python 3 port

14 views
Skip to first unread message

Chad Whitacre

unread,
Aug 14, 2012, 5:51:25 PM8/14/12
to Daniel Buch, Paul Jimenez, aspen-users
Dan,

I'm personally not a fan of depending on 2to3 or 3to2 at installation
time.  Call it paranoia.  Forking the project is also un-fun.  I much
prefer to maintain a single project that's compatible with 2.6 through
3.2+, which is what I've started to do in my `py3k-compat` branch,
although I'm still getting familiar with the codebase and don't
consider the work to be especially merge-worthy.

Cool. Sounds like we're on the same page. :-)



chad

Daniel Buch

unread,
Aug 14, 2012, 9:38:45 PM8/14/12
to Chad Whitacre, Paul Jimenez, aspen-users
Yay!
Reply all
Reply to author
Forward
0 new messages