The London attack
kstahl
that I noticed very strongly is that the Londoners who were
interviewed were invariably saying that they cannot allow
terrorists to determine how they live their lives because
then the terrorists have won.
Of course that does not go down very well with Bush
Republicans. Their whole premise is that they purposely want
americans to change their lives after 9/11 and, by the way,
they should shift to conservatism because that is the proper
ideology for those who hate america and want to change our
lives to suit Republican priorities.
So, unlike England, the terrorists have won here. They
forced us to change our lifestyles. They've provide a
springboard for such monstrosities as TSA, DHS and all of
the new intelligence agencies that have been created to
waste more taxpayer money. The terrorists have won by
forcing us to accept gasoline over $2 a gallon. They have
won by removing American access to what used to be popular
tourist destinations. The tourists have won by allowing
Republicans to go to war so that Halliburton can profit. The
terrorists have won at almost every turn. Isn't it time
that Americans start winning for a change instead of the
terrorists?
--
Blogging at http://HexagonalPeg.blogspot.com
Joseph E. Johnston
news:jtudndGfBbO...@comcast.com...
> Of course that does not go down very well with Bush Republicans. Their
> whole premise is that they purposely want americans to change their lives
> after 9/11 and, by the way, they should shift to conservatism because that
> is the proper ideology for those who hate america and want to change our
> lives to suit Republican priorities.
>
> So, unlike England, the terrorists have won here. They forced us to change
> our lifestyles. They've provide a springboard for such monstrosities as
> TSA, DHS and all of the new intelligence agencies that have been created
> to waste more taxpayer money. The terrorists have won by forcing us to
> accept gasoline over $2 a gallon. They have won by removing American
> access to what used to be popular tourist destinations. The tourists have
> won by allowing Republicans to go to war so that Halliburton can profit.
> The terrorists have won at almost every turn. Isn't it time that Americans
> start winning for a change instead of the terrorists?
Truly you are a simple minded fool incapable of critical thought. My nine
year old analyzes data and draws conclusions more effectively than you do.
Do yourself a big favor-- log off permanently and quit embarrassing yourself
in public.
Joe
kstahl
All you are doing is stating that you support the
terrorists. You want them to change our lifestyle because it
is only through that means that conservatives can maintain
their tight control over our national ideology. Why don't
you save yourself embarrassment and go hide in a corner
where the terrorists can't get to you and leave the running
of America to Americans?
Albert
> of critical thought. My nine year old analyzes
> data and draws conclusions more effectively than you do.
And you are being nice to stahl.
He's as vile a liberal as they come.
> Do yourself a big favor-- log off permanently
> and quit embarrassing yourself in public.
Liberals wear their stupidity as a badge of honor.
Barry
Eric Greene
>Anybody out there on board with kstahl?
If we are talking about how the terrorists have "won," then yes, I
believe he is correct.
I had an total knee replacement done 2 years ago and this causes nothing
but hassles when attempting to board an aircraft. Have to get out of
line and go through the whole wanding experience. Last trip I was
sitting in the seat waiting for the "security" guard to finish the old
gentleman ahead of me. He was well into his 80's, nicely dressed and in
a wheelchair. He was being hassled because he couldn't reach down and
undo his shoes. He looked at me and said "This is NOT why I was part of
the D-Day invasion."
We have given up freedoms for some false sense of security.
We have become a nation of wimps lead by a wimp.
Barry
> have "won," then yes, I believe he is correct.
To quote Joseph E. Johnson:
"Truly you are a simple minded fool incapable of critical thought."
_________________________________
Care to try again?
kstahl said
All you are doing is stating that you support the
terrorists. You want them to change our lifestyle because it
is only through that means that conservatives can maintain
their tight control over our national ideology. Why don't
you save yourself embarrassment and go hide in a corner
where the terrorists can't get to you and leave the running
of America to Americans?
________________________________________
Atlanta Ranger
"Barry" <barry...@shinyfeet.com> wrote in message
news:1120785087.1...@g44g2000cwa.googlegroups.com...
> Anybody out there on board with kstahl?
If I were, I'd push him off. It would raise the average IQ of this group by
about 20 points.
TheNIGHTCRAWLER
You're a fanatic, right? I am. I've come across some really fanatic
people in my time. Every last one of them out to improve the way they
live, those fanatics, without fail.
