Re: Srimad Bhagavat Gita Study Group Digest for arsha-vidya-gita@googlegroups.com - 1 Message in 1 Topic

24 views
Skip to first unread message

DR. PRASAD BULUSU

unread,
Apr 24, 2012, 6:07:20 AM4/24/12
to arsha-vi...@googlegroups.com
really  very  nice  introduction  ,  sir  !   I  quote  you  !                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                   "  The  conclusion  I  have  about  myself   is  wrong  !
This  is   precisely  what  Vedanta  says. " ----                                                                   " There  is  a   solution  !                                                                                              And  it   is  in   the  form   of   Knowledge  of   my  True  Nature ."                                                                                                                                                                             to  Know  that  I  am  Poorn'a  Purusha  ! !                                                                                                                                              dr. prasad.

--- On Tue, 4/24/12, arsha-vi...@googlegroups.com <arsha-vi...@googlegroups.com> wrote:

From: arsha-vi...@googlegroups.com <arsha-vi...@googlegroups.com>
Subject: Srimad Bhagavat Gita Study Group Digest for arsha-vi...@googlegroups.com - 1 Message in 1 Topic
To: "Digest Recipients" <arsha-vi...@googlegroups.com>
Date: Tuesday, April 24, 2012, 4:32 AM

Group: http://groups.google.com/group/arsha-vidya-gita/topics

    Paritala Gopi Krishna <paritalag...@gmail.com> Apr 23 04:33AM -0700  

    Dear Fellow Seekers,
    Love and Love alone ....
    I am sending herewith the first post -- Introduction on Vedanta -- from Sri
    Santatmananda, as a prelude to Srimad Bhagavad Gita postings. This may take
    a few posts from today onwards. Kindly go through leisurely and intently to
    grasp the essence of the philosophy, before we embark on learning and
    appreciting the depth of SBG.
    Love and Love alone ....
    P. Gopi Krishna
    ====

    Knowledge is the easiest thing to be obtained. It involves no operation or
    action on its part. It is as true as the object, as real as the means is.
     
    The Fundamental problem
     
    What is it that I am really seeking through my various pursuits in life?
    What do I seek when I pursue money, pleasures, fame, name, power or heaven?
    Do I seek all these for the sake of themselves? If it were just for
    themselves, I would be satisfied when I fulfilled any given desire.
    However, I am only momentarily satisfied when I fulfill them. Soon I find
    myself with other set of desires. This way the desires I entertain may
    change in nature and in time. But one thing remains constant, in spite of
    all accomplishments I may have, me the unsatisfied and inadequate person,
    the person who would like to become somebody different from what I am at
    present. Why? Because I am conscious of myself and as a result of my
    relating with the world, I have a judgment about myself. My conclusion
    about myself is that I am limited, mortal, subject to sorrow.
     
    I cannot accept myself as I am and therefore make attempts throughout my
    life to be acceptable to myself by pursuing different things. However, if I
    am an individual confined to this limited body, with limited powers to
    change situations, things and people in this vast universe, it seems
    impossible that I will one day become totally acceptable to myself and find
    a lasting fulfillment that does not depend upon any situation, any given
    place or time.
     
    This preliminary inquiry into the nature of my pursuits leads me to the
    fact that there is no connection between what I want and what I do: I want
    to be free from being a wanting, limited, insignificant person. And my
    different pursuits in life have only the capacity to give me a temporary
    relief, in the form of momentary satisfaction and joy.
     
    At this point, some will say, this is the reality of existence. Life is
    meaningless, you are a limited entity confronted with the immense forces of
    the world and you have to accept this fact of existence. You can give a
    meaning to it by your actions: just be an ethical person and try to excel
    in what you do, whether you are in business, arts, science or working in a
    company, contribute to the society as much as you can, but do not expect
    anything more than this from life. And do not forget to enjoy the small and
    big pleasures of life! But how can I accept this kind of reality and
    dismiss this intense aspiration for freedom from fear and sorrow, this
    fundamental search for everlasting fulfillment that seems to be at the core
    of my being?
     
    Others will say, there is a heaven where you will enjoy eternally some
    special pleasures, provided that you behave well and follow the
    commandments of our scripture. But how can limited prayers and good actions
    that I do in this life produce an eternal stay in heaven? Since any limited
    action cannot produce a limitless result, eternal stay in heaven cannot be
    acceptable to my reason.
     
    Then the only possibility is that maybe
the conclusion I have abo
    ut myself
    is wrong. This is precisely what Vedanta says. It says that you are already
    what you are looking for, the limitless, the whole, you are already free
    from this sense of limitation, insecurity and lack. Logically, this seems
    to be the only solution: because if I am really a limited individual, no
    matter what I do, no action will ever produce the limitless I am seeking .
    But if I am making a mistake about myself, and taking myself to be limited
    while I am in reality limitless, there is a solution! And it is in the form
    of knowledge of my true nature . This seems to be the only way out !
     
    It is interesting that most religions, philosophies, psychologies, etc. do
    not attempt to question this fundamental and universal conclusion that
    everyone has, 'I am a limited individual'. Often they confirm the
    conclusion about the limited nature of I and start their system of beliefs,
    school of thought or therapy with this in-built assumption. Keeping this
    paradigm, whatever solution they envisage, it can never solve my problem of
    being a limited individual.
     
    Since Vedanta addresses the most fundamental problem that is universally
    faced by everyone, any discerning person will examine what Vedanta has to
    say about ones true nature.

     

You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Group arsha-vidya-gita.
You can post via email.
To unsubscribe from this group, send an empty message.
For more options, visit this group.

