Fwd: UPDATE: Wyndgate-Gate: No Atheists Allowed: Dawkins Event Banned in Michigan

1 view
Skip to first unread message

Rich Hammett

unread,
Oct 14, 2011, 10:47:02 AM10/14/11
to atlanta-...@googlegroups.com
There's some confusion right now about the American Cancer Society supporting explicitly atheist teams for charity runs and fund collection(?!).  Here's a much clearer case that CFI is pursuing against a country club that cancelled a Richard Dawkins event.  Their case is that "religion" is a protected class under US civil rights laws, and that "atheist" is protected as a member of that class against discrimination based purely on religious (lack of) belief.
 
I'm interested to see how this fares in court.  It's definitely not going to win public opinion, but it could provide a good legal precedent.  While getting the country club a lot more business.  :)
 
rich
---------- Forwarded message ----------
From: Center for Inquiry <in...@centerforinquiry.net>
Date: 2011/10/14
Subject: UPDATE: Wyndgate-Gate: No Atheists Allowed: Dawkins Event Banned in Michigan
To: rham...@hiwaay.net


UPDATE: CFI to pursue legal remedies against Wyndgate Country Club

BREAKING: O'Reilly to respond to "Wyndgate-Gate"
on Friday, October 14, O'Reilly Factor

Richard DawkinsAs reported on Monday, October 10, a CFI–Michigan event featuring Richard Dawkins was abruptly cancelled after the owner of the venue saw an interview with Dawkins on The O'Reilly Factor in which Dawkins discussed his new book, The Magic of Reality: How We Know What's Really True. (Full message copied below.)

Since that message was released, dozens of news outlets have reported the story and CFI has received numerous letters of support and shared outrage.  (Thank you!)  We have also received many inquiries essentially asking, "What are you going to do about this?" Our reply: CFI will be pursuing legal action against The Wyndgate Country Club.

CFI is experienced in legal advocacy and is well-equipped to challenge this act of discrimination by The Wyndgate.  As more and more people publicly identify as atheists (as Richard Dawkins has bravely done), we anticipate even more discriminatory acts to arise, so it is important for everyone to understand how civil rights laws may apply to nonbelievers. 

NOTE: We say “laws” because there are not only various federal laws but also state laws, some of which are broader in scope than federal law.  In the present situation, the relevant statutes are the federal Civil Rights Act of 1964 and Michigan’s Elliott-Larsen Civil Rights Act. Generally—and specifically in this instance—the following rules apply:

•  Privately-owned companies are not exempt from laws against discrimination.  If a privately-owned Michigan business offers services to the public (the legal term is "public accommodation,") they must abide by both the Civil Rights Act of 1964 and the Elliott-Larsen Civil Rights Act and cannot discriminate against people based on religion.
 
•  Prohibitions of discrimination based on religion protect atheists.  Some people think that because atheism is not a religion, atheists do not belong in the "religion class" protected by civil rights laws.  Legal precedent demonstrates, however, that rights based on "freedom of religion" are also granted to those who are not religious.

•  The protections of the civil rights laws only apply to specific "classes" of people.  For example, Title II of the Civil Rights Act of 1964 (which prohibits discrimination in public accommodations) prohibits discrimination against people based on their race, color, religion, or national origin.  It does not protect people based on, for example, their political opinions, economic ideologies, or their taste in art.  In other words, the owner of a private company could refuse to host a Nazi-sympathizer or a Tea Bagger, an Al Gore, a Robert Reich, or a Christo.

•  Whether a discriminatory act occurred is a question that is determined through the legal process.  Rare is the company that admits to discrimination.  Companies often will offer explanations, arguing they based their decision on something other than a person’s protected group status.  For example, they may claim a person was turned away not because of religious beliefs, but because the company was concerned about “disruption.”  The relevant court or agency will determine whether the company’s explanation is a pretext for discrimination.

What is indisputable is that discrimination based on religion is both intolerable and illegal.  In other words, as CFI–Michigan executive director, Jeff Seaver, has pointed out, "discrimination based on a person’s religion—or lack thereof—is legally equivalent to discriminating against a person because of his or her race."

“This action by The Wyndgate illustrates the kind of bias and bigotry that nonbelievers encounter all the time.  It’s exactly why organizations like CFI and the Richard Dawkins Foundation are needed: to help end the stigma attached to being a nonbeliever.”

Stay tuned for further developments,
and tune in to watch The O'Reilly Factor Friday night.

 


Original message from October 10, 2011:


Richard Dawkins Event Banned by
Michigan Country Club

The Wyndgate Country Club in Rochester Hills, MI, cancels Center for Inquiry–Michigan event with biologist Richard Dawkins because of his atheist philosophy.


Prejudice against atheists manifested itself again when The Wyndgate Country Club in Rochester Hills, Michigan (outside of Detroit), cancelled an event with scientist and author Richard Dawkins after learning of Dawkins’s views on religion. The event had been arranged by the Center for Inquiry–Michigan (CFI), an advocacy group for secularism and science, and the Richard Dawkins Foundation for Reason and Science.

The Wyndgate terminated the agreement after the owner saw an October 5th interview with Dawkins on The O’Reilly Factor in which Dawkins discussed his new book, The Magic of Reality: How We Know What’s Really True.

In a phone call to CFI–Michigan Assistant Director Jennifer Beahan, The Wyndgate’s representative explained that the owner did not wish to associate with individuals such as Dawkins, or his philosophies.

Although privately owned, The Wyndgate facilities are open to the public for special events and occasions. According to Title II of the Federal Civil Rights Law of 1964, “open to the public” means “all persons shall be entitled to the full and equal enjoyment of the goods, services, facilities, privileges, advantages, and accommodations of any place of public accommodation, as defined in this section, without discrimination or segregation on the ground of race, color, religion, or national origin.”

After learning of the owner’s last-minute refusal to allow Dawkins to speak, CFI–Michigan asked the owner to reconsider his position, but this attempt to resolve the issue amicably was met with silence. The sold-out event, scheduled for Wednesday, October 12, will now be held at a different venue.

“It’s important to understand that discrimination based on a person’s religion—or lack thereof—is legally equivalent to discriminating against a person because of his or her race,” said Jeff Seaver, executive director of CFI–Michigan. “This action by The Wyndgate illustrates the kind of bias and bigotry that nonbelievers encounter all the time. It’s exactly why organizations like CFI and the Richard Dawkins Foundation are needed: to help end the stigma attached to being a nonbeliever.”

I Support Reason, Science, and Freedom of Inquiry
For more information, contact Jeff Seaver,
Executive Director, CFI-Michigan:
616-262-0345 or jse...@centerforinquiry.net

As part of our mission to foster a society based on science, reason, and secular values, CFI is working to "end the stigma attached to being a nonbeliever."  Please become a member and add your support to this important cause!


Please Donate

©2011 Center for Inquiry · 3965 Rensch Rd. · Amherst, NY 14228

(716) 636-4869 · in...@centerforinquiry.net

Unsubscribe from receiving email, or change your email preferences.




--
\  Rich Hammett       http://home.hiwaay.net/~rhammett
/        rich.h...@gmail.com
\ Just one spark of decency Against a starless night,
/ One glow of hope and dignity; A child can follow the light
Reply all
Reply to author
Forward
0 new messages