Every last one. Willing to die to correct the perceived direction of
society. Willing to kill. Willing to kill and die. On faith.
The U.S. first and foremost at this time.
10 yrs from now, it will be someone else in the God years. Ever there
is a period when the god years take hold. Dividing govn't into separate
entities was to prevent a single "God" from ruling the people.
Ingenious actually. Will that withstand the test of time?
The Constitution of the United States of America was designed to thwart
exactly this. I'll just be the judge.
ThePEOPLE
(Because, I'm interested.)
TheNIGHTCRAWLER
You just have no idea of what people do. The mechanics of it all.
Everyone in this group has around 20 IQ points in their back pocket,
should they choose to spend them.
And that's just the above and beyond points.
Still haven't made it over a single line? S'OKay.
NC
da_b...@hotmail.com
> I just got done watching the evening news.
You have my sympathies. Let me guess--the newscasters could barely
contain their woodies over this latest Terra tack, right?
> One of the things
> that I noticed very strongly is that the Londoners who were
> interviewed were invariably saying that they cannot allow
> terrorists to determine how they live their lives because
> then the terrorists have won.
This is not exactly new to Londoners. They've been attacked before,
they'll be attacked again. Hitler's war machine couldn't destroy them,
nor could the IRA: This gang of religious nutjobs won't either.
> Of course that does not go down very well with Bush
> Republicans. Their whole premise is that they purposely want
> americans to change their lives after 9/11 and, by the way,
> they should shift to conservatism because that is the proper
> ideology for those who hate america and want to change our
> lives to suit Republican priorities.
Actually, you're 180 degrees off here. Team Bush didn't really want us
proles to change much of anything after 9/11. Have you forgotten the
George's cruise ship commercials? "Go about yer bizness..."
> So, unlike England, the terrorists have won here. They
> forced us to change our lifestyles. They've provide a
> springboard for such monstrosities as TSA, DHS and all of
> the new intelligence agencies that have been created to
> waste more taxpayer money.
eh, just rearranging the deck chairs. The real post 9/11 monstrosity
was the misuse of the military, but I won't go there now.
> The terrorists have won by
> forcing us to accept gasoline over $2 a gallon.
That was going to happen anyway. (both the pricing and the acceptance.)
> They have
> won by removing American access to what used to be popular
> tourist destinations. The tourists have won by allowing
> Republicans to go to war so that Halliburton can profit.
Well, yeah, I'll give you that, although it's probably fair to say that
some Republicans supported the war for nobler reasons than access to
Iraq's oil reserves. (Some.)
> The
> terrorists have won at almost every turn. Isn't it time
> that Americans start winning for a change instead of the
> terrorists?
Hey, we got the shoe bomber! and I think we've killed the AQ #3 guy
four or five times...
> Blogging at http://HexagonalPeg.blogspot.com
Meant to tell you, your Yacub/Nada entry was priceless.
FACE
>> The
>> terrorists have won at almost every turn. Isn't it time
>> that Americans start winning for a change instead of the
>> terrorists?
>
>Hey, we got the shoe bomber! and I think we've killed the AQ #3 guy
>four or five times...
Have you ever considered that if you get the #3 guy the current #4 guy
becomes the new #3 guy.....ad infinitum.
da_b...@hotmail.com
> On 8 Jul 2005 05:40:35 -0700, in atl.general da_b...@hotmail.com wrote:
> >[...] I think we've killed the AQ #3 guy
> >four or five times.
>
>
> Have you ever considered that if you get the #3 guy the current #4 guy
> becomes the new #3 guy.....
Ever watch the TV Series, "The Prisoner?" There was always a new #2.
> ad infinitum.
Literally? I sure hope not.
FACE
>Ever watch the TV Series, "The Prisoner?" There was always a new #2.
>
No. But it sounds like #2 musta ticked off #1 a lot.
>> ad infinitum.
>
>Literally? I sure hope not.
:-)
Holger Dansk
kstahl wrote:
> I just got done watching the evening news. One of the things
> that I noticed very strongly is that the Londoners who were
> interviewed were invariably saying that they cannot allow
> terrorists to determine how they live their lives because
> then the terrorists have won.
