Taliban Use American Uniforms In Effective New War Tactic
Wassup Mang!
Taliban Use American Uniforms In Effective New War Tactic
Nov 04, 2003
By Zafir Jamaal, JUS
In the outskirts of the capital city of Kabul, twelve Coalition
soldiers have been killed due to an effective new war tactic being
employed with the Taliban. The Taliban are wore American and coalition
uniforms in this attack, which allowed them to get deep inside the
coalition close camp. Some Taliban were martyred in the attack however
the number is unknown at this time. After the attack, the Afghans
soldiers expressed concern over this new tactic.
Taliban attacks in the provinces of Khandahar, Ouruzgan and have
resulted in deaths of dozens of Afghan militia and their allies as the
daily attacks take their toll on both sides and continue to escalate.
In Khandahar, a convoy of patrolling Coalition forces has been
attacked killing five soldiers. At least two of the dead were members
of the Afghan National Army however the nationality of the rest is not
known. Meanwhile in Ouruzgan, nine coalition soldiers have been killed
by Taliban Mujahideen using rockets and automatic weapons, with one
believed to be an American. Four Taliban were believed to be martyred
in the attack.
Warlords Continue to Wage Brutal Battles
Infighting is continuing in the Afghanistan, with ten more people
killed in Khandahar in fights between the so-called National Army and
the police. The Army represents the regime of Hamid Karzai, while
police represent the Governor of the province. In the province of
Sar-e-Pol, the barbaric forces of General Dostum and Commander Atta,
both part of the government of Hamid Karzai, have resulted in the
deaths of a mother and her son. It is the practice of the Northern
Alliance troops to pay no attention to the lives of innocent civilians
when they are engaged in the brutal fighting typical amongst warlords.
Scores of civilians have been killed in recent weeks as the warlords
settle their disputes and try to consolidate power in advance of the
elections.
High Command Sends In More Support
Due to the rise of Taliban attacks on American and Afghan soldiers,
Daily Ausaf is reporting that American high command has decided to
send in more troops and helicopters to support the operation being
held in the country. This will drain the resources of the Americans
even more and stretch the already over stretched army even more. The
spokesman for the Americans in Kabul, Rodney Davis said in a press
briefing that Afghanistan will get 400 additional crack Special Forces
troops and a new fleet of helicopters will also be used to guard the
bases from Taliban attacks. The new Special Ops unit will focus on
anti-Taliban operations and will boost the 7500 American soldiers
already stationed there. In the recent attacks by Taliban, 100
American and Afghan soldiers have been killed.
http://www.jihadunspun.net/intheatre_internal.php?article=82616&list=/home.php&
Ron Hammon
Wassup Mang! wrote:
>
> Could this story be propaganda?
>
> Taliban Use American Uniforms In Effective New War Tactic
> Nov 04, 2003
> By Zafir Jamaal, JUS
>
> In the outskirts of the capital city of Kabul, twelve Coalition
> soldiers have been killed due to an effective new war tactic being
> employed with the Taliban. The Taliban are wore American and coalition
> uniforms in this attack, which allowed them to get deep inside the
> coalition close camp. Some Taliban were martyred in the attack however
> the number is unknown at this time. After the attack, the Afghans
> soldiers expressed concern over this new tactic.
>
snip
Well, one thing that hints at validity is the rumored huge shipments of
used BDUs to Afghanistan. I used to be big into selling Army surplus.
In the wake of the 9/11 attack, the Feds stopped releasing the stream of
good, old used BDUs (army uniforms) to the U.S. public. Fighting
terrorism was the excuse. (What the hell camo had to do with 9/11 is
beyond me.)
I kept checking for used BDUs. I heard a rumor from a truck driver that
warehouses near Atlanta were crammed against the roof with BDUs with no
where to go. The next rumor was that the government had decided to ship
this swell of uniforms to Afghanistan. (Still "fighting terrorism", I
guess! The Feds apparently fear U.S. citizens more than foreign
extremists.) Now, this report meshes nicely with the theme.
--
Ron Hammon
Remove the "y" from ".nyet", when present, to reach me.
