as3-signals

If you want to use NativeTouch Event you should replace classes by attachments

Example Usage package { import events.signal.StarlingSignalSet; import starling.display.Sprite;

Or You can use NativeSignalSet clicked = new NativeSignalSet(view); clicked.getNativeSignal(

Thanks for your answer Neil. After a couple of search, I found that there is no Async delaying, so

In case GC garbage collected the listener, how would a Stackoverflow error happen. A stack should be

hi!, I wanted to ask if Signal supports binding ? I wanna use binding in Flash ( not flex ) , ie.

I read somewhere, that i can use binding via signals. There are some examples i found ( http://www.

Is there a separate mailing list for discussing as3-signals-utilities-async? Chris On Friday, 19

I don't think that you have to think of it as an Events OR Signals decision I weigh up the

Have a play and see what the results are ;-) On 24 Jun 2011, at 20:28, Zachary Pierce wrote:

http://flashongames.com - RSVP On June 21st. I am using as3 sockets for a composition framework and

Sometimes I do need a signal been dispatched and a boolean property to mark something has happened.

Your sending class would have the signal as a public property. Then in your responding class, you

Thanks, Hans. I took your advice, and am exploring, for the first time, the world of frameworks. It

Even you were sending a huge Array, you're only sending the reference through the Signal. "

Hi all, Luckily I've had some free time to implement some of the features that Robert has had in

I was reading this[1] and thought it would be a lot more powerful to return the binding rather than

I'm very sorry that I was attacked of virus or something to send you a spam message. I've

1) Signals with changes is pretty much backwards compatible. 2) Do not use it if you are happy with

Jay, In my tests of 1 listener, function.apply was faster then the switch statement optimization. I

Completely agree with Robert I had this exact conversation with a peer recently and it's the

Yes, the interfaces can be changed. Start threads! Discuss! On Wed, Feb 2, 2011 at 8:24 AM, Tyler

I think my tests were with a single listener - switch vs always function.apply. It makes sense that

Hi All, First let me thank you for this wonderful framework that make the code lot cleaner. I have

You can create as many or as few signals as you need, with 0 to many value objects dispatched. For

There's always more than one way, but you could extend GenericEvent and have your custom

You could use the numListeners property. Ie if (downSignal.numListeners > 0) ... Ben On 29/11/2010

I've got a similar issue .. after #removeAll call and a "re"-#add imy listener stops

i dont have a solution your "remove-issue", but just want to mention that you could use #

Yes :) On Oct 21, 6:04 pm, Robert Penner <robertpen...@gmail.com> wrote: > Are you wanting