>
> Of course that does not go down very well with Bush
> Republicans. Their whole premise is that they purposely want
> Americans to change their lives after 9/11 and, by the way,
> they should shift to conservatism because that is the proper
> ideology for those who hate America and want to change our
> lives to suit Republican priorities.
>
> So, unlike England, the terrorists have won here. They
> forced us to change our lifestyles. They've provide a
> springboard for such monstrosities as TSA, DHS and all of
> the new intelligence agencies that have been created to
> waste more taxpayer money. The terrorists have won by
> forcing us to accept gasoline over $2 a gallon. They have
> won by removing American access to what used to be popular
> tourist destinations. The tourists have won by allowing
> Republicans to go to war so that Halliburton can profit.
Since when do tourists control Republicans? Most tourists are
republicans. Democrats mostly stay at home under the bed. Halliburton
has made money over many years before Afghanistan and Iraq.
> The terrorists have won at almost every turn. Isn't it time
> that Americans start winning for a change instead of the
> terrorists?
The terrorists haven't won anything and they will not win anything.
They have no sense of values and don't know where they are going. "For
a ship that doesn't know where it's going, there is no favorable wind."
- Seneca
We always win. That's why they hate us so much.
Holger
abc
Updated survey of male Subaru owners now shows that
10 out of 10 male Subaru owners suffer from Erectile Dysfunction.
abc
"Barry" <barry...@shinyfeet.com> wrote in message
news:1120785087.1...@g44g2000cwa.googlegroups.com...
>
Way back I used to think Stahl really believed what he
wrote. Later, I began to think he was a very clever troll.
Finally, I have come to believe Stahl is nothing more than
a very boring and frustrated man, whose life has become
unmanageable. I seldom read his repetitious and boring
posts. I have not kill filed him, because sometimes I need
a good laugh, and I get it sometimes from the drivel he posts.
Basically, Stahl has no life, and in his case, the worn out
Usenet admonition of Get A Life really *does* apply to him.
Stahl looks forward to reading the reactions he gets from
his inane posts, because he has nothing else to do but sit
in front of his computer monitor. Stahl does not like Stahl,
hence why he spends so much time on Usenet, being a
hermit.
abc in Buckhead
Holger Dansk
doesn't know what to do with it.
The terrorist are subhuman and sub-animal. Any goals they have are
demented and irrational. IE, those virgins that they are supposed to
encounter after they insanely take their own lives.
Holger
kstahl
> a very boring and frustrated man, whose life has become
> unmanageable.
I do manage to insert all
kinds of things in my rectum.
kstahl
Fine. Believe what you will. It isn't as if your opinion has
any effect on anything. I go about my life my own way and
you probably go about yours in a way that pleases you. Soon
enough I'll be dead and then the rest of you can find bliss
and tranquility.
kstahl
Yes. It stays hard most of the time. Can't keep a good thing
down.
DarkAngel
for I am the guide. There is no avoiding my embrace.
DarkAngel
kstahl
Real white of you, kornholer.
> It isn't as if your opinion has any effect on anything.
Something you're familiar with, kornholer.
> Soon enough I'll be dead and then
How soon?
Don't put off till tomorrow
what you can do today.
> the rest of you can find bliss and tranquility.
KennyKornholer's delusions of mattering.
kstahl
in two inch packages. Ask his ex-wife.
TheNIGHTCRAWLER
It's a bender. Yes?
Someone's counting bodies, and it's not me this time.
http://www.cnn.com/SPECIALS/2003/iraq/forces/casualties/2003.12.html
TheNIGHTCRAWLER
(If ya don't want a free society. Ya don't demand one in the
constitution. You know, that thing we are capable of insisting that
iraq do lately. Reference above link for ideological purposes.)
Eric Greene
Seems we have a set of differing religious views here. Given a choice,
the Muslim heaven, with all those virgins, sounds a lot more enticing
that the Christian heaven where souls sit on clouds and strum harps.
Read Mark Twain's "Letters from the Earth" for a more complete study of
this. http://www.positiveatheism.org/hist/twainlfe.htm
How about a guessing game: What religion do you think you would be had
you been born in, oh, Qatar or Saudi Arabia? For most people, religious
faith is a happenstance of birth.
Peter Alerich
>So, unlike England, the terrorists have won here.
>They forced us to change our lifestyles.