Unknown
On Wed, 05 Nov 2003 04:38:20 -0500, Wassup Mang! <w...@ssup.org> wrote:
> Could this story be propaganda?
Perhaps, but I believe that under the "rules" of War, any combatant
caught wearing the uniform of the opposition can be summarily
executed, in the field. If so, it might be useful to make a few of
these savages caught wearing the uniform "examples" for the rest.
Time to finish the job in Afghanistan, and de-louse that country of
the sicko Talibans once and for all time.
Karl
>
> On Wed, 05 Nov 2003 04:38:20 -0500, Wassup Mang! <w...@ssup.org> wrote:
>
>
>>Could this story be propaganda?
>
>
> Perhaps, but I believe that under the "rules" of War, any combatant
> caught wearing the uniform of the opposition can be summarily
> executed, in the field. If so, it might be useful to make a few of
> these savages caught wearing the uniform "examples" for the rest.
>
> Time to finish the job in Afghanistan, and de-louse that country of
> the sicko Talibans once and for all time.
If that was going to happen, it would have done by now. America has
achieved its objective in Afghanistan. And the objective was not human
rights. The Bush administration had lost interest in that war by early-2002.
1066
> On Wed, 05 Nov 2003 04:38:20 -0500, Wassup Mang! <w...@ssup.org> wrote:
>
> > Could this story be propaganda?
>
> Perhaps, but I believe that under the "rules" of War, any combatant
> caught wearing the uniform of the opposition can be summarily
> executed, in the field. If so, it might be useful to make a few of
> these savages caught wearing the uniform "examples" for the rest.
>
Interesting idea. The Americans will probably end up shooting anyone
they see in an American uniform, and save the Taliban the trouble.
> Time to finish the job in Afghanistan, and de-louse that country of
> the sicko Talibans once and for all time.
>
It's actually the Taliban who are de-lousing the country of US troops.
The U.S. is currently trying to negotiate with various Taliban
members, as the Taliban is kicking some serious ass.
The U.S. is trying to save face in a war that it is losing.
> >Taliban Use American Uniforms In Effective New War Tactic
> >Nov 04, 2003
> >By Zafir Jamaal, JUS
> >
> >In the outskirts of the capital city of Kabul, twelve Coalition
> >soldiers have been killed due to an effective new war tactic being
> >employed with the Taliban. The Taliban are wore American and coalition
> >uniforms in this attack, which allowed them to get deep inside the
> >coalition close camp. Some Taliban were martyred in the attack however
> >the number is unknown at this time. After the attack, the Afghans
> >soldiers expressed concern over this new tactic.
> >
> >Taliban attacks in the provinces of Khandahar, Ouruzgan and have
> >resulted in deaths of dozens of Afghan militia and their allies as the
> >daily attacks take their toll on both sides and continue to escalate.
> >In Khandahar, a convoy of patrolling Coalition forces has been
> >attacked killing five soldiers. At least two of the dead were members
> >of the Afghan National Army however the nationality of the rest is not
> >known. Meanwhile in Ouruzgan, nine coalition soldiers have been killed
> >by Taliban Mujahideen using rockets and automatic weapons, with one
> >believed to be an American. Four Taliban were believed to be martyred
> >in the attack.
> >
That's not the first time.
_a_da_spam@nospam.com ฿ละลงง
news:bcff4570.0311...@posting.google.com...
> The U.S. is trying to save face in a war that it is losing.
We can always take the gloves off. http://www.imagedump.com/pics/3090.jpg
Karl
You see, it's that attitude that gets planes flown into buildings.
Ron Hammon
You can't make a frontal assualt on guerilla fighters. That's how we
won the Revolutionary War, remember? That's how we lost Vietnam,
remember? Has it really been so long since the fall of Vietnam that the
living population has forgotten the lesson learned?
Kafou Lobo
That was cold, brotherman. Once again, I emailed you the instructions
on how to killfile all those KlucKKers. You have got mail, again.
Kafou "Lemme know." Lobo
_a_da_spam@nospam.com ฿ละลงง
news:3FAA9D...@charter.nyet...
> You can't make a frontal assualt on guerilla fighters
But we can spray down their turd-world countries with nerve agents after the
West decides it has had enough of Islamic bullshit. Fuck sending in troops.
