On Friday, 2 November 2012 16:20:32 UTC-7, Mike Ellis wrote:
Are you really on 3.0.8?
Sorry, that should have been 3.8.8 :-) I will see if I can fix it in my original post :-) We are actually looking at upgrading to RT4, so at the same time I am working with a dataset in testing an upgrade :-)
I thought about preceding the CFs with numbers and or lower-case letters also, but it makes it look ugly. Also, many of the CFs are going to be shared amongst different asset types and I may want them to appear in a different order on different asset types (I don't know for sure as we are still planning out the fields we want for each type but there is definitely going to be common/shared CFs amongst the asset types)