Not mine. I can't honestly think of a single thing I'm doing any
differently now in my day to day life than before 9/11.
>The terrorists have won by forcing us to accept gasoline over $2 a gallon.
When did we get the birthright to cheap gasoline? Compared to much of
the rest of the world gasoline has always been pretty cheap here, and
still is compared to some.
Ken, you fly alot. You've had to have noticed that most airports have
international gates - i.e. flights that leave bound for another
country. If you are so dissatisfied with the way the government here
has forced *you* (not the rest of us) to change your way of life, why
not go live somewhere else? I hate to play the "America, Love it or
Leave it" card but all you do is piss and moan and bitch. All the
time. You're just about the most unhappy soul I've seen online next to
Lloyd Parker.
Peter
kstahl
> On Thu, 07 Jul 2005 19:47:44 -0400, kstahl <kts...@yahoo.com> wrote:
>
>
>>So, unlike England, the terrorists have won here.
>>They forced us to change our lifestyles.
>
>
> Not mine. I can't honestly think of a single thing I'm doing any
> differently now in my day to day life than before 9/11.
>
>
>>The terrorists have won by forcing us to accept gasoline over $2 a gallon.
>
>
> When did we get the birthright to cheap gasoline? Compared to much of
> the rest of the world gasoline has always been pretty cheap here, and
> still is compared to some.
They how was it that during the Clinton administration there
was a period when gas was under $1 a gallon? Of course
Clinton didn't have friends in the oil business. Now, with
both a President and VP who have extensive interests in the
oil business the prices have risen dramatically. When there
is a smell of rotten fish, you can bet there is a rotten
fish lying around somewhere.
>
> Ken, you fly alot. You've had to have noticed that most airports have
> international gates - i.e. flights that leave bound for another
> country. If you are so dissatisfied with the way the government here
> has forced *you* (not the rest of us) to change your way of life, why
> not go live somewhere else? I hate to play the "America, Love it or
> Leave it" card but all you do is piss and moan and bitch. All the
> time. You're just about the most unhappy soul I've seen online next to
> Lloyd Parker.
>
> Peter
>
Actually, if you flew a lot you would know that most
airports do not have international gates. There are more
airports that only do domestic business then there are those
that do international business. In general only major
airports have international service. Try taking an
international flight out of Williamsport, Pennsylvania or
out of Peachtree-Dekalb. Before you waste you time, you
can't because they don't have international flights. Your
idea of "most" simply does not hold water.
I'll be much happier once government that represents the
interests of the people rather then the interests of
business has been restored to this country. It will happen.
You can't pretend that it will not. And it will happen
whether you acknowledge it or not. As soon as that happens,
watch the price of gas go down and observe as we stop using
Iraq as a testing ground for new weapons. But also watch as
the stock market actually expands again. Investors simply
don't want to take risks when there is so much instability
that is generated by the present administration.
Andy Walton
wrote:
> Way back I used to think Stahl really believed what he
> wrote. Later, I began to think he was a very clever troll.
You need to understand that there are two people posting under the
handle kstahl at the moment. One is Ken Stahl. The other is a malignant
little moron who changes handles every few months to dodge the
killfiling he so richly deserves.
You could check the headers, but there's no need, really. If the post
consists of nothing but homosexual rape fantasies, it's the impostor,
yakub/nada/whatever. He is endlessly fascinated with other men's asses,
and can't stop himself from posting about it.
If he'd just accept who he is, he could hit the Midtown bars and find
some guy who'd bang him like a screen door in a hurricane. He'd be
happier, as would we all. But, no, he'd rather spill his pathetic
self-loathing on the rest of us. He's best ignored.
--
Make definite assertions. Avoid tame, colorless, hesitating,
non-committal language. -- William Strunk Jr., "Elements of Style"
--------------------------------------------------
Andy Walton * http://atticus.home.mindspring.com/
kstahl
> In article <damq42$dje$0...@pita.alt.net>, abc <a...@stahlboyisanidiot.org>
> wrote:
>
>
>>Way back I used to think Stahl really believed what he
>>wrote. Later, I began to think he was a very clever troll.
>
>
> You need to understand that there are two people posting under the
> handle kstahl at the moment. One is Ken Stahl. The other is a malignant
> little moron who changes handles every few months to dodge the
> killfiling he so richly deserves.
