Cycle 5 funding requests and ideas
Changes relative to the previous cycle
The primary change for Cycle 5 (relative to Cycle 4) is that the Roadmap will be used to determine funding priorities. In addition, as the maintainers of the roadmap, the Strategic Planning and Organizing Committee (SPOC) will participate in funding request review, solicitation, and selection. Also, due to funding uncertainties, the period of performance and budgets should be just one year, as opposed to multiple years.
Funding goals
Funding requests (FR) which address one or more items on the Astropy Project’s Roadmap will be prioritized, with proposals that include work towards “red” and “orange” roadmap items being prioritized the most, since these have been identified by the community as being the most critical.
FRs shall foster the Astropy Project goals of community, shared work, and cooperation and shall be described, reviewed, and executed in this manner.
Funding amount
We anticipate a maximum of $250,000 (US) to be available for this funding cycle.
Period of Performance
The period of performance should be for one year. Ideally, Jan 1–Dec 31, 2026.
What can the funding be used for?
Money can be used for travel, subscriptions, etc, in addition to direct financial support to individuals, including individuals based outside of the United States.
Funding requests may be submitted even if they include the recruitment and hiring of another person to complete the task. See below: Open Hire Process.
The funds currently come from a NASA ROSES grant. NumFocus, the Project’s fiscal sponsor, and the Finance Committee assume responsibility for ensuring that all budgets are consistent with any applicable funding agency rules.
Funding Request Process Overview
We envision a two stage FR process to enable the community to discuss and improve ideas, to merge teams with similar ideas, and for the SPOC to ensure as much of the Roadmap as possible is being addressed.
Note that these dates are nominal, and unplanned events like extended government shutdowns could extend some of the dates/deadlines.
We aim to achieve broad consensus before the vote. Requesters are encouraged to combine ideas and teams, modify, or withdraw FRs during the discussion period, as appropriate. Discussion is open to anyone; it is not restricted to voting members.
Voting members of the Astropy Project vote on the FRs using thumbs up/down on a dedicated comment. Every voting member of the Astropy Project has equal voting rights.
The Coordination and Finance Committees will select FRs based on the voting results, alignment with the Roadmap, confirmation of available people to implement, and available funds.
How to Submit a Funding Request
Funding Requests (FRs) should be posted as pull requests to https://github.com/astropy/astropy-project/ with the initial title text "Cycle 5 Funding:". The goal is to make this process as easy as possible for everyone, so we impose a limit of 100 lines assuming 80 char/line. We provide a template: Cycle 5 template. Please place the file with your FR in the cycle 5 folder, the same location as the template.
Post-request process
Once selection is completed, an FR that is not selected does not continue further, although it can always be re-proposed. It is also possible that if more funds become available before the next cycle, a proposal may be accepted later but with a revised timieline.
If an FR is selected, congratulations! Now the work begins.
Once a proposal is accepted, the Finance Committee will assign a committee member contact to ensure invoices are submitted, process is followed, etc. At the same time, the Coordination Committee will assign a COTR (see below) for that FR.
The following general steps follow whan an FR is selected:
COTRs
As in last Cycle, all proposals will be assigned a COTR (Contracting Officer's Technical Representative). This concept is borrowed from government funding agencies, although it is to be stressed that Astropy's goal is to make the COTR role as low-overhead as possible.
COTR's key responsibilities include:
Fostering constructive discussion
We want to stay true to the "radical transparency" ethos of the Project and thus we are asking the community to comment on the FRs publicly. At the same time, we want to ensure that the conversations stay as constructive as possible to foster the Astropy Project’s commitment to maintaining a positive and welcoming culture. Thus, here we provide some example language that might help commenters stay constructive with their comments.
Example of non-constructive comments are:
Examples of constructive comments are:
If you are worried about your comments being perceived as inappropriate, you are welcome to send your feedback directly to the Finance Committee at fin...@astropy.org or ask on Slack. You are also welcome to use the “thumbs down” vote without adding comments. If you have any concerns about this process and the ensuing discussion that you would prefer to discuss privately, contact the ombudsperson at confid...@astropy.org.
Open hire process
FRs can include an “open hire” process to identify people to undertake the activities described. Should such a request be accepted, the Finance Committee will organize a recruitment process to find the right person (or people) to carry out the work. Members of the FR team will be asked to assist in the recruitment and hiring process. The number of open hire requests selected may be limited by Finance Committee staffing availability.
We envision a recruitment process that expands beyond the US Astronomy community and would include the various Research Software Engineering forums in addition to the AAS Job Register. We are in the process of putting together a hiring guide.
Template and examples
The following is a template proposal: template.md. You can also refer to successful Cycle II/3/4 Finalized FRs at this link, this one, or this one .