VOTE YES NO ABSTAIN
VOTE YES NO ABSTAIN
Explanation summary
It is recommended that a wash down be done every 2 years as a minimum, and the building is presently well overdue. Of particular concern is the early evidence of corrosion, caused by salt deposits, to the underside of roof panels under the eaves, which really should be done more frequently than the total building wash down.
With regard to pressure cleaning of external concrete car parks / hardstand paths / stairwells, it can plainly be seen that this needs to be done. At the recent caretaker’s maintenance review it was suggested that this needs to be done every 6 months which makes this pressure clean well overdue.
Proposed schedule:-
Building Washdown & Paint at start of cycle
Building Washdown Year 3
Building Washdown Year 6
Building Washdown & Paint year 9
Estimated cost of Washdowns only -$2200
We have $3500 in this year’s budget for pressure cleaning
------------------------------------------------------------
Pressure clean under eaves only –Twice a year- Estimated cost $600 each N.B. this would be included in the cost of the building washdown , so in years 3/6/9 we would only need to budget for $600 not $1200
------------------------------------------------------------
Pressure clean of forecourt etc – Twice a year Estimated cost $440 each
------------------------------------------------------------------
Regards
Pam
Secretary
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Aspire Body Corporate Committee" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to aspire-body-corporate...@googlegroups.com.
To post to this group, send email to aspire-body-cor...@googlegroups.com.
Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/aspire-body-corporate-committee.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
<Quote 091400043 Aspire on Kings_wash.pdf>
<Postal vote 1 November 2014.docx>
My vote is yes to both.
Pam
--
Lorraine
I believe Richard is going to see if RAS are able to do this work.
Pam

No virus found in this message.
Checked by AVG - www.avg.com
Version: 2015.0.5315 / Virus Database: 4189/8487 - Release Date: 10/31/14
No virus found in this message.
Checked by AVG - www.avg.com
Version: 2015.0.5315 / Virus Database: 4189/8488 - Release Date: 10/31/14
Richard,
I vote “YES” to both.
Thanks
Michael Ryan
Managing Director
Beavis & Bartels Pty Ltd
M: 0401 765 757 I T: 07 3630 4744 I F: 07 3630 4755 I E: mr...@beavisbartels.com.au
8 Allworth Street, Northgate Qld 4013 I PO Box 392, Northgate, QLD 4013
|
|
BEAVIS & BARTELS PTY LTD HYDRAULIC SERVICES CONTRACTORS DESIGN & CONSTRUCT LICENSED WATER, SEWERAGE & GAS INSTALLATIONS… MAINTENANCE
|
Beavis & Bartels Pty Ltd asks that you please consider the environment before printing this email.
This communication is intended for use of the addressee(s) and may contain legally privileged and confidential information. If you are not the addressee you are notified that any transmission, distribution or replication of this message is strictly prohibited. The legal privilege and confidentiality attached to this email and its contents is not waived, lost or destroyed by reason of mistaken delivery to you. If you have received this message in error, please permanently delete the email from your system.
Email transmission cannot be guaranteed to be secure or error-free as information could be intercepted, corrupted, lost, destroyed, arrive late or incomplete, or contain viruses. The sender therefore does not accept liability for any errors or omissions in the contents of this message, which arise as a result of email transmission. If verification is required please request a hard-copy version.
From: aspire-body-cor...@googlegroups.com [mailto:aspire-body-cor...@googlegroups.com]
On Behalf Of Pam Burgess
Sent: Saturday, 1 November 2014 3:56 PM
To: aspire-body-cor...@googlegroups.com
Subject: Flying Minute - Building Wash down and Pressure Cleaning
Dear Committee Members
--
Hi Lorraine
I contacted RAS twice last week to see if they are a viable contractor for this work, so far I have not been able to get hold of their estimator.
I will try again but if I do not get a result , I will get another alternative quote. I will get back to you by the end of the week.
Regards
Richard Verschoyle
My vote is yes to both
Regards
Richard Verschoyle
From: aspire-body-cor...@googlegroups.com [mailto:aspire-body-cor...@googlegroups.com] On Behalf Of Pam Burgess
Sent: Saturday, 1 November 2014 3:56 PM
To: aspire-body-cor...@googlegroups.com
Subject: Flying Minute - Building Wash down and Pressure Cleaning
Dear Committee Members
--
Hi Lorraine
I contacted RAS twice last week to see if they are a viable contractor for this work, so far I have not been able to get hold of their estimator.
I will try again but if I do not get a result , I will get another alternative quote. I will get back to you by the end of the week.
Regards
Richard Verschoyle
From: aspire-body-cor...@googlegroups.com [mailto:aspire-body-cor...@googlegroups.com] On Behalf Of Pam Burgess
Sent: Saturday, 1 November 2014 5:34 PM
To: aspire-body-cor...@googlegroups.com
Subject: RE: Flying Minute - Building Wash down and Pressure Cleaning
Lorraine
I believe Richard is going to see if RAS are able to do this work.
