER OF LIES {%9}); Ego: 7 (#73),
@5: Sup: 30 (#191 - I DO NOT STEAL THE SKINS OF THE SACRED ANIMALS
{%32}); Ego: 38 (#111),
Male: #191; Feme: #111
}

H5144@{
   @1: Sup: 6 (#6); Ego: 6 (#6),
   @2: Sup: 16 (#22); Ego: 10 (#16),
   @3: Sup: 66 (#88); Ego: 50 (#66),
   @4: Sup: 73 (#161 - I AM NOT A TELLER OF LIES {%9}); Ego: 7 (#73),
   @5: Sup: 30 (#191 - I DO NOT STEAL THE SKINS OF THE SACRED ANIMALS
{%32}); Ego: 38 (#111),
   @6: Sup: 36 (#227); Ego: 6 (#117),
   Male: #227; Feme: #117
} // #279

T'AI HSÜAN CHING {POLAR OPPOSITIONS / INTERPLAY OF OPPOSITES} [4 BCE]:

UMBRA: #257 % #41 = #11 - Value and Function of Non-Existence; I-Ching: H8
- Closeness, Seeking Unity, Grouping, Holding together, Alliance; Tetra: 33
- Closeness;

THOTH MEASURE: #11 - Oh thou of the Two Caverns, who makest thine
appearance in Amenta; *I* *AM* *NOT* *SLUGGISH*.

    #VIRTUE: Divergence (no. #11) means mistakes, but
    #TOOLS: Constancy (no. #51) is good.
    #POSITION: With Joy (no. #24), calm and composure.
    #TIME: With Labouring (no. #80), hustle and bustle.
    #CANON: #166

ONTIC_OBLIGANS_166@{
   @1: Sup: 11 (#11); Ego: 11 (#11),
   @2: Sup: 62 (#73); Ego: 51 (#62),
   @3: Sup: 5 (#78); Ego: 24 (#86 - I AM NOT A ROBBER OF FOOD {%10}),
   @4: Sup: 4 (#82); Ego: 80 (#166 - I AM NOT SLUGGISH {%11}),
   Male: #82; Feme: #166
} // #166 {#273 as [#1, #200, #9, #5, #50, #8] = asthenes (G0772 ): 1)
*WEAK*; *INCAPACITY*}

#273 as [#6, #10, #50, #7, #200] / #279 as [#6, #10, #50, #7, #200, #6] =
nazar (H5144): {UMBRA: #4 as #257 % #41 = #11} 1) to dedicate, consecrate,
separate; 2) (Hiphil) to be a Nazarite, live as a Nazarite; 1a) (Niphal) to
dedicate oneself, devote oneself; 1b) (Hiphil) to keep sacredly separate;
2) *SOVEREIGN*; *ONE* *CHOSEN* *OR* *SET* *APART*; *SEPARATED*; *CROWNED*;
SANCTIFIED;

MR PETER ANTHONY RIDDELL, affirmed [9.36am]

THE D.PRESIDENT: Recording. Thank you. Now, if you would play the tape

MR RIDDELL: If it is not clear please let me know and I will adjust the
volume.

THE D.PRESIDENT: Certainly.

TELEPHONE MESSAGE ONE: "Mr Riddell, this is Dolf Boek [calling]. I'm just
wondering whether you['ve been self congratulatory about my previous
submissions to the court and have failed to recognise their transcendent
logic built on time]. They are religious model that co-ordinates or
synchronises over 6000 years to the 9 September of this year. That means
[when this year expires,] my court case will be a matter of an accusation
of fascism against yourself at the company from which I will not cease
until I have your #419 - SOUL.

You may return this message if you like, [number omitted]. You have until
the end of this year and then I would never again turn my hand against the
action that I am going to take. Meaning? I will conclude when one of us
going to the #390 - GRAVE."

TELEPHONE MESSAGE TWO: "Mr Riddell, Dolf Boek. You do realise that if you
are not prepared to come clean with your justifications of your past
treatment of me that as of the new year we will not be having another
contract because I will not be co-operating with you further and we will
are more likely to go to court at some stage. At some stage you are going
to have to recognise the fact that you are a blasphemer. Your religious
context has no continuing validity and since I am able to rationally prove
that with a mathematical model..... you are going to understand how
forceful and hard metaphysics is."

MR RIDDELL: That concludes the two voice mail messages.

...

MR RIDDELL: - - - submission that Mr Boek has conducted himself in such a
way that he shows he has no intention of according to the rules of the
court. He has indicated quite clearly that his court case will now be a
matter of fascism against myself and AXA and in those circumstances a false
claim is frivolous and vexatious and should be struck out forthwith.

THE D.PRESIDENT: Boek. Mr Boek? Very well, all right. Now, I will hear from
Mr

MR BOEK: Yes, ma'am, I have - you would have noticed that there were no
actual words of threat. They were words that were based on fact in that
particular phone call. Here I have a particular mathematical model which is
mentioned in that particular phone call. It is based upon a work by Johann
Kepler, a German astronomer born in 1571 to 1630. He came up with three
rules of which I have come up with a fourth [associated to the ephemeral
and mundane as a transcendent fecundite connection to the Vernal and the
Autumn Equinox in the 6th year of the 22nd Course of Gamul: 7 x 24 x 13 x
49 = 6J or 294 x 364 days or 365.2423 x 293 years - Vernal Equinox
Wednesday 20 March 1996 / 21 March].

His three rules in terms of astronomical cycles were: (1) that the
planet... And then I will get to my bit of relevance to the 6000 years.

THE D.PRESIDENT: Yes, yes, yes.

MR BOEK: (1) That the planets move in elliptical orbits around the sun
which is situated at one of the focus of the ellipses; (2) that the radius
vectors joining each planet to the sun describes equal areas in equal
times; (3) that the ratio of the square of the planet's year to the cube of
the planet's mean distance from the sun is the same for each planet.

Now, what I am suggesting is that the 6000 year cycle fits a mathematical
model on logic and reason called Telos equals Arch plus C-squared:

Telos [122J3W1D] = Arch [3W1D] + c² [9(9²+1)/2]

That has been my particular field of study as my retirement activity. A
religious pursuit which is, how can I say, an area of contemplative life.
The best model that can currently be exhibited with regards to this
particular thesis is nothing more than Harry Potter and the Philosopher
Stone. I raise that as a particular point because the poetry that is used
in...

HYPOTEÍNOUSA (verb):
- to hypothesise by ratiocination within measured bounds of division
without an incommensurate bias.

(noun):
- [GEOMETRY]: the side of a right triangle opposite the right angle.
- Also: hypothenuse.

ETYMOLOGY:
The word hypotenuse comes from Late Latin hypotēnūsa, a transliteration of
Ancient Greek ὑποτείνουσα [πλευρά] (hypoteínousa [pleurá]), meaning "[side]
subtending [the right angle]". The word was used for the hypotenuse of a
triangle c. 360 BCE by Plato in the Timaeus (dialogue) 54d and by many
other ancient authors.

