Sent from my BlackBerry® smartphone with SprintSpeed
-----Original Message-----
From: nakon...@gmail.com
Sent: Dec 2, 2008 5:59 PM
To: ascmaintena...@googlegroups.com
Subject: Re: Tractors
I am alright will selling them so long as we don't find ourselves in a bind without the equipment that we need. That's my two cents for the rest of 2008Sent from my BlackBerry® smartphone with SprintSpeed
From: "Christopher Burgan"
Date: Tue, 2 Dec 2008 17:16:05 -0500
To: <ascmaintena...@googlegroups.com>
Subject: Re: Tractors
Hello Everyone,
Sent from my BlackBerry® smartphone with SprintSpeed
Sent from my BlackBerry® smartphone with SprintSpeed
To: <ascmaintena...@googlegroups.com>
Subject: Re: Tractors
Sent from my BlackBerry® smartphone with SprintSpeed
To: <ascmaintena...@googlegroups.com>
Subject: Re: Tractors
Hello all,
I am writing with my thoughts regarding the sale of the tractors.
I am concerned about selling the Simplicity. There are 2 locations at camp that can be cut only by the Simplicity. The first is the Riverfront. The second is the hill from the millennium building down to the road. No other tractors can safely cut those areas.
The riverfront can be cut using the Brush hog. The only problem is that right now, we do not have a tractor capable of operating the brush hog (the Kubota is the only one).
At the last ASC committee meeting, we were authorized to sell the MF and the Kubota and look into purchasing a tractor of similar capabilities (with a hoe and a loader). This type of tractor surely can operate the brush hog, so the riverfront will be able to be cut.
The Millennium building hill is another story. The brush hog cannot be used there, as we need a finishing mower there. None of the other tractors are capable of cutting that hill safely.
The way I see it, if we sell the Simplicity, we are committing to needing 2 new tractors prior to the start of the 2009 season. One to replace the Kubota’s brush hogging capabilities (as well as pulling the hay wagon as previously discussed and approved), and a second grass cutter to replace the Simplicity’s grass cutting on a hill capabilities. If a new zero-turn mower could do the job (I’m not sure, could it be a rollover hazard)? The question becomes, do we really have the money to buy 2 different tractors right now. We will need money for renovations of wash houses, Millennium Bldg bathrooms, commercial washer and dryer...
Also, with a down economy, might see a decrease in camp enrollments. Obviously, it is too soon to tell what our numbers will be in 2009, but I think we might do best to be conservative right now.
The MF is serviceable. The grass cutters are all working. Worst case scenario, If we do not get a new tractor, the only capability we would not have in 2009 is that of pulling the hay wagon. I DO agree with our original plan of selling the Kubota and MF and replacing them with a tractor of similar capabilities (with a back hoe and a loader).
As for selling the auger bit, it is true that we do not use it a lot. However, we do use it. I am not sure that the potential buyer is willing to pay enough for it to compensate us for the inconvenience of not having it. If we need to leave camp once or twice per year to drive somewhere and rent a post driver, those costs will add up over time. If the buyer is looking to buy it for a small sum of money, we would do better just to hold onto it. The implements that we have (the auger bits, brush hog, cement mixer) do not cost us anything but are invaluable when needed.
In summary, I agree with our original plan of selling the Kubota and MF and replacing them with a tractor of similar capabilities (with a back hoe and a loader). At this time, I do not support selling the Simplicity for financial reasons.
Thanks for hearing me out.