>
> You could check the headers, but there's no need, really. If the post
> consists of nothing but homosexual rape fantasies, it's the impostor,
> yakub/nada/whatever. He is endlessly fascinated with other men's asses,
> and can't stop himself from posting about it.
>
> If he'd just accept who he is, he could hit the Midtown bars and find
> some guy who'd bang him like a screen door in a hurricane. He'd be
> happier, as would we all. But, no, he'd rather spill his pathetic
> self-loathing on the rest of us. He's best ignored.
>
I've never quite heard that metaphor about a screen door before.
Then again, Andy, some people just hate me because I'm a
liberal and don't try to hide it. I've become accustomed to
that.
kstahl
>> wrote. Later, I began to think he was a very clever troll.
> You need to understand
No, son of blubberman, you do.
> that there are
> two people posting under the handle
> kstahl at the moment. One is Ken Stahl.
Elephantman Walton attempts relevancy.
Only a brain dead liberal would disagree
with abc's assesment od KennyKornholer.
>>Way back I used to think Stahl really believed what he
>>wrote. Later, I began to think he was a very clever troll.
>>Finally, I have come to believe Stahl is nothing more than
>>a very boring and frustrated man, whose life has become
>>unmanageable. I seldom read his repetitious and boring
>>posts. I have not kill filed him, because sometimes I need
>>a good laugh, and I get it sometimes from the drivel he posts.
>>Basically, Stahl has no life, and in his case, the worn out
>>Usenet admonition of Get A Life really *does* apply to him.
>>Stahl looks forward to reading the reactions he gets from
>>his inane posts, because he has nothing else to do but sit
>>in front of his computer monitor. Stahl does not like Stahl,
>>hence why he spends so much time on Usenet, being a
>>hermit
Walton, son of blubberman, is a liberal
kornholer. He's just not stupid enough to
admit it. He is stupid enough to think
he's fooling somebody.
Holger Dansk
kstahl wrote:
> Peter Alerich wrote:
> > On Thu, 07 Jul 2005 19:47:44 -0400, kstahl <kts...@yahoo.com> wrote:
> >
> >
> >>So, unlike England, the terrorists have won here.
> >>They forced us to change our lifestyles.
> >
> >
> > Not mine. I can't honestly think of a single thing I'm doing any
> > differently now in my day to day life than before 9/11.
> >
> >
> >>The terrorists have won by forcing us to accept gasoline over $2 a gallon.
> >
> >
> > When did we get the birthright to cheap gasoline? Compared to much of
> > the rest of the world gasoline has always been pretty cheap here, and
> > still is compared to some.
>
> They how was it that during the Clinton administration there
> was a period when gas was under $1 a gallon? Of course
> Clinton didn't have friends in the oil business. Now, with
> both a President and VP who have extensive interests in the
> oil business the prices have risen dramatically. When there
> is a smell of rotten fish, you can bet there is a rotten
> fish lying around somewhere.
Presidents and/or administrations in the United States do not control
the price of oil.
>
> >
> > Ken, you fly a lot. You've had to have noticed that most airports have
The stock market and the economy are in very, very, very good shape.
Holger
Andy Walton
<kts...@yahoo.com> wrote:
> Andy Walton wrote:
> > If he'd just accept who he is, he could hit the Midtown bars and find
> > some guy who'd bang him like a screen door in a hurricane. He'd be
> > happier, as would we all. But, no, he'd rather spill his pathetic
> > self-loathing on the rest of us. He's best ignored.
> >
>
> I've never quite heard that metaphor about a screen door before.
I picked it up from either John Leguizamo or the "Buddy" monologues on
The Kids In The Hall. I don't remember which.
> Then again, Andy, some people just hate me because I'm a
> liberal and don't try to hide it. I've become accustomed to
> that.
Nada doesn't hate you because you're a liberal. He hates you because he
needs people to hate. It's the only reason he has to get up in the
morning. As long as he can spew homophobic rants at people who aren't
gay, he's distracted from how much he hates himself. As long as he
posts "pound my ass bloody" under your name, he can keep his own dark
fantasies at arm's length.
There are few things sadder than a self-loathing closet case. If Nada
could just learn to love himself, he might be a worthwhile human being.