#1586 as [#400, #80, #70, #300, #5, #10, #50, #70, #400, #200, #1] as 'You
Need Me Day And Night Gematria'

HYPOTENUSE@{
@1: Sup: 76 (#76); Ego: 76 (#76),
@2: Sup: 75 (#151); Ego: 80 (#156),
@3: Sup: 64 (#215); Ego: 70 (#226),
@4: Sup: 40 (#255); Ego: 57 (#283),
@5: Sup: 45 (#300); Ego: 5 (#288 - *UMBRA*), <-- *MAPPED* *TO*
*EGYPTIAN* *ANKH* / *ROMAN* *IMPERIAL* *EMPIRE* *GOVERNANCE* *PROTOTYPE*
#EIGHT: #120 / #360 AND TORAH PROTOTYPE #THREE: #96 / #288
@6: Sup: 55 (#355); Ego: 10 (#298),
@7: Sup: 24 (#379); Ego: 50 (#348),
@8: Sup: 13 (#392); Ego: 70 (#418),
@9: Sup: 8 (#400 - *TAU*); Ego: 76 (#494),
@10: Sup: 46 (#446); Ego: 38 (#532),
@11: Sup: 47 (#493); Ego: 1 (#533),
Male: #493; Feme: #533
} // #1586 <-- *UNITED* *NATIONS* *HUMAN* *RIGHTS* *COUNCIL*

A folk etymology incorrectly claims that tenuse means "side" and hypotenuse
means a support like a prop or buttress

ORIGIN: 1565–75; earlier hypotenusa < Latin hypotēnūsa < Greek hypoteínousa
(grámmē) subtending (line) (feminine present participle of hypoteínein to
subtend), equivalent to hypo- hypo- + tein- stretch (see thin) + -ousa
feminine present participle suffix

Within geometry, a hypotenuse (rarely: hypothenuse) is the longest side of
a right-angled triangle, the side opposite of the right angle. The length
of the hypotenuse of a right triangle can be found using the Pythagorean
theorem, which states that the square of the length of the hypotenuse
equals the sum of the squares of the lengths of the other two sides. For
example, if one of the other sides has a length of 3 (when squared, 9) and
the other has a length of 4 (when squared, 16), then their squares add up
to 25. The length of the hypotenuse is the square root of 25, that is, 5.

PHILOSOPHICAL USE:
Whereas *OUSIA* (Greek: οὐσία) is analogous to the English concepts of
being and *ONTIC* used in contemporary philosophy. *OUSIA* is translated as
Latin substantia and essentia, and hence to English as substance and
essence.

Aristotle defined protai ousiai (πρῶται οὐσίαι), "primary substances", in
the Categories as that which is neither said of nor in any subject, eg.,
"this human" in particular, or "this ox". The genera in biology and other
natural kinds are substances in a secondary sense, as universals, formally
defined by the essential qualities of the primary substances; i.e., the
individual members of those kinds.

Much later, Martin Heidegger said that the original meaning of the word
*OUSIA* was lost in its translation to the Latin, and, subsequently, in its
translation to modern languages. For him, *OUSIA* means Being, not
substance, that is, not some thing or some being that "stood" (-stance)
"under" (sub-). Moreover, he also uses the binomial parousia–apousia,
denoting presence–absence, and [relativity within the] *HYPOSTASIS*
denoting existence.

THEOLOGICAL SIGNIFICANCE:
The word *OUSIA* is not used in the New Testament except in relation to the
substance in the sense of goods twice in the parable of the Prodigal Son
where the son asked his father to divide to him his inheritance, and then
wasted it on riotous living.

An apparently related word, epiousios (affixing the prefix epi- to the
word), is used in the Lord's Prayer, but nowhere else in the scriptures.
<https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ousia>

<http://www.grapple369.com/images/EarthSeasons.png>

[IMAGE: Earth’s elliptical orbit around the sun accounts for points of
least and greatest center-to-center distances between the two celestial
bodies; mean values for the orbit’s two extremes are 152,000,000+
kilometers for aphelion and 147,000,000+ kilometers for perihelion: Gothika
(vector image from Horst Frank/German Wikipedia drawing), CC BY SA 3.0, via
Wikimedia Commons @ <https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Seasons1.svg>]

YOUTUBE: "Wake Me Up (Avicii [Tim Bergling RIP: 20 April 2018])"

<https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=yVjjuOqMQIw>

The commentary which was published within 4 BCE on the Tetragram #16 -
CONTACT given by the CANON OF SUPREME MYSTERY (T’AI HSUAN CHING) as
meta-descriptor (ie. outside time) prototypes which formed the non
encapsulated as artifice basis of the Chinese DAOist (206 BCE to 220 CE)
Empirical governance which had its Grand Inception on the midnight new moon
of the solstice on 21 December 103 BCE (and which continues to this day),
it specifically states: “*THE* *WISE* *PERSON* (ie. HOMO [iOS] SAPIEN [T])
*AVOIDS* *CONTACT* *WITH* *LESSER*, *BESTIAL* *MEN* {

<http://www.grapple369.com/images/fascist.gif>

[IMAGE: TRUTH IS A COSMOGONIC CONSIDERATION AFTER ALL:

1) Telos (6,000 as 122J3W1D) = Arch (#0 as 22/7 = 3W1D) + c² is a genuine
Sabbath based PARADIGM [Exodus 20:8; Deuteronomy 5:15]

As the relativity and grounding of the Infinite to the temporal reality
(ie. the phenomenology as the deterministic unfolding of history) which is
implied by the notion of rational PI and the cosmogonical Genesis reprise
{#0} of the lunar / solar cycle occurring on the equinox of Wednesday 20th
March 1996 / New Moon on Thursday 21st March 1996.

2) Pythagorean Theorem: c² = a² + b² is fascist (see discussion below) and
now redundant as only a METHODOLOGY]

} *LEST* *HE* *BE* *INFLUENCED *FOR* *THE* *WORSE*:

<http://www.grapple369.com/images/MALI_ART.jpeg>

[IMAGE: MALI ART OF THE PROPHET MUHAMMAD]

MALEFICENT (adjective): literary causing harm or destruction, especially by
supernatural means. - Astrology relating to the planets Saturn (#15) and
Mars (#65), traditionally considered to have an unfavourable influence.

MALFEASANCE (noun): (LAW) the performance by a public official of an act
that is legally unjustified, harmful, or contrary to law; wrongdoing used
especially of an act in violation of a public trust; Word of the Day for 1
March 2017; www.dictionary.com

However this MALFEASANCE is unlawful conduct by a public authority such as
the Victoria Police or the Returned Services League (RSL) under Section
38(1) to (3) of the Charter of Human Rights and Responsibilities No. 43 of
Act 2006, which states: “(1) Subject to this section, *IT* *IS* *UNLAWFUL*
*FOR* *A* *PUBLIC* *AUTHORITY* *TO* *ACT* *IN* *A* *WAY* *THAT* *IS*
*INCOMPATIBLE* *WITH* *A* *HUMAN* *RIGHT* *OR*, *IN* *MAKING* *A*
*DECISION*, *TO* *FAIL* *TO* *GIVE* *PROPER* *CONSIDERATION* *TO* *A*
*RELEVANT* *HUMAN* *RIGHT*.

