Feedback to APT TC Software Development Meeting

[Markus Kühbach]

Dear colleagues,

I would like to ask for your opinion about yesterdays discussion about metadata and ontologies and its status quo in APT/FIM,

and the idea of writing a (review) paper about this which summarizes where we are, were we want to go, and maybe even

sketch + implement an idea how such community-specific ontology could look like.
Before sending an invitation to this to all participants of the meeting, I thought it is fair to discuss this first before

getting started. I am not expecting an ontology to be complete with a single paper contribution but it
would be a start to document that we have done our homework and can then enter the discussion with

ontology specialists.

Bests,

Markus

----------------------------------------------------------------
Dr.-Ing. Markus Kühbach

Max-Planck-Institut für Eisenforschung GmbH

Department "Microstructure Physics and Alloy Design"
Research group "Theory and Simulation"
Room 649
+49 211 6792 385
m.kue...@mpie.de

---

-------------------------------------------------
Max-Planck-Institut für Eisenforschung GmbH
Max-Planck-Straße 1
D-40237 Düsseldorf
 
Handelsregister B 2533 
Amtsgericht Düsseldorf
 
Geschäftsführung
Prof. Dr. Gerhard Dehm
Prof. Dr. Jörg Neugebauer
Prof. Dr. Dierk Raabe
Dr. Kai de Weldige
 
Ust.-Id.-Nr.: DE 11 93 58 514 
Steuernummer: 105 5891 1000


Please consider that invitations and e-mails of our institute are 
only valid if they end with …@mpie.de. 
If you are not sure of the validity please contact r...@mpie.de

Bitte beachten Sie, dass Einladungen zu Veranstaltungen und E-Mails
aus unserem Haus nur mit der Endung …@mpie.de gültig sind. 
In Zweifelsfällen wenden Sie sich bitte an r...@mpie.de
-------------------------------------------------

[London, Andy]

Hi Markus,

While a paper has positive points in terms of being easily recognisable academically, I think it should avoid any speculation. I wouldn't want to stifle the discussion by presenting something that makes it seem like we have already made out mind up. For the development and discussion a more interactive medium would be better suited.

I do like the idea of having a summary to date, and to review solutions from other similar communities. This would be a firm foundation on which to the build the recommendation of an ontology.

Would it be a good place for Oxford to present their work on hashing? That would give the hashing work more visibility, but they may want it as it's own separate publication.

Andy

---

From: atompr...@googlegroups.com <atompr...@googlegroups.com> on behalf of Markus Kühbach <m.kue...@mpie.de>
Sent: Friday, July 31, 2020 9:20:48 AM
To: atompr...@googlegroups.com <atompr...@googlegroups.com>
Subject: Feedback to APT TC Software Development Meeting

 

--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "AtomProbe TC" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to atomprobe-tc...@googlegroups.com.
To view this discussion on the web, visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/atomprobe-tc/2114477719-2064%40xmail1.mpie.de.