Stephen
-----Original Message-----
From: Eric Senedak
Sent: Dec 3, 2008 10:54 AM
To: ascmaintena...@googlegroups.com
Subject: Re: Tractors
Hello everyone,
I agree with Michael that reducing the number of tractors will greatly reduce the cost of maintaining the equipment. I also agree with Hans that this is a perfect forum to discuss any camp related matters quickly and efficiently. The next meeting is in February and I believe that is to far away to wait to discuss these issues. Regarding the Simplicity, I am OK with selling the machine. However, we should price new cutters that could replace it. Chris and I have priced some zero turn cutters recently. We also found out the there is a special discount that we as a not-for-profit would qualify which would dramatically reduce the cost. The retailer that we spoke to said we could possible get a machine for about $500 over the dealer cost.Eric
On Tue, Dec 2, 2008 at 10:45 PM, Hans Harasimchuk <hmhara...@gmail.com> wrote:
Steve,
I agree with Chris' comment about "discussing the selling of the machines at the previous meeting, and having permission to sell , the Kubota and the MF." At the previous meeting You and Chris together were given the power to sell both the Kubota and the MF by the board.
Chris is now asking about the Simplicity? Since the Simplicity was not discussed at the previous meeting, my opinion is this is the perfect place to discuss the selling of the Simplicity. This is a maintenance issue and the maintenance committee has been responding to the emails. Waiting until the next meeting creates the possibility of losing a sale and will only make our long meetings even longer.
Do you think we should sell the Simplicity? How do you feel about the possibility of only having 3 grass cutters next season? I would like to hear your opinion on this matter being you are the one that has used the tractors the most in recent years.
Respectfully,
Hans
On Tue, Dec 2, 2008 at 6:41 PM, All Saints Camp <allsai...@peoplepc.com> wrote:I agree with Michael. I think it is important to meet face to face to discuss this prior to selling any of the equipment.
Hello all,
I am writing with my thoughts regarding the sale of the tractors.
I am concerned about selling the Simplicity. There are 2 locations at camp that can be cut only by the Simplicity. The first is the Riverfront. The second is the hill from the millennium building down to the road. No other tractors can safely cut those areas.
The riverfront can be cut using the Brush hog. The only problem is that right now, we do not have a tractor capable of operating the brush hog (the Kubota is the only one).
At the last ASC committee meeting, we were authorized to sell the MF and the Kubota and look into purchasing a tractor of similar capabilities (with a hoe and a loader). This type of tractor surely can operate the brush hog, so the riverfront will be able to be cut.
The Millennium building hill is another story. The brush hog cannot be used there, as we need a finishing mower there. None of the other tractors are capable of cutting that hill safely.
The way I see it, if we sell the Simplicity, we are committing to needing 2 new tractors prior to the start of the 2009 season. One to replace the Kubota’s brush hogging capabilities (as well as pulling the hay wagon as previously discussed and approved), and a second grass cutter to replace the Simplicity’s grass cutting on a hill capabilities. If a new zero-turn mower could do the job (I’m not sure, could it be a rollover hazard)? The question becomes, do we really have the money to buy 2 different tractors right now. We will need money for renovations of wash houses, Millennium Bldg bathrooms, commercial washer and dryer...
Also, with a down economy, might see a decrease in camp enrollments. Obviously, it is too soon to tell what our numbers will be in 2009, but I think we might do best to be conservative right now.
The MF is serviceable. The grass cutters are all working. Worst case scenario, If we do not get a new tractor, the only capability we would not have in 2009 is that of pulling the hay wagon. I DO agree with our original plan of selling the Kubota and MF and replacing them with a tractor of similar capabilities (with a back hoe and a loader).
As for selling the auger bit, it is true that we do not use it a lot. However, we do use it. I am not sure that the potential buyer is willing to pay enough for it to compensate us for the inconvenience of not having it. If we need to leave camp once or twice per year to drive somewhere and rent a post driver, those costs will add up over time. If the buyer is looking to buy it for a small sum of money, we would do better just to hold onto it. The implements that we have (the auger bits, brush hog, cement mixer) do not cost us anything but are invaluable when needed.
In summary, I agree with our original plan of selling the Kubota and MF and replacing them with a tractor of similar capabilities (with a back hoe and a loader). At this time, I do not support selling the Simplicity for financial reasons.
Thanks for hearing me out.
Stephen
Sent from my BlackBerry® smartphone with SprintSpeed
To: <ascmaintena...@googlegroups.com>
Subject: Re: Tractors