There are several legal issues involved with respects to [the] Saint
Andrews Cause Célèbre participated in by the representatives of the
Returned Service League as Public Authority and the nature of its
association to a FOREIGN POWER as a group named KNIGHTS TEMPLARS
INTERNATIONAL which formed within 2015 and comprises various: RELIGIONS /
STATES / MILITARY / ORGANISATIONS / INSTITUTIONS as unconscionable attempts
made by them to impose a substituted ethic @5 against the INTELLECTUS AS
GENITIVE VOLUNTĀTUS whether by NEGLECT or forced WILL upon our War Dead
and to usurp @1 the Sovereignty embodied within the Governor General as
ANTHROPIC COSMOLOGICAL PRINCIPLE.

<http://www.grapple369.com/images/Templar%20Saint%20Andrews.JPG>

<http://www.grapple369.com/images/Knights%20Mantra.jpg>

[IMAGES: THE KNIGHTS TEMPLAR INTERNATIONAL AS SAINT ANDREWS CAUSE CÉLÈBRE
HAS A SUBSTITUTED ETHOS AS MANTRA: "FOR THOSE BRAVE WHO GAVE THEIR LIVES SO
WE COULD LIVE OURS"]

THEREFORE THE INTERDICTION: “GOD SAVE THE QUEEN FROM YOU FASCISTS” given
the impunity against the DIGNITY ROYAL as an OAK TREE PLANTING upon 27
OCTOBER 1934 BY HIS ROYAL HIGHNESS PRINCE HENRY DUKE OF GLOUCESTER
expressed as *CARPE* *DIEM* upon the SATURDAY of 28 OCTOBER 2017 at a
distance of some 40 to 60 metres within the street to passing persons whom
paused and laughed with absolute conviction as derision by means of #325
{#5x#5 = #65 - *SOLDIER*} - DETRUDE MORE PROPERLY DEFINED AS A CONTEMPT BY
MALFEASANCE AS UNLAWFUL CONDUCT BY A PUBLIC AUTHORITY.

G3622@{
@1: Sup: 70 (#70); Ego: 70 (#70),
@2: Sup: 80 (#150); Ego: 10 (#80),
@3: Sup: 19 (#169); Ego: 20 (#100),
@4: Sup: 8 (#177); Ego: 70 (#170),
@5: Sup: 58 (#235 - ADOLF HITLER'S TABLE TALK IDEA @235 ON 7 JUNE 1942
AS SHOOTING ONE HUNDRED AND THIRTY OF THESE SELF-STYLED BIBLE STUDENTS
(BIBELFORSCHER}); Ego: 50 (#220),
@6: Sup: 47 (#282); Ego: 70 (#290),
@7: Sup: 6 (#288 - UMBRA / 11 SEPTEMBER 2001 (HETEROS) / BEERSHEBA /
ANTI-SEMITISM); Ego: 40 (#330), <-- *MAPPED* *TO* *EGYPTIAN* *ANKH* /
*ROMAN* *IMPERIAL* *EMPIRE* *GOVERNANCE* *PROTOTYPES* #EIGHT: #120 / #360
@8: Sup: 16 (#304); Ego: 10 (#340),
@9: Sup: 17 (#321 as *PRO* *DOMO* (G156): BEING (LOGICAL) REASON
(MOTIVE, MATTER), (LEGAL) CRIME (ALLEGED OR PROVED)); Ego: 1 (#341 - *TO*
*PUT* *A* *NAME* *UPON*, *NAME* AS #444 - *SPORT* / *31ST* *DECEMBER* *AS*
*END**OF* *TROPICAL* *YEAR*),
@10: Sup: 67 (#388); Ego: 50 (#391),
Male: #388; Feme: #391
} // #391

REGARDING PRINCIPLE OF #312 - *CONTRADICTION* {#364 x 4 + #371 = #1827 -
ROMAN CATHOLIC LITURGICAL BLASPHEMY}

V'S

PRINCIPLE OF #391 - HOMOGENEOUS STEWARDSHIP {#2184 - (#390 + #312 + #390) =
#1092 as ‘OTH CYCLE of 3 x #364 / 4 = #273 - *MOMENT*}

#371 as [#30, #40, #100, #200, #1] = miqra' (H4744): {UMBRA: #4 as #341 %
#41 = #13 *AS* *DATA* *MANIPULATION* *BEING* *EVIDENCE* *OF* *AN*
*INTENTION* *TO* *HIJACK* *WORLD* *WAR* *ONE* *CENTENNIAL* #288 -
*MEMORIAL* COMMEMORATIONS AS SAINT ANDREWS 30 NOVEMBER CAUSE CÉLÈBRE BY
INCESSANT LIEUTENANTS OF ROMAN CATHOLIC / FREEMASONRY KNIGHTS TEMPLAR
INTERNATIONAL BEING A NEO-FASCIST FOREIGN POWER BY IMPOST OF AN ABHORRENT
RELIGIOUS PRACTICE THAT IS PROHIBITED UNDER SECTION 116 OF THE AUSTRALIAN
CONSTITUTION} 1) convocation, convoking, reading, a calling together; 1a)
convocation, *SACRED* *ASSEMBLY*; 1b) convoking; 1c) reading;

#371 as [#6, #70, #90, #200, #5] = `atsarah (H6116): {UMBRA: #5 as #365 %
#41 = #37 *AS* *DATA* MANIPULATION TO THE SOLAR YEAR CYCLE ENDING 31
DECEMBER: #341 / #444} 1) assembly, solemn assembly; 1a) *ASSEMBLY*
(*SACRED* *OR* *FESTIVE* *MEETING*); 1b) *ASSEMBLAGE*, #123 - *COMPANY*,
#369 - *GROUP*.

