Hi Saam,
The 4 points mentioned in my previos reply were the key points and were not the complete list of requirements for the RPS.
Please refer to the rulebook for complete details.
One additional requirement for the RPS is that during an accident, the RPS must prevent significant body contact with the ground - this might be evaluated during the safety inspection of the vehicle in which teams may be asked to invert the vehicle to check if the rider is safe inside the vehicle.
Again, it is recommended to go through the rulebook to check if the proposed design meets all the criterias or not.
It would be difficult to answer a simple yes/no only based on the image provided (because there are other factors at play like how the harness would be attached, would the harness properly fasten down the rider, will the rider be safe if the vehicle is upside down etc)
But assuming if the design fulfills all requirements mentioned in the rulebook, the Halo structure would be considered as a valid RPS design.
Ankur Singh
Chair eHPVC