#Text ?

0 views

Skip to first unread message

unread,

Jul 26, 2006, 1:53:55 PM7/26/06

to atom-owl

In many places in the current AtomOwl, I see #Text as the range of
textual properties..for example

<owl:FunctionalProperty
rdf:about="http://bblfish.net/work/atom-owl/2006-06-06/#subtitle">
<rdf:type
rdf:resource="http://www.w3.org/2002/07/owl#ObjectProperty"/>
<comment xml:lang="en">see Â§4.2.12 of rfc 4287. Subtitle of
the feed.</comment>
<domain
rdf:resource="http://bblfish.net/work/atom-owl/2006-06-06/#Feed"/>
<label xml:lang="en">subtitle</label>
<range
rdf:resource="http://bblfish.net/work/atom-owl/2006-06-06/#Text"/>
<subPropertyOf
rdf:resource="http://bblfish.net/work/atom-owl/2006-06-06/#content"/>
</owl:FunctionalProperty>

However, there is tno #Text class defined. Should the ranges in this
case be "TextContent" ?

- Ben

unread,

Jul 26, 2006, 2:08:14 PM7/26/06

to atom...@googlegroups.com

Very well spotted Ben.

I was not sure what to call that class, and I must have forgotten
to change the code with a later change of mine.

This has been fixed and I will push out the changes with my next
subversion commit.

Thanks a lot,

Henry

On 26 Jul 2006, at 19:53, BenSzekely wrote:
> In many places in the current AtomOwl, I see #Text as the range of
> textual properties..for example
>
> <owl:FunctionalProperty
> rdf:about="http://bblfish.net/work/atom-owl/2006-06-06/#subtitle">
> <rdf:type
> rdf:resource="http://www.w3.org/2002/07/owl#ObjectProperty"/>