#391 as [#70, #10, #20, #70, #50, #70, #40, #10, #1, #50] = oikonomia
(G3622): {UMBRA: #11 as #341 % #41 = #13 AS DATA MANIPULATION TO *31ST*
*DECEMBER* *AS* *END**OF* *TROPICAL* *YEAR*} 1) *THE* *MANAGEMENT* *OF*
*A* *HOUSEHOLD* *OR* *OF* *HOUSEHOLD* *AFFAIRS*; 1a) specifically, the
management, oversight, administration, of other's property; 1b) the office
of a manager or overseer, stewardship; 1c) administration, dispensation;

#391 as [#70, #40, #70, #10, #1, #200] = homoios (G3664): {UMBRA: #12 as
#460 % #41 = #9} 1) like, similar, resembling; 1a) like: ie. resembling;
1b) like: ie. corresponding to a thing;

#541 as [#70, #10, #20, #70, #50, #70, #40, #10, #1, #200] = oikonomia
(G3622): {UMBRA: #56 as #541 % #41 = #8} 1) *THE* *MANAGEMENT* *OF* *A*
*HOUSEHOLD* *OR* *OF* *HOUSEHOLD* *AFFAIRS*; 1a) specifically, the
management, oversight, administration, of other's property; 1b) the office
of a manager or overseer, stewardship; 1c) administration, dispensation;

#541 as [#5, #70, #2, #4, #400, #50, #10] = `abad (H5647): {UMBRA: #42 as
#541 % #41 = #8} 1) to work, serve; 1a) (Qal); 1a1) to labour, work, do
work; 1a2) to work for another, serve another by labour; 1a3) to serve as
subjects; 1a4) to serve (God); 1a5) to serve (with Levitical service); 1b)
(Niphal); 1b1) to be worked, be tilled (of land); 1b2) to make oneself a
servant; 1c) (Pual) to be worked; 1d) (Hiphil); 1d1) to compel to labour or
work, cause to labour, cause to serve; 1d2) to cause to serve as subjects;
1e) (Hophal) to be led or enticed to serve;

#541 as [#50, #1, #90, #400] = na'ats (H5006): {UMBRA: #31 as #541 % #41 =
#8} 1) to spurn, contemn, despise, abhor; 1a) (Qal) to spurn, contemn; 1b)
(Piel); 1b1) to spurn; 1b2) to cause to contemn; 1c) (Hiphil) to spurn; 1d)
(Hithpolel) to be contemned;

#541 as [#1, #80, #70, #20, #300, #5, #50, #5, #10] = apokteino (G615):
{UMBRA: #60 as #541 % #41 = #8} 1) to kill in any way whatever; 2) metaph.
to extinguish, abolish; 1a) to destroy, to allow to perish; 2a) to inflict
mortal death; 2b) to deprive of spiritual life and procure eternal misery
in hell;

It also provides understanding of the underlying methodology as the
precedent PRO DOMO IDEA (12 MAY 1942) @215 / @235 (7 JUNE 1942) assigned to
ADOLF HITLER’S (1941 - 1944) TABLE TALK depiction as the shooting of one
hundred and thirty bible students whom were indicted by the highest
military court of the Wehrmacht charged with demoralization of the armed
forces.

THE #41 - ONTIC_OBLIGANS NECESSITY REVERSE TRANSCRIPTASE IDEA @215 - I AM
NEITHER A LIAR NOR A DOER OF MISCHIEF {%34}

#325 (PYTHAGOREAN ESOTERIC VALUE FOR #65 - *SOLDIER* AND KNIGHTS TEMPLAR
INTERNATIONAL AS UNLAWFUL FOREIGN POWER) as [#5, #50, #70, #200] = heis
(G1520): {UMBRA: #12 as #215 % #41 = #10} 1) *ONE*

#235 as [#20, #7, #200, #8] = zarach (H2224): {UMBRA: #1 as #215 % #41 =
#10} 1) *TO* *RISE*, *COME* *FORTH*, *BREAK* *OUT*, *ARISE*, *RISE* *UP*,
*SHINE*; 1a) (Qal); 1a1) to rise; 1a2) to come out, appear;

#175 {MARRIAGE} (@4 - NATURE AMENDED IN ITS NATURE: #369 - Autonomous
Nature [#205 - DO NOT STEAL]) ...

210: [30 - I AM NOT OF AGGRESSIVE HAND]
215: [34 - I AM NEITHER A LIAR NOR A DOER OF MISCHIEF]
220: [38 - I CURSE NOT A GOD]
228: [40 - I HAVE NO UNJUST PREFERENCES]

TOTAL: @210 + @215 + @220 + @228 = #873 - PRINCIPLE OF THE PERSISTENCE OF
SUBSTANCE as [#80, #5, #100, #10, #70, #600, #8] = perioche (G4042):
{UMBRA: #873 % #41 = #12} 1) an encompassing, compass, circuit; 2) that
which is contained; 2a) the contents of any writing SUCH AS QUEEN VICTORIAS
LETTERS PATENT OF 29 OCTOBER 1900 AS DICTUM OF #2184 - FREEDOM from #1827 -
OPPRESSION is:

#902 - RULE OF LAW (EGALITÉ {9 JULY 1900}: #22 x #41 as *ONTIC* necessity
comprising a subset of 21 consonants with #VOWELS of Semitic origins),

#492 - VOLUNTARY FREE WILL (LIBERTÉ {17 SEPTEMBER 1900}: #12 X #41), and

#391 - HOMOGENIOUS PRINCIPLES (FRATERNITÉ {29 OCTOBER 1900}) OF CIVIL
SOCIETY

That inhumanity as a lack of sapience is then an endless conflict against
nature itself."

The possibility of experience in general is thus at the same time the
universal law of nature, and the principles of the former are themselves
the laws of the latter. For we are not acquainted with nature except as the
sum total of appearances, i.e., of the representations in us, and so we
cannot get the laws of their connection from anywhere else except the
*PRINCIPLES* {ie. #390 + #312 + #390 = #1092 or #364 + #312 + #728 + #390 +
#390 = @2184} *OF* *THEIR* *CONNECTION* *IN* *US*, i.e., *FROM* *THE*
*CONDITIONS* *OF* *NECESSARY* *UNIFICATION* *IN* *ONE* *CONSCIOUSNESS*,
*WHICH* *UNIFICATION* *CONSTITUTES* *THE* *POSSIBILITY* *OF* *EXPERIENCE*."
[page 70]

SECTION VI: "And whereas by 'The Commonwealth of Australia Constitution Act
1900,' {#902 - RULE OF LAW (EGALITÉ {9 JULY 1900}} it is amongst other
things enacted, that we may authorise the GOVERNOR GENERAL to APPOINT any
person or persons, jointly or severally, to be his DEPUTY OR DEPUTIES:
{#2184 - LAWS OF NATURE AS ANTHROPOLOGICAL COSMOLOGICAL PRINCIPLE / 14 =
#156 - I DO NOT CAUSE TERRORS {%21}} within any part of Our Commonwealth,
and in that capacity to exercise, during the pleasure of the GOVERNOR
GENERAL such POWERS, and FUNCTIONS of the said GOVERNOR GENERAL as he
thinks fit to assign to such DEPUTY OR DEPUTIES, subject to any #168 -
*LIMITATIONS* and directions as aforesaid, to APPOINT any person or
persons, jointly or severally. To be his DEPUTY OR DEPUTIES within any part
of Our said Commonwealth of Australia, and in that capacity to exercise,
during his pleasure, such of his POWERS and FUNCTIONS, as he may deem it
necessary or expedient to assign to him or them: Provided always, that the
APPOINTMENT of such a DEPUTY OR DEPUTIES shall not affect the exercise by
the GOVERNOR GENERAL himself of any POWER or FUNCTION."

