LJ Thorpe admits Judges bound by the procedural rules

[Shaun O'Connell]

Semi victory on an appeal yesterday.

LJ Thorpe and LJ dyson admitted that Judges cannot go behind the procedural rules even if their reasons are unimpeachable.

hence Judges can only make orders of the Court's own motion by notifying parties in advance of their intention and permitting written and oral submissions if parties disagree with the decision.

Interesting Judicial reviw now been listed for December 18th 2007 at the High Court London.

Two cases one has already been given permission for JR and the other is for permission and JR to follow.

Both deal with the CSA not obeying Tribunal orders for disclosure not once but twice and when the CSA had agreed to disclose.

Tribunal admitted they had no powers to enforce their own orders.


S

--
Please sign and support;

www.un1503petition.com

Destruction of the Family issues

http://www.familieslink.co.uk/

Head Office; Hollibury House, 47B Part St. Southport. Merseyside PR8 1HY
Tel 0870 1657468  Fax 01704 549091.

Hampshire Branch; FLINT Hants. 6, The Towers, Forton rd, Gosport. Hants. PO12 3HA
tel 07719020208

PAS destroys children

http://www.parental-alienation.info/

UK Only non-Govt Law Centre

http//www.elc.org.uk

www.tpuc.org


No safe place for biased judges in Family Law:

http://www.bailii.org/ew/cases/EWCA/Civ/2005/573.html

http://www.bailii.org/ew/cases/EWCA/Civ/2005/759.html

Media reluctant to publish the truth -

http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/main.jhtml?xml=/news/2006/09/14/nlaw114.xml

The biased and time serving;

http://www.fathers.ca/lord_justice_wall.htm

http://www.bailii.org/ew/cases/EWCA/Civ/2006/1199.html