Anyone switching to the new RT Assets plugin?

[Todd Chapman]

Just wondering what your impressions are.

Seems like a great idea!

;)

[Joop]

Todd Chapman wrote:
> Just wondering what your impressions are.
>
> Seems like a great idea!
>

I'm considering switching but need to convert my old assets to new
assets. Haven't figured out yet how to do that.
Anyone any ideas?

Joop

[Don Gourley]

I am interested in this topic also. It would have been nice if BestPractical had provided a migration path but I guess the clients who paid for this didn't have that requirement. I imagine that an export from AT could be massaged into an import file for Assets, but what about all the old artifacts in the database -- is there a way to cleanly uninstall AT?

On the other hand if AT works in 4.2 (we are still on 4.0.17) and the community will continue to support it, then i don't have any particular need to switch.

--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "at-users" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to at-users+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com.
To post to this group, send email to at-u...@googlegroups.com.
Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/at-users.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.

[Sfu Mbb]

Hi ... I'm very interested too. I'm currently running Asset Tracker 2.0.0b1 on RT 4.0.8 and so far it does everything I need it to. 

Someone on the

 rt-u...@lists.bestpractical.com

maillist has posted about an issue around an easy way to linking assets to tickets, to other assets and tickets to assets). Not sure if its a functionality issue or user familiarity issue but no replies so far from BP

http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/rt/users/123193

Hopefully it will be as (eventually?)  high-functioning as your Asset Tracker plugin! In the meantime, I'm prepared to wait. Not sure how arduous the import data from Asset tracker .xls to RT Assets would be. 

[Brumm, Torsten / Kuehne + Nagel / Ham GI-ID]

Hi,

my few ideas.

 

I have checked out Asset 1.0 for RT 4.2 and I’m not happy with it, main functions are not available yet. Compared to AT it is still a very, very first ALPHA and far away from something useable. OK we have to push AT to be ready for RT 4.2.

Torsten

 

Von: at-u...@googlegroups.com [mailto:at-u...@googlegroups.com] Im Auftrag von Don Gourley
Gesendet: Mittwoch, 12. März 2014 22:29
An: at-u...@googlegroups.com
Betreff: Re: Anyone switching to the new RT Assets plugin?

 

I am interested in this topic also. It would have been nice if BestPractical had provided a migration path but I guess the clients who paid for this didn't have that requirement. I imagine that an export from AT could be massaged into an import file for Assets, but what about all the old artifacts in the database -- is there a way to cleanly uninstall AT?

 

On the other hand if AT works in 4.2 (we are still on 4.0.17) and the community will continue to support it, then i don't have any particular need to switch.

 

On Wed, Mar 12, 2014 at 3:17 PM, Joop <jvd...@xs4all.nl> wrote:

Todd Chapman wrote:

Just wondering what your impressions are.

Seems like a great idea!

I'm considering switching but need to convert my old assets to new assets. Haven't figured out yet how to do that.
Anyone any ideas?

Joop

--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "at-users" group.

To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to at-users+u...@googlegroups.com.

To post to this group, send email to at-u...@googlegroups.com.
Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/at-users.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.

 

--

You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "at-users" group.

To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to at-users+u...@googlegroups.com.

To post to this group, send email to at-u...@googlegroups.com.
Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/at-users.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.

Kühne + Nagel (AG & Co.) KG
Rechtsform: Kommanditgesellschaft, Bremen HRA 21928, USt-IdNr.: DE 812773878.
Geschäftsleitung Kühne + Nagel (AG & Co.) KG: Reiner Heiken (Vors.), Dirk Blesius, Martin Brinkmann, Holger Ketz, Jan-Hendrik Köstergarten, Christian Marnetté, Christian Solf, Jens Wollesen.
Persönlich haftende Gesellschafterin: Kühne & Nagel A.G., Rechtsform: Aktiengesellschaft nach luxemburgischem Recht, HR-Nr.: B 18745, Geschäftsführendes Verwaltungsratsmitglied: Karl Gernandt.
Geschäftsleitung Region Westeuropa: Yngve Ruud (Vors.), Hans-Georg Brinkmann (Stellv.), Richard Huhn, Björn Johansson, Bruno Mang, Stefan Paul, Tim Scharwath, Dominic Edmonds, Peder Winther.

Wir arbeiten ausschließlich auf Grundlage der Allgemeinen Deutschen Spediteursbedingungen (ADSp), jeweils neuester Fassung. Wir verweisen insbesondere auf die vom Gesetz abweichenden Haftungsbeschränkungen von Ziffer 23 und 24 ADSp. Den vollständigen Text der ADSp übersenden wir Ihnen gerne auf Anfrage und können Sie auch unter http://www.kuehne-nagel.com einsehen. Ergänzend wird vereinbart, dass (1) Ziffer 27 ADSp im Rahmen internationaler Übereinkommen weder unsere Haftung noch die Zurechnung des Verschuldens von Leuten und sonstigen Dritten zu Gunsten des Auftraggebers erweitert, und (2) wir in den im deutschen Seehandelsrecht aufgeführten Fällen des nautischen Verschuldens oder Feuer an Bord nur für eigenes Verschulden und (3) im Sinne der CMNI genannten Voraussetzungen nicht für nautisches Verschulden, Feuer an Bord oder Mängel des Schiffes haften.

[Don Gourley]

Has anyone tried AT with RT 4.2.x?  -Don

[Brumm, Torsten / Kuehne + Nagel / Ham GI-ID]

Gives errors at the moment