SECTION VII: "And We do hereby declare Our pleasure to be that, in the
event of death, #273 - INCAPACITY, removal, or absence of Our said GOVERNOR
GENERAL out of Our said Commonwealth, and all and EVERY THE POWERS AND
AUTHORITIES herein granted to him shall until Our further pleasure is
signified therein, be vested in such person as may be APPOINTED by Us under
Our Sign Manual and Signet to be Our LIEUTENANT GOVERNOR of Our said
Commonwealth: or if there shall be no such LIEUTENANT GOVERNOR in Our said
Commonwealth, then in such person or persons as may be APPOINTED by Us
under Our Sign Manual and Signet to administer the Government of the same.
No SUCH POWERS OR AUTHORITIES SHALL VEST in such LIEUTENANT GOVERNOR, or
such other person or persons, UNTIL HE OR THEY SHALL HAVE TAKEN THE #108 -
*OATHS* *APPOINTED* {

"They clave to their brethren, their nobles, and entered into a curse, and
into an oath, to walk in God's law, which was given by Moses the servant of
God, and to observe and do all the commandments of the LORD our Lord, and
his judgments and his statutes {#108 as [#8, #100] = choq (H2706):
statute};" [Nehemiah 10:29 (KJV)]

} to be taken by the GOVERNOR GENERAL of Our said Commonwealth, and in the
manner provided by the Instructions accompanying these Our Letters Patent."

ASSOCIATED TO THE DIGNITY ROYAL AS SUI JURIS / MEMBRUM VIRILE #390 -
SOVEREIGN ENTITLEMENT {#2184 - LAWS OF NATURE AS ANTHROPOLOGICAL
COSMOLOGICAL PRINCIPLE / 21 = #104 - COMMIT NO FRAUD {%7}}:

H5157@{
   @1: Sup: 10 (#10); Ego: 10 (#10),
   @2: Sup: 60 (#70); Ego: 50 (#60),
   @3: Sup: 68 (#138); Ego: 8 (#68 - I DO NOT THAT WHICH OFFENDETH THE GOD
OF MY DOMAIN {%42}),
   @4: Sup: 17 (#155); Ego: 30 (#98),
   @5: Sup: 23 (#178); Ego: 6 (#104 - I COMMIT NO FRAUD {%7}),
   Male: #178; Feme: #104
} // #104

T'AI HSÜAN CHING {POLAR OPPOSITIONS / INTERPLAY OF OPPOSITES} [4 BCE]:

UMBRA: #104 % #41 = #22 - Point to Reversal?, Humility's Increase; I-Ching:
H8 - Closeness, Seeking Unity, Grouping, Holding together, Alliance; Tetra:
34 - Kinship;

THOTH MEASURE: #22 - Oh Chemiu, who makest thine appearance in Kauu; I am
not a transgressor.

    #VIRTUE: What Resistance (no. #22) approves is right while
    #TOOLS: What Doubt (no. #62) abhors is wrong.
    #POSITION: With Advance (no. #20), the desire to proceed.
    #TIME: With Stoppage (no. #71), the desire for constraints.
    #CANON: #175

ONTIC_OBLIGANS_175@{
   @1: Sup: 22 (#22); Ego: 22 (#22),
   @2: Sup: 3 (#25); Ego: 62 (#84 - I AM NOT A MAN OF VIOLENCE {%2}),
   @3: Sup: 23 (#48); Ego: 20 (#104 - I COMMIT NO FRAUD {%7}),
   @4: Sup: 13 (#61); Ego: 71 (#175 - I AM NOT A TRANSGRESSOR {%22}),
   Male: #61; Feme: #175
} // #175

#104 as [#10, #50, #8, #30, #6] = nachal (H5157): {UMBRA: #16 as #104 % #41
= #22} 1) to get as a possession, acquire, inherit, possess; 1a) (Qal);
1a1) to take possession, inherit; 1a2) to have or get as a possession or
property (fig.); 1a3) to divide the land for a possession; 1a4) to acquire
(testimonies) (fig.); 1b) (Piel) to divide for a possession; 1c) (Hithpael)
to possess oneself of; 1d) (Hiphil); 1d1) to give as a possession; 1d2) to
cause to inherit, give as an inheritance; 1e) (Hophal) to be allotted, be
made to possess;

SECTION IX: “And We do hereby reserve to Ourselves Our #104 - HEIRS AND
SUCCESSORS, FULL POWER AND AUTHORITY FROM TIME TO TIME TO REVOKE, ALTER, OR
AMEND these Our Letters Patent, as to Us or THEM SHALL SEEM MEET.”

If they are considered as fundamental laws of the empirical use of the
understanding, at the same time carry with them an expression of necessity,
hence at least the presumption of being determined from grounds that are
valid a priori and before all experience. But all #2184 - *LAWS* *OF*
*NATURE*, without distinction, fall under higher principles of the
understanding, since they merely apply such principles to particular cases
of appearance.

... The table of categories provides us with completely natural
instructions [IDEA: @A161 / @B200] for the table of principles, since these
principles are indeed nothing other than rules for the objective use of the
categories." [pages 180 - 181]

IMMANUEL KANT'S PROLEGOMENA (1783 AS APRIORITY TO FRENCH REVOLUTION) IDEA:
@B252 SECOND ANALOGY: PRINCIPLE OF TIME-SUCCESSION ACCORDING TO THE LAW OF
CAUSALITY

ALL ALTERATIONS TAKE PLACE IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE LAW OF THE CONNECTION OF
CAUSE AND EFFECT.
PROOF: I perceive that appearances succeed one another, that is, that
[IDEA: @B233] one state of a thing exists at one time, the opposite of
which existed in the previous state. I am therefore actually connecting two
perceptions in time. Now connection is no act of mere sense and intuition,
but is here the product of a synthetic faculty of the imagination that
determines the inner sense with respect to relation in time. The
imagination can however conjoin the aforementioned two states in two
different ways, so that either one or the other would precede in time; for
time cannot be perceived in itself and what precedes and what follows in
objects determined, as it were empirically, in relation to it. I am
therefore conscious only that my imagination places one state before, the
other after, not that in the object [IDEA: @B234] one precedes the other;
or, in other words, the objective relation of the appearances that succeed
one another remains undetermined through mere perception. In order then for
this relation to be cognized as determined, the relation between the two
states must be so thought that it is thereby determined with necessity
which of them must be placed before, which after, and not the reverse.
However, the concept that carries with it a necessity of synthetic unity
can only be a pure concept of the understanding, which does not lie in
perception – and here it is the concept of the relation of cause and
effect, in which the former determines the latter in time as consequence,
and not merely as something that could precede it in the imagination (or
not be perceived at all). It is, then, only because we subject the
succession of appearances, hence all alterations, to the law of causality
that experience itself – i.e., empirical cognition of the appearances – is
possible; hence the appearances themselves as objects of experience are
possible only in accordance with this very law.