_a_da_spam@nospam.com ฿ละลงง
"Karl" <petersenk...@yahoo.co.uk> wrote in message
news:3faa9877$0$19527$afc3...@news.easynet.co.uk...
And after enough acts of terror, especially ones that finally plunge the
world into another Great Depression, the West will just say, "Enough," and
start wiping out the populations of the Muslim world, not with nukes or
troops, but with chemicals dispensed from RPV's. The much-touted "War of
Civilizations" will amount to little more than history's greatest genocide.
Ron Hammon
So, you want to wage war against a religion, not combatents? How would
you treat Islamic Americans, fire up the ovens?
Unknown
The objective was to rid the country, and world, of the ghastly
Taliban, and install a decent government, at least somewhat
representative of the Afghan people. I didn't realize how much ya
missed the Taliban; few other non-Taliban people in the world have.
PM Karzan is a fine fellow, with a lot of work still lying ahead of
him.
Karl
> The objective was to rid the country, and world, of the ghastly
> Taliban, and install a decent government, at least somewhat
> representative of the Afghan people.
Neither has happened. Yes, the Taliban have been removed from power and
few mourn their passing. But they are growing in strength in their core
areas, and religious extremism still pervades Afghan society, rolling
back many gains made by women. The warlords control the areas that are
not in the hands of religious extremists. In either case, human rights
abuses are among the worst in the world.
Karzai's government has little power outside Kabul and only rules Kabul
with the help of peacekeeping troops. The fact that he's an ex-Unocal
employee leads to great suspicion as to whether he is more
representative of Afghan or US interests.
http://www.corpwatch.org/news/PND.jsp?articleid=1149
Peacekeepers in Kabul are being attacked regularly. German and Canadian
troops have been killed there in recent times.
> I didn't realize how much ya
> missed the Taliban; few other non-Taliban people in the world have.
I don't miss them. The bombs did. The US had little interest in
"freeing" or rebuilding Afghanistan. The past two years speak for
themselves.
> PM Karzan is a fine fellow, with a lot of work still lying ahead of
> him.
He may be a nice guy, but does not have the mandate to lead Afghanistan.
US interest there is reduced to ensuring pipeline security.
Karl
> On Thu, 06 Nov 2003 18:52:38 +0000, Karl
> <petersenk...@yahoo.co.uk> wrote:
>
>
>>฿ละลงง wrote:
>>
>>>"1066" <wi10...@yahoo.com> wrote in message
>>>news:bcff4570.0311...@posting.google.com...
>>>
>>>
>>>>The U.S. is trying to save face in a war that it is losing.
>>>
>>>
>>>We can always take the gloves off. http://www.imagedump.com/pics/3090.jpg
>>
>>You see, it's that attitude that gets planes flown into buildings.
>
>
> That was cold, brotherman.
Sigh, I know. Temporary rise in blood pressure. On the other hand, what
do you think might happen to the US in response to Bush playing with one
of his new "mini nukes"?
> Once again, I emailed you the instructions
> on how to killfile all those KlucKKers. You have got mail, again.
I don't see it... I have a new account: petersenkarl instead of
karlpetersen, and make sure you use .co.uk instead of .com.
Laura Bush - America's kid-killer
I can just hear Codpiece George calling this tactic UNFAIR. After he
invades and bombs to hell two defenseless countries.
Dan
The Muslim woman's in veil focus is her home, the "nest" where her
children are born and reared. She is the "home" maker, the taproot
that sustains the spiritual life of the family, nurturing and training
her children,providing refuge and support to her husband.
In contrast, the bikinied Western Christians/Jew sluts practically
naked in front of millions, she belongs to herself. In
practice,paradoxically,she is public property. She belongs to no one
and everyone. She shops her body to the highest bidder. She is
auctioning herself all of the time.In western Christian/Jew sluts culture,
the cultural measure of a woman's value is her sex appeal
kstahl
Where does the bidding start?
Unknown
>Muslims women vs Christian/Jews sluts.
>
>The Muslim woman's in veil focus is her home, the "nest" where her
>children are born and reared. She is the "home" maker, the taproot
>that sustains the spiritual life of the family, nurturing and training
>her children,providing refuge and support to her husband.