As it stands, he's a twisted little creature who doesn't rate highly
enough to deserve anger or hatred. He doesn't even deserve pity, but
since I'm a warm-hearted guy, I pity him anyway.
--
"Five tacos, one taco burger. Do you know where the American Dream is?"
-- Hunter S. Thompson, Fear and Loathing in Las Vegas
whit
> liberal and don't try to hide it. I've become
> accustomed to that.
KennyKornholer thinks he's hated
"because I'm a liberal and don't try to hide it".
Whatever lets the kornholer get to sleep.
whit
> I picked it up from either John Leguizamo
>or the "Buddy" monologues on
>The Kids In The Hall. I don't remember which.
Of course you did, son of blubber.
The next original thought from you
will be your first.
> Nada doesn't hate you because you're a liberal.
Get a grip, spawn of fat fuck.
You and your liberal kornholers
are the ones always bring up HATE.
Look in the mirror, Lad of the Lard.
You and Stall are despicable, detestable,
and disgusting. I don't hate you. Why?
You're little people trying to make friends
on usenet because you have none in real life.
Why? Because you're nauseating, obnoxious,
and odious. What I find offensive, repellent,
and reprehensible is YOUR hatred for
anything republican and your defense for
anything demonkrap. I do find the demonkraps
repugnant, repulsive, and revolting. Just like
Stall and you (child of cellulite corpulence)
I don't hate you.
> If Nada could just learn to love himself,
> he might be a worthwhile human being.
Typical kaka from a looney liberal.
It doesn't work that way, sprout of jellybelly.
Stall loves himself and he's ten minutes form
putting a bullet in his brain. How about you
Walton?
Brett
> I just got done watching the evening news. One of the things
> that I noticed very strongly is that the Londoners who were
> interviewed were invariably saying that they cannot allow
> terrorists to determine how they live their lives because
> then the terrorists have won.
>
> Of course that does not go down very well with Bush
> Republicans. Their whole premise is that they purposely want
> americans to change their lives after 9/11 and, by the way,
> they should shift to conservatism because that is the proper
> ideology for those who hate america and want to change our
> lives to suit Republican priorities.
>
> forced us to change our lifestyles.
You clueless moron, laws restricting citizens rights due to terrorism had
been enforced in Britain for many years - the IRA use to enjoy bombing major
cities in the UK during the 1970's, 1980's, 1990's.....
> They've provide a
> springboard for such monstrosities as TSA, DHS and all of
> the new intelligence agencies that have been created to
> waste more taxpayer money.
One of the comments I heard today mentioned that the average person in
London would have his picture taken by the authorities a minimum of 300
times per day.
> The terrorists have won by
> forcing us to accept gasoline over $2 a gallon.
So supply and demand becomes terrorism in the pathetic lump of mush that
exists between your ears Stahl.
> They have
> won by removing American access to what used to be popular
> tourist destinations.
What popular destination do you miss because of terrorism?
> The tourists have won by allowing
> Republicans to go to war so that Halliburton can profit.
I guess that's why Halliburton has had a net loss in 2002, 2003 and 2004
(source Halliburton's 2004 annual report).
> The
> terrorists have won at almost every turn. Isn't it time
> that Americans start winning for a change instead of the
> terrorists?
Well, you might not like Bush's plan for winning the war - a world filled
with democratic free societies - but until the worthless Democrat opposition
actually formulates their plan it is still the only one out there with any
chance of success.
Tim
"Brett" <b...@192.168.10.202> wrote in message
news:XbiAe.46907$qm.3...@bignews5.bellsouth.net...
The Democrats are the party of obstruction and "no." They are
devoid of ideas and exist solely to oppose Bush on anything
and everything. The Democrats have put forth no ideas by
which to define themselves as a party.
Andy Walton
whit <whitb...@lycos.com> wrote:
> What I find offensive, repellent,
> and reprehensible is YOUR hatred for
> anything republican and your defense for
> anything demonkrap.
In other words, you're offended by the products of your imagination. I
hope you can get past that one day. Not my onus in any case.
--
"There's so much comedy on television.
Does that cause comedy in the streets?" -- Dick Cavett
kstahl
> The Democrats are the party of obstruction and "no." They are
> devoid of ideas and exist solely to oppose Bush on anything
> and everything. The Democrats have put forth no ideas by
> which to define themselves as a party.