The apprehension of the manifold of appearances is always successive.
[IDEA: @A189] The representations of the parts succeed one another. Whether
they also succeed one another in the object is a further point for
reflection, which is not included in the first point. Now one can in fact
call everything, and even every representation insofar as one is conscious
of it, an object; but it is a matter for deeper investigation what this
word is to signify regarding [IDEA: @B235] appearances, not insofar as they
(as representations) [A: @190] are objects, but only in so far as they
designate an object. In as much as they, merely as representations, are at
the same time objects of consciousness, they are not at all to be
distinguished from apprehension, i.e., reception into the synthesis of the
imagination, and one must then say: that the manifold of appearances is
always generated successively in the mind. Were appearances things in
themselves, then no human being would be able to conclude from the
succession of representations how the manifold of those appearances might
be conjoined in the object. For in the end we have to do only with our own
representations; how things in themselves may be (without regard to
representations through which they affect us) is completely beyond our
sphere of cognition. Now although the appearances are not things in
themselves, and nevertheless are the only thing that can be given to us for
cognition, I still have to show what in the appearances themselves may suit
the manifold for a conjoining in time, notwithstanding that its
representation in apprehension is always successive. Thus, for example, the
apprehension of the manifold in the appearances of a house that stands
before me is successive. Now the question is: whether the manifold of this
house itself also is successive in itself, which of course no one will
grant. However, as soon as I raise my concept of an object up to
transcendental significance, the house is now indeed no thing in itself,
but [IDEA: @B236] only an appearance, i.e., a representation, whose
transcendental object is [IDEA: @A191] unknown; what, then, shall I
understand by the question: how might the manifold be conjoined in the
appearance itself (which is still nothing in itself )? That which lies in
the successive apprehension is here viewed as representation, while the
appearance that is given to me, notwithstanding that it is nothing more
than a sum of such representations, is viewed as their object – with which
my concept, which I extract from the representations of apprehension, has
to agree. Since truth is the agreement of cognition with object, it can
easily be seen that here one can ask only about the formal conditions of
empirical truth, and that appearance, in counter-relation with the
representations of apprehension, can only be represented as their object
that is distinct from them if it falls under a rule that distinguishes it
from every other apprehension and makes one way of conjoining the manifold
necessary. That in the appearance which contains the condition of this
necessary rule of apprehension is the object.

Let us now proceed to our problem. That something happens – i.e., that
something, or some state, comes to be that wasn’t there before – [IDEA:
@B237] cannot be perceived empirically unless preceded by an appearance
that [IDEA: @A192] does not contain this state in itself; for a reality
following upon an empty time, hence, a coming to be that no state of things
precedes, can be apprehended just as little as empty time itself. Every
apprehension of an event is therefore a perception that follows upon
another perception. Since this is, though, the case with every synthesis of
apprehension, as I have shown above in the appearance of a house, it does
not in this way yet distinguish itself from the others. But I also note:
that if, in an appearance containing a happening, I call the preceding
state of perception A and the succeeding one B, then B can only follow A in
the apprehension, while the perception a cannot follow but only precede B.
I see for example a ship drifting downstream. My perception of its location
further down succeeds the perception of its location further up the course
of the river, and it is impossible that in the apprehension of this
appearance the ship should first be perceived further downstream but
afterwards further upstream. Here, then, the order in the succession of
perceptions in the apprehension is determined, and the apprehension is
bound by that order. In the previous example of a house, in the
apprehension my perceptions could start at [IDEA: @B238] the top of the
house and end with the ground, or else start from below and end above, just
as they could apprehend the manifold of empirical intuition from the right
or the left. In the series of these perceptions there [IDEA: @A193] was,
then, no determined order making it necessary when in the apprehension I
had to begin in order to conjoin the manifold empirically. This rule is,
however, always to be met with in the perception of something that happens,
and it makes the order of the perceptions succeeding one another (in the
apprehension of this appearance) necessary.

In our case, therefore, I will have to derive the subjective sequence of
the apprehension from the objective sequence of the appearances, because
otherwise the former is completely undetermined and does not distinguish
any one appearance from the rest. By itself the former proves nothing about
the connection of the manifold in the object, because it is completely
arbitrary. This connection will therefore consist in the order of the
manifold of the appearance according to which the apprehension of the one
(what happens) follows upon that of the other (which precedes) according to
a rule. Only in this way can I gain the right to say of the appearance
itself, and not merely of my apprehension: that in it a sequence is to be
found – which is as much as to say that I cannot institute the apprehension
otherwise than exactly in this sequence. [CAMBRIDGE TEXTS IN THE HISTORY OF
PHILOSOPHY, Kant's Prolegomena to Any Future Metaphysics, SECOND ANALOGY of
ANALYTIC OF PRINCIPLES, pp 184-187]

YOUR COUNTRY NEEDS YOU TO PLAY YOUR PART AND DON'T LET neo-nazism,
terrorism and religious bigotry BECOME AN UNSTOPPABLE PLAQUE

<http://www.grapple369.com/images/uncle-sam-wants-you.png>

WHAT HAVE YOU FORGOTTEN?

YOUTUBE: “In the Navy (Village People)”

<https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=InBXu-iY7cw>

GOVERNMENT SHILL #2 (GOV....@GMAIL.COM) @ 0924 HOURS ON 6 JANUARY 2019:
"You will write a couple of hundred lines of gobbledygook, as usual."

DOLF @ 1117 HOURS ON 6 JANUARY 2019: "NO I'M ACTUALLY GIVING A VALID
EXPLANATION WHICH CONVEYS PRINCIPLES OF Existential phenomenology that
exceeds Martin Heidegger's brand of phenomenology:

Wanting to determine the reality of the notion: 'this is a test' as a
criteria of existentiality, this would then require a resolution of the
criteria of enquiry being the hierarchy pairing as: #61 / #122 against the
default neurological and personalistic disposition:

THUS I CONVEY THE EPISTEMOLOGICAL PREMISE as an INTUITION of the
ONTOLOGICAL EXPERIENCE in being DEPENDENT upon ONTIC necessity expressed
by:

#205 - *PRINCIPLE* *OF* *THE* *PERSISTENCE* *OF* *SUBSTANCE*
#164 - *PRINCIPLE* *OF* *MATERIALITY*

And its CRITERIA of either #277 - RIGHT TO PLACE A TEST / #237 - IMMUTABLE
WILL is itself an outcome of a DIALECTIC SYNCRETIC META-PHYSICAL PROCESS:

#364 - PRINCIPLE OF ENQUIRY
#312 - PRINCIPLE OF CONTRADICTION
#273 - PRINCIPLE OF SYNCRETISM

Which although outside time or preceding instantiation within TIME as an
IDEA:

[I, {@1: Sup: 9 (#9); Ego: 9 (#9)},
D, {@2: Sup: 13 (#22); Ego: 4 (#13)},
E, {@3: Sup: 18 (#40); Ego: 5 (#18)},
A] {@4: Sup: 19 (#59); Ego: 1 (#19)},

Nevertheless conforms {#9 + #22 + #40 + #59 = #130 - I AM NOT EVIL MINDED
{%3}} to the ANTHROPOCENTRIC characteristic of TIME.

