Hi Dustin, thanks for checking on this.
So, I think I was using the wrong index files (5000 series).
But I followed the instructions to construct a new index file with Sextractor output and that worked really well. BUT, still the solutions seem not good enough and the subtracted images show lots of dipoles at the position of stars and some galaxies. I include the run below:
solve-field J2211_4.fits --backend-config ../astrometry_config/astrometry.cfg --no-plots --no-remove-lines --uniformize 0 --crpix-center --depth 30,60,90,120,150,180,210,240,270,300,330,360,390,420,450,480 --cpulimit 360 --tweak-order 3 --scale-low 0.34299999999999997 --scale-high 0.357 --scale-units app --ra 332.84792 --dec -1.04028 --radius 0.15 --new-fits none --overwrite --out J2211_4 --dir .
Found an existing WCS header, will try to verify it.
Extracting sources...
simplexy: found 1164 sources.
Solving...
Reading file "./J2211_4.axy"...
Only searching for solutions within 0.15 degrees of RA,Dec (332.848,-1.04028)
Verifying WCS using indices with quads of size [1.16036, 11.6036] arcmin
Verifying WCS with index 1 of 1 (/home/plira/lilith/projects/sibling/analysis/eridanus/speculoos/astrometry_config/J2211_index_file.fits)
Verifying WCS of field 1.
log-odds ratio 176.135 (3.12202e+76), 114 match, 0 conflict, 1030 distractors, 123 index.
RA,Dec = (332.85,-1.03618), pixel scale 0.348107 arcsec/pix.
Hit/miss: Hit/miss: ---------------------+------------+-+++++++++++++---+-+-+-+--++-----++-+-+---+--+-+---+---+---+-++--
--> log-odds 176.135
Got 1 solutions.
Field 1 solved: writing to file ./J2211_4.solved to indicate this.
Field: J2211_4.fits
Field center: (RA,Dec) = (332.849916, -1.036473) deg.
Field center: (RA H:M:S, Dec D:M:S) = (22:11:23.980, -01:02:11.304).
Field size: 11.5826 x 11.5781 arcminutes
Field rotation angle: up is 179.753 degrees E of N
Field parity: neg
The huge number of detections is because there is a satellite trail in the image. Still, with 114 matches the solution should be pretty good, right? But it is not :(
In fact, when running swarp on the images I get the warning: > WARNING: Astrometric approximation too inaccurate for this re-projection.
I will try with the GAIA index files now.
Cheers!
Paulina.