>
That is a phony, made-up argument. There is no substance
behind it and you have no proof underlying your accusation.
Just so much banal sophistry.
On the other hand we can see EXACTLY all of the damage done
by the Republicans since the beginning of 2001. Starting
with a president who has says this type of thing in public:
"Our enemies are innovative and resourceful, and so are we.
They never stop thinking about new ways to harm our country
and our people, and neither do we."— President G. W. Bush,
Washington, D.C., Aug. 5, 2004
Tim
YAWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWN!
more psycho-babble from Stahl
zzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzz
kstahl
No. You simply made it up and now you have no defense for
your lie.
The tide will turn against Republicans/Conservatives some
day. We may have a very difficult time forgiving them.
whit
Son of Blubber blubbering.
> you're offended by the
> products of your imagination.
Doing his best Dan Rather.
What's the frequency, Walton?
"Now respectfully, when you start talking
about a liberal agenda and all the, quote,
'liberal bias' in the media, I quite frankly,
and I say this respectfully but candidly to you,
I don't know what you're talking about."
--Dan Rather to talk radio host Mike Rosen
of KOA Denver, November 28, 1995.
> I hope you can get past that one day.
Son of blubber disingenuous as ever.
> Not my anus in any case.
Open to all bidders.
Tim
Thats why we hope the lunatics from the far looney left keep
yelping, as that will guarantee many more Republican election
victories. Howard Dean, Boxer, Schumer, Roger Moore,
Ted Kennedy, Kerry, et al are some of the best friends
Republicans have.
kstahl
> Thats why we hope the lunatics from the far looney left keep
> yelping, as that will guarantee many more Republican election
> victories. Howard Dean, Boxer, Schumer, Roger Moore,
> Ted Kennedy, Kerry, et al are some of the best friends
> Republicans have.
>
Then again, all of the right wing fanatic activists are the
reason that Democrats will eventually win. There are many
people who are tired of the way Republicans are ruining this
country for their own personal gain and it is time that the
people of this country be taken into consideration.
Limbaugh/Boortz/Savage/Hannity/Liddy/Frist/Santorum/Bush/Rice/Rumsfield/Rove,
et. al. will be the ones that drive voters to the polls to
elect Democrats in the next elections.
I suppose it would be worthless to point out to someone
closed-minded like yourself that Bush's approval rating is
well under 50%. That means that over half the the country
actually disapprove of what he is doing. So, the more we get
the same type of poor leadership the better the chances are
that Republicans will be scorned in the next elections.
Republicans are desperate to hold on to power though, so I
expect the dirty election tricks to continue - if only
because Republicans are inherently dishonest and can only
win through dishonesty.
Tim
> Tim wrote:
>> Thats why we hope the lunatics from the far looney left keep
>> yelping, as that will guarantee many more Republican election
>> victories. Howard Dean, Boxer, Schumer, Roger Moore,
>> Ted Kennedy, Kerry, et al are some of the best friends
>> Republicans have.
>>
>
> Then again, all of the right wing fanatic activists are the reason that
> Democrats will eventually win. There are many people who are tired of the
> way Republicans are ruining this country for their own personal gain and
> it is time that the people of this country be taken into consideration.
> Limbaugh/Boortz/Savage/Hannity/Liddy/Frist/Santorum/Bush/Rice/Rumsfield/Rove,
> et. al. will be the ones that drive voters to the polls to elect Democrats
> in the next elections.
After each election that the Republicans pick up more seats in the
House and Senate, as well as state level offices, you say the
same thing.
zzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzz
kstahl
think that change is not inevitable, then you are not a good
student of history and you tend to only look at conditions
that exist right this moment. I'm glad that you and many
other Republicans do that because it is to the Democrats
great advantage if Republicans are short-sighted and don't
pay attention to history. All the current polls are very
emphatic in pointing out that the populace is turning away
from Republican demagoguery very quickly after the
disasterous elections this past November. Time will tell,
but the citizenry may be about to hand Republicans
politicians their heads on a platter with the mid-term
elections. You are also forgetting one thing - Democrats
have nothing to lose while Republicans have everything to lose.
Tim
Spin, spin, spin. Yes, we know, liberals live & die by polls,
and that is why they continue to lose elections.