Pam
<image001.jpg>
I am a YES for both motions
Regards
Barry Keegan
From: aspire-body-cor...@googlegroups.com [mailto:aspire-body-cor...@googlegroups.com]
On Behalf Of Pam Burgess
Sent: Saturday, 1 November 2014 3:56 PM
To: aspire-body-cor...@googlegroups.com
Subject: Flying Minute - Building Wash down and Pressure Cleaning
Dear Committee Members
--
Dear Committee
You will now have received an EGM notice. Please be advised that the Secretary was not involved in calling this meeting. I have not received any notice from 25% of owners. I have requested to see the information from Michael Wylie. Richard has taken it upon himself to circumnavigate this committee and call the meeting himself, again showing his lack of knowledge of process.
I note that the EGM is scheduled for a Friday. Which will mean it is almost impossible for people to attend. Committee members have made it abundantly clear that they can only attend meetings on a Saturday, so why is the EGM being held on a Friday?
I propose this as a flying minute, that the EGM date be changed to Saturday, 13 December to allow as many owners to attend as possible.
Would you please vote:
Yes No Abstain
Thanks
Pam
From: aspire-body-cor...@googlegroups.com [mailto:aspire-body-cor...@googlegroups.com] On Behalf Of Kelvin & Marion Choo
Sent: Wednesday, November 12, 2014 2:48 PM
To: aspire-body-cor...@googlegroups.com
No virus found in this message.
Checked by AVG - www.avg.com
Version: 2015.0.5315 / Virus Database: 4213/8556 - Release Date: 11/11/14
No virus found in this message.
Checked by AVG - www.avg.com
Version: 2015.0.5315 / Virus Database: 4213/8557 - Release Date: 11/11/14
Nine owners out of fifteen have requested this E.G.M. so it could be concluded that the motion to dissolve the committee will be carried.
The first motion will be to approve the 2014 A.G.M. minutes, the second motion will be to dissolve the committee, and after that is the closure of the meeting, no general or other matters will be discussed. On this basis owners do not necessarily need to attend.
Therefore I vote NO
Re.this Saturdays committee meeting, I am keen to proceed as there is a lot of work to be done, but in light of the impending E.G.M. we should not be making any controversial decisions. Having said this I believe that making a start on the managers review will be worthwhile even though whatever we come up with will need to be ratified by any new committee, the manager, and subsequently a general meeting.
Regards
Richard Verschoyle
From: aspire-body-cor...@googlegroups.com [mailto:aspire-body-cor...@googlegroups.com] On Behalf Of Pam Burgess
Sent: Thursday, 13 November 2014 9:14 AM
To: aspire-body-cor...@googlegroups.com
Subject: RE: Flying Minute - move EGM date to a Saturday
Dear Committee
Dear Committee
Richard’s statement below about the business of the EGM is incorrect. An election will also be conducted for a new committee. Surely given the grounds for sacking the committee, those responsible would want to ensure that every owner had the opportunity to attend.
The funny thing is that last year’s nominations were the only legitimate process that Aspire has had for some time, if you consider Cameron’s ineligible election to the committee previously and multiple nominations that I feel sure have occurred not only last year but in the past.
So my vote is yes.
Pam Burgess
CEO
M 0402 181 301
E p...@developingfoundation.org.au

14 Munro St
Auchenflower
QLD 4066
www.developingfoundation.org.au
T: 07 3871 0530
F: 07 3870 1123
Version: 2015.0.5557 / Virus Database: 4213/8563 - Release Date: 11/12/14
No virus found in this message.
Checked by AVG - www.avg.com
Version: 2015.0.5557 / Virus Database: 4213/8563 - Release Date: 11/12/14
Hi Pam
I feel that you may be confused.
My interpretation of the B.C.P. Strata E.G.M. is that the E.G.M. to be held 12/12/14 is to “Dissolve the current committee and call for nominations”
There will be no election.
However, only if the motion above is passed, and owners vote for it , there would be a second E.G.M. to be held 8/1/15.
We are going through a difficult phase at the moment, and I am trying not to inflame an already volatile situation so I would respectfully request that you refrain from making sweeping statements like those contained in your second paragraph.
Regards
Richard Verschoyle
From: aspire-body-cor...@googlegroups.com [mailto:aspire-body-cor...@googlegroups.com] On Behalf Of Pam Burgess
Sent: Friday, 14 November 2014 1:21 PM
To: aspire-body-cor...@googlegroups.com
Subject: RE: Flying Minute - move EGM date to a Saturday
Dear Committee
Richard’s statement below about the business of the EGM is incorrect. An election will also be conducted for a new committee. Surely given the grounds for sacking the committee, those responsible would want to ensure that every owner had the opportunity to attend.
The funny thing is that last year’s nominations were the only legitimate process that Aspire has had for some time, if you consider Cameron’s ineligible election to the committee previously and multiple nominations that I feel sure have occurred not only last year but in the past.
So my vote is yes.
14 Munro St
F: 07 3870 1123