The following functions can be used to determine the current operating system version or identify whether it is a Windows or Windows Server release. These functions provide simple tests that use the VerifyVersionInfo function and the recommended greater than or equal to comparisons that are proven as a robust means to determine the operating system version.
These APIs are defined by versionhelpers.h, which is included in the Windows Software Development Kit (SDK) for Windows 8.1 and later. This file can be used with other Microsoft Visual Studio releases to implement the same functionality for Windows versions prior to Windows 8.1.
The inline functions defined in the VersionHelpers.h header file let you verify the operating system version by returning a Boolean value when testing for a version of Windows.
I have a project where I have a need to break the version number down and access it's component pieces when building a manifest file. After doing some searching around I found the build-helper-maven-plugin and figured my problem was solved. I added the plugin to the master POM, it's shown below.
So the incremental version appears to be correct, although I'm not all that confident given that the major version isn't correct, it found no minor version, and the qualifier comes back as the entire version number, rather than just the SNAPSHOT piece i had expected. I can see where a build number of zero would be correct since we don't have what Maven considers a build number.
When are you inspecting the property values? Ensure you're doing it after the validate phase in your example, or if you want it on the same phase ensure the build-helper-maven-plugin occurs before the plugin you're using to inspect the property values. If I have this:
Parse a version string and set properties containing the component parts of the version. This mojo sets the following properties: [propertyPrefix].majorVersion [propertyPrefix].minorVersion [propertyPrefix].incrementalVersion [propertyPrefix].qualifier [propertyPrefix].buildNumber Where the propertyPrefix is the string set in the mojo parameter. The parsing of the above is based on the following format of the version: . . - It will be tried to parse the version as an OSGi version. It this is successful the following property will be set accordingly. If this is not possible a warning will be emitted. [propertyPrefix].osgiVersion This goal also sets the following properties: [propertyPrefix].nextMajorVersion [propertyPrefix].nextMinorVersion [propertyPrefix].nextIncrementalVersion [propertyPrefix].nextBuildNumber This goal also sets the following properties: [formattedPropertyPrefix].majorVersion [formattedPropertyPrefix].minorVersion [formattedPropertyPrefix].incrementalVersion [formattedPropertyPrefix].buildNumber This goal also sets the following properties: [formattedPropertyPrefix].nextMajorVersion [formattedPropertyPrefix].nextMinorVersion [formattedPropertyPrefix].nextIncrementalVersion [formattedPropertyPrefix].nextBuildNumber There is another property set which is named [propertyPrefix].qualifier and furthermore another property which is named [propertyPrefix].qualifier? which contains a prefix - if the qualifier contains anything otherwise the whole property is simply empty. mvn build-helper:parse-version versions:set \ -DnewVersion=\$parsedVersion.majorVersion.\$parsedVersion.nextMinorVersion.\$parsedVersion.incrementalVersion\$parsedVersion.qualifier? The above properties contain simply incremented versions of the parsed version informations. Those can now be used to update the version of your project via the following to the next Major version: mvn build-helper:parse-version versions:set \ -DnewVersion=\$parsedVersion.nextMajorVersion.0.0 \ versions:commit It can of course being used to increment the minor version: mvn build-helper:parse-version versions:set \ -DnewVersion=\$parsedVersion.majorVersion.\$parsedVersion.nextMinorVersion.0 \ versions:commit This can make an upgrade of the versions of your project very convenient.
I installed - v 10.4.4 build 458403 public Editor: v112.1.14477 Service: v1.23.6 on my Mac and now have Evernote Helper (Render) popping to the top of the Activity monitor often with 100%+ CPU usage. This is new and effecting performance. Can this be improved?
It does not seem to be directly related to activity in Evernote at the time. Just some background task gone a bit hoggish. Not always flat out but often enough to be very noticeable and impact the machine.
After a few days seeing that this newer version of Evernote for Mac v 10.5.7 build 458420 is better but can still nail a process when just on-screen. It's not being interacted with just sitting there but one of the Evernote Helper (Renderer) eats 80% of a cpu.
Am Was having similar performance. I do have quite a few notes (5000) and am seeing quite a bit of CPU usage and the corresponding reduction in how long my MacBook Pro 13 can run on battery -- to me this is a critical issue. Perhaps optimization will help this soon.
After a second restart after the 10.5.7 upgrade, CPU usage dropped substantially. Perhaps, there is an issue between the Helper(s) and the main Evernote when software upgrades happen since they seem to be happening within the main application.
It seems to have gone away after i did this: (1) Completely removed Evernote using AppCleaner (2) Rebooted (3) Revoked access for my Mac from my Evernote account page (4) Downloaded Evernote from their website, and NOT from the App Store (5) Installed, logged in and left it to download my entire set of notes without interruption (by disabling sleep). This took a few hours.
However, it appears that Evernote will be forcing users off the legacy client at the end of March so I was curious if anyone has solved / mitigated these performance issues on the Mac so that the new version is usable.
Update. Without knowing if a new Mac was the answer, I went ahead and purchased a new machine about 3 months ago. This was the answer for me. After several weeks, Evernote is performing MUCH better than it was previously. Appreciate all of the thoughtful advice, everyone!
But the main issue is that on a new Mac, you have a new EN install with a new, smooth database. Most cases of high CPU usage are caused by a local data corruption. It causes the app into a loop, consuming computing power without getting anywhere. This can be healed by purging the current install, using the app AppCleaner (Mac). Then a restart and a fresh install of EN brings back the good performance.
Thanks, Pink. You may be right in most cases. However, purging the install and various other troubleshooting with EN staff over the course of several months didn't work for me. Regardless, it was time for a new machine, and all is working great now. Thanks again, everyone!
Just to compare: This is the EN Mac client open on a base MacMini M1, with the app being open and idle in the background. Hardly a reason to hold my breath, or to keep the app closed because it would consume too much of anything. All positions including the Web Clipper (which is a standalone browser extension) and the browser tab add up to just 1.3% of CPU while idle.
One of the best things that I did this year for my cooking practice, if you will, was embarking on a journey to make the perfect homemade version of Hamburger Helper. As I'm typing this out, I recognize how ridiculous it sounds, but to borrow and bastardize a line from the "Royal Tenenbaums," immediately after making this statement, I realized that it was true.
It took a few months, and a few more dirtied pots, but the process was absolutely worth it. Like many folks, the last two years have brought a lot of cooking from home. There were times that I actively leaned into that new normal, perfecting my challah braiding and growing a scallion on my windowsill along with the rest of the country. Then, there were times when I couldn't shake the feelings of fatigue that ulderlied seemingly simple tasks, like shopping for groceries or making dinner.
Almost without thinking, I took a few steps to the left and grabbed a box of Hamburger Helper from the shelves. I ducked over to the meat counter for a pound of ground beef and suddenly I had a complete dinner in my basket. I probably hadn't made Hamburger Helper since college, but that night, it seemed exceptionally good. I mean, it hits all the right "comfort food" notes, without being particularly nuanced. It's cheesy and creamy with just a little pep from the dehydrated vegetables and spices.
I noted that anything with an asterisk next to it was dried, and the process felt a little bit like the start of one of pastry chef Claire Saffitz's "Gourmet Makes" videos, which she used to produce through Bon Appetit. In each episode, Saffitz would be tasked with recreating a well-known junk or comfort food, ranging from Ruffles potato chips to Girl Scout cookies.
c80f0f1006