Under the Taliban, and other Wahhabi sects, the woman is just a
mindless drone and incubator of babies. Nothing more.
Dan
The Muslim woman's in veil focus is her home, the "nest" where her
children are born and reared. She is the "home" maker, the taproot
that sustains the spiritual life of the family, nurturing and training
her children,providing refuge and support to her husband.
Jim
All the same, Benazir Bhutto amounted to something more in Pakistan. The US
has never had a woman rise that high in politics.
Unknown
Hey Dan, I think yer needle is stuck.
_a_da_spam@nospam.com ฿ละลงง
news:Fc9rb.16691$Oo4....@newsread1.news.atl.earthlink.net...
> All the same, Benazir Bhutto amounted to something more in Pakistan. The
> US has never had a woman rise that high in politics.
All she did was take her pappy's place, and not for very long.
Johnny Buffalo
American troops out of Afghanistan. Oh wait a minute, the taliban
isn't in power and American troops are still in control of
Afghanistan. You're an idiot.
Wassup Mang! <w...@ssup.org> wrote in message news:<b8hhqv05q8mgq53om...@4ax.com>...
Dan
Karl
You have a backward view of modern Islam. I've seen Muslim women on the
beach in bikinis. Over the years, more than one "good" Muslim girl has
ended up in my bed.
Islam is the same as any other religion - some people take it seriously,
others less so. Claims that any one religion is "superior", currently
flying from all sides, are all equally bogus.
Unknown
<petersenk...@yahoo.co.uk> wrote:
>Dan wrote:
>
>> Muslims women vs Christian/Jews sluts.
>>
>> The Muslim woman's in veil focus is her home, the "nest" where her
>> children are born and reared. She is the "home" maker, the taproot
>> that sustains the spiritual life of the family, nurturing and training
>> her children,providing refuge and support to her husband.
>>
>>
>> In contrast, the bikinied Western Christians/Jew sluts practically
>> naked in front of millions, she belongs to herself. In
>> practice,paradoxically,she is public property. She belongs to no one
>> and everyone. She shops her body to the highest bidder. She is
>> auctioning herself all of the time.In western Christian/Jew sluts culture,
>> the cultural measure of a woman's value is her sex appeal
>
>You have a backward view of modern Islam. I've seen Muslim women on the
>beach in bikinis. Over the years, more than one "good" Muslim girl has
>ended up in my bed.
Omigod. If Bin Laden or any member of Al Qaeda reads this, they're
going to be tracking ya down like a hunter. They are not very
tolerant folks, ya know. Especially when it comes to women.
>Islam is the same as any other religion - some people take it seriously,
>others less so.
And some, like Bin Laden, take it "seriously" enough to put 19 young
miscreants and mental defectives on planes to do his dirty deeds (but
curiously, Bin Laden didn't take it THAT seriously enough to climb
aboard one of the planes himself).
Thom
wrote:
>That must be why the Taliban is back in power and have forced all
>American troops out of Afghanistan. Oh wait a minute, the taliban
>isn't in power and American troops are still in control of
>Afghanistan. You're an idiot.
he'se an idiot but we don't control Afghanistan. Some areas are
slipping back, others are controlled by War Lords who are again
growing poppies for the huge profits Americans are willing to give
them for their dope.
THOM
Thom
Bin Laden and Bush are exactly alike in that respect, they send other
people's kids to do their dirty work but never themselves or their
family.
THOM
>
Vendicar Decarian
"Thom" <thoma...@yahoo.com.au> wrote in message
news:3fb17344...@news.melbpc.org.au...
> Bin Laden and Bush are exactly alike in that respect, they send other
> people's kids to do their dirty work but never themselves or their
> family.
The difference of course is that Bush is a coward while oll Binny is a brave
hero of private, unfettered capitalism. Bush has an IQ of 88 while Binny
is a master planner.
Consider the magnifying effect. a couple of million in funding by Binny has
caused the Bush puppet to spend nearly one trillion.
Lets divide shall we?