H3117@{
@1: Sup: 30 (#30); Ego: 30 (#30),
@2: Sup: 40 (#70); Ego: 10 (#40),
@3: Sup: 80 (#150 - I INDULGE NOT IN ANGER {%28}); Ego: 40 (#80),
@4: Sup: 9 (#159); Ego: 10 (#90),
@5: Sup: 42 (#201); Ego: 33 (#123),
Male: #201; Feme: #123
} // #130

T'AI HSÜAN CHING {POLAR OPPOSITIONS / INTERPLAY OF OPPOSITES} [4 BCE]:

UMBRA: #130 % #41 = #7 - Intentional Reversal, Dimming Radiance; I-Ching:
H12 - Obstruction, Stagnation, Selfish persons; Tetra: 56 - Closed Mouth;

THOTH MEASURE: #7 - Oh thou whose eyes pierce like swords, who makest thine
appearance in Sechem; I commit no fraud.

#VIRTUE: With Ascent (no. #7), coming up against plainness?
#TOOLS: With Pattern (no. #47), increasing artifice.
#POSITION: With Youthfulness (no. #12), having no knowledge, but
#TIME: With Fullness (no. #38), having a surplus.
#CANON: #104

ONTIC_OBLIGANS_104@{
@1: Sup: 7 (#7); Ego: 7 (#7),
@2: Sup: 54 (#61); Ego: 47 (#54),
@3: Sup: 66 (#127); Ego: 12 (#66),
@4: Sup: 23 (#150 - I INDULGE NOT IN ANGER {%28}); Ego: 38 (#104 - I
COMMIT NO FRAUD {%7}),
Male: #150; Feme: #104
} // #104

#130 as [#30, #10, #40, #10, #600] = yowm (H3117): {UMBRA: #2 as #130 % #41
= #7} 1) day, time, year; 1a) day (as opposed to night); 1b) day (24 hour
period); 1b1) as defined by evening and morning in Genesis 1; 1b2) as a
division of time; 1b2a) a working day, a day's journey; 1c) days, lifetime
(pl.); 1d) time, period (general); 1e) year; 1f) temporal references; 1f1)
today; 1f2) yesterday; 1f3) tomorrow;

"And God called the light Day {#130 as [#30, #10, #40, #10, #600] = yowm
(H3117): day}, and the darkness he called Night. And the evening and the
morning were the first day {#130 as [#30, #10, #40, #10, #600] = yowm
(H3117): day}." [Genesis 1:5 (KJV)]

"And God called the firmament Heaven. And the evening and the morning were
the second day {#130 as [#30, #10, #40, #10, #600] = yowm (H3117): day}."
[Genesis 1:8 (KJV)]

"And the evening and the morning were the third day {#130 as [#30, #10,
#40, #10, #600] = yowm (H3117): day}." [Genesis 1:13 (KJV)]

"And God said, Let there be lights in the firmament of the heaven to divide
the day {#130 as [#30, #10, #40, #10, #600] = yowm (H3117): day} from the
night; and let them be for signs, and for seasons, and for days {#130 as
[#30, #10, #40, #10, #600] = yowm (H3117): day}, and years:" [Genesis 1:14
(KJV)]

"And God made two great lights; the greater light to rule the day {#130 as
[#30, #10, #40, #10, #600] = yowm (H3117): day}, and the lesser light to
rule the night: he made the stars also." [Genesis 1:16 (KJV)]

"And to rule over the day {#130 as [#30, #10, #40, #10, #600] = yowm
(H3117): day} and over the night, and to divide the light from the
darkness: and God saw that it was good." [Genesis 1:18 (KJV)]

"And the evening and the morning were the fourth day {#130 as [#30, #10,
#40, #10, #600] = yowm (H3117): day}." [Genesis 1:19 (KJV)]

"And the evening and the morning were the fifth day {#130 as [#30, #10,
#40, #10, #600] = yowm (H3117): day}." [Genesis 1:23 (KJV)]

In contrast with his former mentor Edmund Husserl, Heidegger (in his Being
and Time) put ontology before epistemology and thought that phenomenology
would have to be based on an observation and analysis of Dasein
("being-there"), human being, investigating the fundamental ontology of the
Lebenswelt (lifeworld, Husserl's term) underlying all so-called regional
ontologies of the special sciences. In Heidegger's philosophy, people are
thrown into the world in a given situation, but they are also a project
towards the future, possibility, freedom, wait, hope, anguish. In contrast
with the philosopher Kierkegaard, Heidegger wanted to explore the problem
of Dasein existentially (existenzial), rather than existentielly
(existenziell) because Heidegger argued Kierkegaard had already described
the latter with "penetrating fashion".
[<https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Existential_phenomenology>]

GOVERNMENT SHILL #2 (GOV....@GMAIL.COM) @ 1349 HOURS ON 6 JANUARY 2019:
"And... you wrote gobbledygook instead."

DOLF @ 1413 HOURS ON 6 JANUARY 2019: "You are such an imbecile that you
cannot even recognise technical brilliance in explaining why the biblical
narrative of Genesis (1550 BCE) similarly utilises temporal designations
before time itself existed."

GOVERNMENT SHILL #2 (GOV....@GMAIL.COM) @ 1537 HOURS ON 6 JANUARY 2019:
"I recognise that there is no evidence that the bible is, in any useful
way, true."

DOLF @ 1615 HOURS ON 6 JANUARY 2019: "There is no #492 - REASONING {ie.
RATIONAL PI - 22 HEBREW LETTERS / 7 DAYS} with you is there as your #41 -
INNATE prejudice and lack of education is just #451 - ABYSMAL

51 25 74
73 50 27
26 75 49 (NATURAL PROGRESSION {#1 / #73 SUBSTITUTION}) / #450 {#PSEUDO NINE
(*YESOD*: *PROCREATIONAL* *FOUNDATION*) *OF* *JEWISH* *TORAH* *KABBALAH*
*VASSAL* *GOVERNANCE*: #YOD (#10) + #MEM (#40) + #TAU (#400) [+ #ALEPH (#1)
= #451]}

49 9 65 - *SOLDIER*
57 41 25
17 73 33 = #123 / #369 {#PSEUDO NINE *OF* *EGYPTIAN* *ANKH* *OF* *ROMAN*
*EMPIRE* *GOVERNANCE*} AS IT'S NATURAL PROGRESSION {#1 / #73 SUBSTITUTION}

<http://www.grapple369.com/images/Circle.jpeg>

[IMAGE: The MOBIUS ‘8’ LOOP OF PYTHAGOREAN SOPHISTRY AS WISDOM SO CALLED is
not homoiotic as anthropocentric but rather “homeomorphic to a circle”]

#YOD (#10) {10 SEPTEMBER 2001 - THE HONOURABLE JOHN HOWARD (THEN AUSTRALIAN
PRIME MINISTER) IN NEW YORK}
#MEM (#40) {#41 - #CENTRE: #6000 %22 = 13 - DELIMITED: 13 SEPTEMBER 2001}
#TAU (#400) {CIRCUMSCRIBING : 22 SEPTEMBER 2001}
#ALEPH (#1) {23 CHROMOSOMES: 23 SEPTEMBER 2001} = #451

#451 - *ABYSS* / *PRE-TEMPORAL* *VOID* + #41 x n - ONTIC FACULTY = #492 -
VOLUNTARY FREE WILL {ie. 12 x #41 as CIRCULARITY of BEING} and through
inclusion of #41 x n - ONTIC FACULTY as a cognitive conceptualisation then
allows for stages of development.