Wake me up when you have a fresh idea to share with
us.
zzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzz
kstahl
> Spin, spin, spin. Yes, we know, liberals live & die by polls,
> and that is why they continue to lose elections.
> Wake me up when you have a fresh idea to share with
> us.
> zzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzz
>
>
>
>
what the Democrats are doing. Just keep copping those
zzzzz's. The wakeup call will come soon enough.
kstahl
> zzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzz
>
I just figured it out. You're Brett using a different name.
I should have checked this earlier. No wonder all of your
arguments are exactly the same style and form and ridiculous
arguments. Headers are pretty helpful in this type of thing.
Brett
> Tim wrote:
> > zzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzz
> >
>
> I just figured it out. You're Brett using a different name.
> I should have checked this earlier. No wonder all of your
> arguments are exactly the same style and form and ridiculous
> arguments. Headers are pretty helpful in this type of thing.
They are, however your problem is that you are incapable of actually
understanding what the header is telling you.
btw. You really should take a couple of computer courses somewhere because
it can't be too long now before you company actually finds out that you know
absolutely about the job you are supposed to be performing and fires you.
Not being able to read the contents of a simple header indicates that the
rest of your claimed computer skills are just as weak.
Tim
> Tim wrote:
>> Spin, spin, spin. Yes, we know, liberals live & die by polls,
>> and that is why they continue to lose elections.
>> Wake me up when you have a fresh idea to share with
>> us.
>> zzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzz
>>
>>
>>
>>
> That's right. Go to sleep and don't pay any attention to what the
> Democrats are doing. Just keep copping those zzzzz's. The wakeup call will
> come soon enough.
>
zzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzz
Tim
> Tim wrote:
>> zzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzz
>>
>
> I just figured it out. You're Brett using a different name. I should have
> checked this earlier. No wonder all of your arguments are exactly the same
> style and form and ridiculous arguments. Headers are pretty helpful in
> this type of thing.
>
zzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzz
Tim
Oh oh, Stahl has been unmasked.
ROTFLMAO!
kstahl
yourself. How pathetic is that, Scott B(rett) Riddle?
Gee, somehow I've survived in this career since 1980 and
have never been fired. Are you saying that my employers are
so daft they haven't been able to recognize your phony and
uninformed analysis for over 25 years?
Tim
Getting a bit defensive Stahl? Nevertheless, Brett made the
remarks, not I. Moreover, it appears he hit a nerve, pehaps
close to the truth? LOL
Brett
As I have told you before moron, I'm not Scott Riddle and I'm also not Tim.
As I said if you were actually computer literate you would be able to read a
simple header - you have demonstrated multiple times that you can not.
> Gee, somehow I've survived in this career since 1980 and
> have never been fired.
You claimed to have gone to work at the CIA in 1980 and you claimed to have
picked up some computer skills during your time there. Your recent posts
indicate those skills are not as extensive as you claim they are.
> Are you saying that my employers are
> so daft they haven't been able to recognize your phony and
> uninformed analysis for over 25 years?
Actually you're the moron with the claim was that your government employer
(CIA) was so daft that they didn't give you the position you claimed you
deserved.
Also the only evidence we have that you are gainfully employed in the
business are your posts that you are (which is NO EVIDENCE AT ALL). Several
recent posts indicate you have very limited abilities if any.
kstahl
> Getting a bit defensive Stahl? Nevertheless, Brett made the
> remarks, not I. Moreover, it appears he hit a nerve, pehaps
> close to the truth? LOL
>
But it gets pretty pathetic when you use two different names
to post and reply to your own messages.
Brett
> Tim wrote:
> > Getting a bit defensive Stahl? Nevertheless, Brett made the
> > remarks, not I. Moreover, it appears he hit a nerve, pehaps
> > close to the truth? LOL
> >
>
> But it gets pretty pathetic when you use two different names
> to post and reply to your own messages.
Stahl, you and Nada shave around the same pimple while looking in the
mirror.
Tim
Navy SEAL, went on numerous hi-profile clandestine missions,
and had worked for several years for the CIA. Real Navy
SEALS exposed him as a fraud. In reality, the guy worked as
a stock clerk for Staples, moonlighted nights at Burger King,
served two years in the army as a cook, and always held menial
labor jobs.