1,000,000,000,000
---------------------
2,000,000
= 500,000
So BinLaden's damage to AmeriKKKa has been magnified by a factor of a half
Million by the Illiterate Bush Puppet.
Snicker.
Unknown
wrote:
To even compare the President of the US with the filthy vermin rat
gangster Bin Laden in the same sentence is preposterous.
Thom
why? do you like Bin Laden more? At least Bin Laden doesn't wear a
tie (commonly known as the capialist penis substitute) :-)
THOM
George Minter
> >To even compare the President of the US with the filthy vermin rat
> >gangster Bin Laden in the same sentence is preposterous.
> >
> why? do you like Bin Laden more? At least Bin Laden doesn't wear a
> tie (commonly known as the capialist penis substitute) :-)
So if you were a capialist (and knew how to spell)
you would be shoving ties up your ass?
Karl
Bush is a gangster of the highest order. He can even send US troops to
their deaths to secure lucrative contracts for his wealthy WASP buddies.
Thom
wrote:
well thats the best place for them. You see most fat cats have no
idea what they mean and their history. The neck tie actually started
out as underwear. It ran from the neck to the crotch and was used to
soak up sweat so that leather and or metal body armour wouldn't be
damaged by salty sweat. Some how they changed into fashion statements
and the pointed shape was to emulate a sword called a "Gladius". The
knot represents the hilt of the sword and the length (22") is the same
length as the Gladius. Measure your tie some times. This is why many
see the business necktie as a penius substitute or a power thing (the
sword).
The tie was quite populat until the cravette came along but when that
died as a fashion thing the tie gradually came back especially in the
lower classes of England.
Class dismissed and no ties at work from now on.
THOM
The Holy Kafir
Mr. Marx here thinks he's going to win people over to his side with such
statements.
Kwami Infusee
> blah, blah, blah...
> Class dismissed and no ties at work from now on.
You can institute that rule in your own business.
But, you don't own your own biz, do you?
Never have, have you?
Not smart enough, are you?
Karl
>>Bush is a gangster of the highest order. He can even send US troops to
>>their deaths to secure lucrative contracts for his wealthy WASP buddies.
>
>
> Mr. Marx here thinks he's going to win people over to his side with such
> statements.
I can tell you that many British relatives of military dead think this
way; as Bush will hear for himself when he visits London later this week.
I'd guess that many relatives of dead American servicemen will also feel
the same way, especially as the Bush regime has censored media coverage
of military funerals for political reasons.
The people who the troops are fighting for seem to have the lowest
possible opinion of their troops' lives - exactly as Vietnam veterans
also found.
The Holy Kafir
> The Holy Kafir wrote:
> >>Bush is a gangster of the highest order. He can even send US troops to
> >>their deaths to secure lucrative contracts for his wealthy WASP buddies.
> >
> >
> > Mr. Marx here thinks he's going to win people over to his side with such
> > statements.
>
> I can tell you that many British relatives of military dead think this
> way; as Bush will hear for himself when he visits London later this week.
That he is a "gangster"? Funny. Do they base their entire lives on
hyperbole?
>
> I'd guess that many relatives of dead American servicemen will also feel
> the same way, especially as the Bush regime has censored media coverage
> of military funerals for political reasons.
Censored funeral? Sorry, I've seen many on TV. Get your facts straight, you
can start at around 1991.
>
> The people who the troops are fighting for seem to have the lowest
> possible opinion of their troops' lives - exactly as Vietnam veterans
> also found.
You've just exposed your ignorance, thanks for playing.
Thom
wrote:
>Thom wrote:
>> blah, blah, blah...
>> Class dismissed and no ties at work from now on.
>
>You can institute that rule in your own business.
>But, you don't own your own biz, do you?
Yup, 17 years two of them
Now I'm a "consultant" (you guys love that word so I'll use it.)
>Never have, have you?
>Not smart enough, are you?
smart enought to know how corrupt capitalism is and if I care for my
soul I'd better get out.
If I may quote your god Joshua Bin Joseph (AKA Jesus Christ) "It is
easier for a camel to pass through they eye of a needle than for a
rich man to go to heaven" OR "To get to heaven sell all your own,
give it to the poor and follow me".