THERE CAN BE NO DOUBT ABOUT THE FACT THAT THE GENESIS {ie. DAO-ziran /
COURSE-trochos OF NATURE-genesis: #1, #21, #41, #61, #81 / BIRTHDAY
CELEBRATION-genesia} BIBLICAL TEXT RELATES TO AN #451 - COSMOGONIC PREMISE
FOR NATURE AND #41 - ONTIC NECESSITY BASIS OF HOMOGENEOUS #492 - VOLUNTARY
FREE WILL, TRINOMIAL MORALITY AND JURISPRUDENCE:

#8 - Transforming Nature: {DOUBLE: #4 - Nature Amended in its Nature {#7 -
Engendering Nature}}

#11 x #41 = #451 - COSMOGONY {#KAF {#20} / #M {#40}} as TERRA-FORMING is
the conveyance of discovery as natural secrets which influences the spread
of Light and industry by Government and Non-Government Organisations as
conducive for sustainable #9 - Autonomous Nature

That what MOSES is here cognitive of is clearly a relativity between the
‘OTH CYCLE and #41 - ONTIC necessity which expresses an equivalence by:

#2184 % #41 = #11

Colin Jones a lecturer in Aboriginal History, talking about 'What do
circles represent in Aboriginal art?" his culture, his history and his art
within a similar manner.

YOUTUBE: "What do circles represent in Aboriginal art?"

<https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=qyUxxgwHK8Q>

ANTHROPOCENTRIC (adjective):
- regarding the human being as the central fact of the universe.
- assuming human beings to be the final aim and end of the universe.
- viewing and interpreting everything in terms of human experience and
values.

In modern Israeli orthography, vowel and consonant pointing is seldom used,
except in specialised texts such as dictionaries, poetry, or texts for
children or for new immigrants. *LIKE* *ENGLISH* Israeli Hebrew has five
vowel phonemes—/i/, /e/, /a/, /o/ and /u/—but many more written symbols for
them.

What are you doing for AUSTRALIA DAY?"

GOVERNMENT SHILL #2 (GOV....@GMAIL.COM) @ 1808 HOURS ON 6 JANUARY 2019:
"Babble. Just babble. Try writing in English, ya crazy bastard."

DOLF @ 1824 HOURS ON 6 JANUARY 2019: "Sorry I don't speak Goidelic
Hillbilly."

GOVERNMENT SHILL #2 (GOV....@GMAIL.COM) @ 1829 HOURS ON 6 JANUARY 2019:
"I asked you to speak English. You've heard of English, right?

You probably went to school. You seem to be fairly intelligent. Write in
English."

DOLF @ 1833 HOURS ON 6 JANUARY 2019: "What else of #873 - PROBITY and #644
- DECORUM accorded to DIGNITY ROYAL would you like to talk about?"

- dolf

Initial Post: 4 January 2019

--


YOUTUBE: "The Meerkat Circus"

<https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=H-7OuqWi4vQ>

SEE ALSO AS RELATIONSHIP: *INVALIDATING* {Perennial philosophy (HETEROS
{#390 - ROBBERS} v’s HOMOIOS {#391 - STEWARDS OF GOD’S HOUSE} THEORY OF
NUMBER) as universal of right and wrong...} *THE* *ORTHODOX* *AND* *ROMAN*
*CATHOLIC* *CHURCH'S* *CLAIM* {#390 as 1, #100, #80, #1, #3, #5, #200 as
harpax (G727): {#11 as #242} 1) rapacious, ravenous; 2) a extortioner, a
robber} *TO* *JUBILEE2000* *AS* *BEING* *DELUSIONAL* *AND* *FRAUDULENT*

Private “Saint Andrews” Street on the edge of the Central Business District
dated 16th May, 2000 - This report is prepared in response to a TP00/55 as
a Notice of an Application for Planning Permit

<http://www.grapple369.com/jubilee2000.html>

SEE ALSO: HYPOSTASIS as DAO OF NATURE (Chinese: ZIRAN) / COURSE (Greek:
TROCHOS) OF NATURE (Greek: GENESIS) [James 3:6]

Chinese HAN Dynasty (206 BCE - 220CE) Hexagon Trigrams to Tetragram
assignments proposed by Yang Hsiung (53BCE - 18CE) which by 4BCE
(translation published within English as first European language in 1993),
first appeared in draft form as a meta-thesis titled T'AI HSUAN CHING {ie.
Canon of Supreme Mystery} on Natural Divination associated with the theory
of number, annual seasonal chronology and astrology reliant upon the seven
visible planets as cosmological mother image and the zodiac.

It shows the ZIRAN as the DAO of NATURE / COURSE-trochos OF NATURE-genesis
[James 3:6] as HYPOSTATIS comprising #81 trinomial tetragrammaton x 4.5 day
= #364.5 day / year as HOMOIOS THEORY OF NUMBER which is an amalgam of the
64 hexagrams as binomial trigrams / 81 as trinomial tetragrammaton rather
than its encapsulated contrived use as the microcosm to redefine the
macrocosm as the quintessence of the Pythagorean [Babylonian] as binomial
canon of transposition as HETEROS THEORY OF NUMBER.

<http://www.grapple369.com/nature.html>

The Charter of Human Rights and Responsibilities No. 43 of Act 2006 defines
a "PERSON MEANS A HUMAN BEING” and the question is, if it is permissible to
extend this definition to be a "PERSON MEANS A HUMAN BEING AS A CONSCIOUS
REALITY OF HOMO [iOS] SAPIEN [T] WHO IS INSTANTIATED WITHIN THE TEMPORAL
REALITY AS THEN THE CAUSE FOR REASONING AND RATIONALITY."

That my mathematical theoretical noumenon defines the meta-descriptor
prototypes which are prerequisite to the BEING of HOMO [iOS] SAPIEN [T] as
EXISTENCE / *OUSIA*.

<http://www.grapple369.com/Grapple.zip> (Download resources)

After all the ENNEAD of THOTH and not the Roman Catholic Eucharist,
expresses an Anthropic Cosmological Principle which appears within its
geometric conception as being equivalent to the Pythagorean
TETRAD/TETRACTYS