Annotation of Objects for Widefield Images

141 views
Skip to first unread message

S Eigell

unread,
Feb 3, 2014, 1:11:04 PM2/3/14
to astro...@googlegroups.com
It seems that there is some built-in threshold over which only Constellation-level Annotations are posted to Widefield Image Plate-Solves via nova.astrometry.net.
(http://nova.astrometry.net/user_images/208128#annotated - while Constellation IC NGC M and Star catalog object Tags were generated, only Constellation Lines were plotted onto Annotated Image)

Is the threshold a factor of FOV size ??  What value ??
Is an override presented anywhere within the nova.astrometry.net plate-solver UI ??

While the Star annotations would easily overwhelm the image, I'd love to see the large number of cataloged DSOs for this rich field...

Dustin Lang

unread,
Feb 3, 2014, 1:23:46 PM2/3/14
to astro...@googlegroups.com
Hi,

Being smarter (or letting the user choose) about labelling objects has been a long-time to-do item.

There are indeed a number of thresholds: the code is here in the annotated_image function:
http://astrometry.net/svn/trunk/src/astrometry/net/views/image.py

if rad > 10:
        args.append('--no-ngc')

	if rad > 30:
		args.append('--no-bright')


One option would be to download the Astrometry.net code and produce your own annotations -- the web service just runs the program "plotann.py" in the blind/ directory.

--dustin


S Eigell

unread,
Feb 3, 2014, 4:41:23 PM2/3/14
to astro...@googlegroups.com
Thanks,
But as my local astrometry.net is courtesy of an AstroTortilla installation with pre-compiled .exe and .dll resources (of an older code release - 0.38), I'll probably live with the knowledge that I need to use narrower sub-images (submitted to nova.astrometry.net - until AT updates to a build with the proper "plot-any -B" fix).  Chasing a proper build environment is a bit outside my current commitment level... 
 
Reply all
Reply to author
Forward
0 new messages