THOM
Karl
> "Karl" <petersenk...@yahoo.co.uk> wrote in message
> news:3fb8dd38$0$13755$afc3...@news.easynet.co.uk...
>
>>The Holy Kafir wrote:
>>
>>>>Bush is a gangster of the highest order. He can even send US troops to
>>>>their deaths to secure lucrative contracts for his wealthy WASP buddies.
>>>
>>>
>>>Mr. Marx here thinks he's going to win people over to his side with such
>>>statements.
>>
>>I can tell you that many British relatives of military dead think this
>>way; as Bush will hear for himself when he visits London later this week.
>
>
> That he is a "gangster"? Funny. Do they base their entire lives on
> hyperbole?
Good point - no, there are a wide variety of anti-war sentiments (as
well as those who still believe in the war). They vary from "Bush is
naive" to "Bush is a crook". The illegal privitisation - essentially
theft - of all Iraqi state industry makes me believe the latter.
PS - in the interests of balance I should point out that a UK poll today
shows a majority in favour of Bush's visit: 43% welcome his arrival, 36%
say he shouldn't be coming. However, given the strength of the past
US/British relationship, Bush is relatively unpopular compared to past
presidents.
>>I'd guess that many relatives of dead American servicemen will also feel
>>the same way, especially as the Bush regime has censored media coverage
>>of military funerals for political reasons.
>
>
> Censored funeral? Sorry, I've seen many on TV. Get your facts straight, you
> can start at around 1991.
In 1990, Bush Sr. allowed military funerals to be censored. According to
the UK Guardian: "For the next 12 years the ban was largely ignored,
even after it was extended to all military bases during the last days of
the Clinton administration. But this March, shortly before the war
began, the Pentagon handed down a directive that made it perfectly clear
it expected the policy to be heeded."
Full story: http://www.guardian.co.uk/g2/story/0,3604,1079608,00.html
Bruce Massey
> >> blah, blah, blah...
> >> Class dismissed and no ties at work from now on.
> >
> >You can institute that rule in your own business.
> >But, you don't own your own biz, do you?
>
> Yup, 17 years two of them
Liar.
You NEVER had to meet a payroll, have you?
> Now I'm a "consultant" (you guys love that word so I'll use it.)
What's the name of your "consultant" company?
LosersRus?
> >Never have, have you?
> >Not smart enough, are you?
>
> smart enought to know how corrupt capitalism is and if I care for my
> soul I'd better get out.
You lost your soul when your wife died
because you wouldn't spend your own money
for her health care. Shame on you.
>
> If I may quote your god Joshua Bin Joseph (AKA Jesus Christ) "It is
> easier for a camel to pass through they eye of a needle than for a
> rich man to go to heaven" OR
Come on, liar.
You were never rich, were you?
If you were, why didn't you spend your own money
to take care of your wife in her time of need?
> "To get to heaven sell all your own,
> give it to the poor and follow me".
So Jesus resides in Australia?
Billy Whistler
<petersenk...@yahoo.co.uk> wrote:
>>
>> Censored funeral? Sorry, I've seen many on TV. Get your facts straight, you
>> can start at around 1991.
>
>In 1990, Bush Sr. allowed military funerals to be censored. According to
>the UK Guardian: "For the next 12 years the ban was largely ignored,
>even after it was extended to all military bases during the last days of
>the Clinton administration. But this March, shortly before the war
>began, the Pentagon handed down a directive that made it perfectly clear
>it expected the policy to be heeded."
>
Cameras are not allowed to show the caskets of slain service men at
military bases, not military funerals. Can't you fucking read?
The Frog
All you care about is the political use this might have for you.......
+++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
"The multicultural project will never fully succeed if 'diversity'
is defined as one's own preferred ideologies and political groups."
--Richard E. Redding, "Grappling With Diverse Conceptions of Diversity,"
American Psychologist, April 2002, p. 301.
Karl
So you have seen military funerals televised this year, have you?
Billy Whistler
I've seen them covered on the news, with video and everything, so yes.
what I haven't seen is pictures of caskets coming off airplanes at
Dover AF Base, because that's what's banned. Got it?
Karl
So what do you think about government censorship in the land of the free?