DR. PRASAD BULUSU

unread,
Apr 26, 2012, 5:16:15 AM4/26/12
to arsha-vi...@googlegroups.com
                  Resp.   Sir  ,                                                                                                                                                                                                                                       Very  good  introduction  to  :                                                                                                                                           ( i )  knowledge  acquired  through  the  senses                                                                                                                                           ( ii )  knowledge  that  aims  at  knowing  the  Knower   &                                                                                                                                            ( iii )  nature  of  "  I  "   which  is  neither  unknown  --  nor  fully  known  ;                                                                                                                                     very  apt  &  perfect  that  you  have  written  !                                                                                                                                                                                                                   let  me  recall  the  words  of  our  Scriptures  :                                                                                                                                    Katha  Upanishad  says  :  paraanchi  khaani  vyatr.n'at  svayambhuh  tasmaat  paraan^  pas'yati  na  antaraatman  :  sense  organs  are  made  in  such  a  manner  that  they  can  know  the  external  objects  only  ;  they  fail  to  know  the  Inner  Essence  !                                                                                                                                                  Br.hadaaran'yaka  Upanishad  inquires  :  vijxaataaram  are'  ke'na  vijaaneeyaat  ?   how  to  know  the  Knower  ?  certainly  not  through  the  senses  !                                                                                                                                    Mund'aka  Upanishad  says  :  tat  doore'  tadvantike'  cha   :  It  (  the  Inner  Essence  ,  the  Knower  )   is   both   far   and  near  ,  known  &  unknown  !                                                                                                                                         &  also  says  :  anyame'va  tad  viditaat  ,  tatho  aviditaat  adhi  :  It  (  the  Inner  Essence  ,  the  Knower  )  is   different   from  the  known  sense-objects  &  is  certainly   higher   than   the  unknown  i.e.,  It   does   not   fall   in   the   purview   of  the   sense-objects  ;  It   should   be   known  through  an  entirely  different  ,  higher  method  !                                                                                                                                                 
                                     Kr.shn'am  Vande'  Jagadgurum  !                                                                                                                                                                                       dr. prasad.

                                                                                                                                          --- On Thu, 4/26/12, arsha-vi...@googlegroups.com <arsha-vi...@googlegroups.com> wrote:

From: arsha-vi...@googlegroups.com <arsha-vi...@googlegroups.com>
Subject: Srimad Bhagavat Gita Study Group Digest for arsha-vi...@googlegroups.com - 1 Message in 1 Topic
To: "Digest Recipients" <arsha-vi...@googlegroups.com>
Date: Thursday, April 26, 2012, 3:57 AM

    Paritala Gopi Krishna <paritalag...@gmail.com> Apr 25 09:25PM -0700  

    Vedanta is a means of knowledge
     
    Vedanta claims that the conclusions that I have about myself are wrong and
    I am here and now the fullness I am seeking through all my life pursuits.
    How can I know what is the real nature of myself?
     
    What are the means that I have at my disposal to know things in this world?
    Perception and inference. Perception is the basic means at my disposal and
    can be divided into seeing, hearing, sense of smell, taste and touch.
    Through my eyes, I can have access to the sphere of the colors and forms.
    With my ears, the sphere of sounds, with my nose, to the different odors,
    and so on. These basic means can be enhanced through various instruments.
    For example, a telescope to enable me to know a remote star located at
    several light years away from me or a microscope to know the structure of
    the HIV virus, to which I can have no access with my naked eyes. With
    inference and deductive reasoning, which also draw their data from
    perception, I am able to gather knowledge about what constitutes the domain
    of science and all disciplines of knowledge, from medicine to chemistry,
    and computer science to quantum physics.
     
    Then what about the knowledge about this I, myself, the subject? Are these
    means of knowledge of any use to me to know myself? No, because I, the
    knower is employing these different means of knowledge to know what is
    different from me, what is an object separate from me the subject who knows
    them. They are therefore inadequate to give me access into myself.
     
    One can ask a question, is not psychology the adequate means to acquire
    knowledge about myself? No, because psychology also draws its data from
    perception, and builds its different theories and therapies with the help
    of different forms of reasoning. The knower uses a specific form of
    perception called witness perception to observe and know his/her emotions,
    thoughts, dreams, etc. and their influence on one’s behavior. The existence
    of unconscious and its dynamics is arrived through these observations and
    inference drawn from the observations.
     
    The sphere of operation of perception, inference, etc. is therefore
    restricted to what can be objectified by me, the knower. How can I have
    knowledge about myself, the knower himself? I need an appropriate means of
    knowledge. Vedanta presents itself as an independent means of knowledge in
    the form of words that reveals the true nature of I . Words of Vedanta no
    doubt need perception (my ears to be heard). On the other hand, words can
    be used to communicate or describe objects or concepts that are known
    through perception and inference. Here, we are talking about Vedanta as a
    means of knowledge in the form of words which like a mirror can make me see
    the nature of myself by looking into their meaning. Vedanta says also that
    the nature of myself cannot be arrived at by other means of knowledge like
    perception or inference, because "I" can never be objectified.
     
    If Vedanta is a means of knowledge, like any other means of knowledge, it
    must reveal things that cannot be known through other means of knowledge.
    For example, what eyes can reveal, ears have no access to. Second, being a
    means of knowledge, what it says must also not be contradicted by any other
    means of knowledge. If any piece of knowledge can be contradicted by
    another, then it is not valid anymore as it can be negated, like in science
    any theory is held to be right until somebody contradicts it. If what
    Vedanta says is true, then it can be tested against any contention or
    theory or philosophy. Vedanta does not ask us to believe in what it says.
    It is only asking us to see what it reveals until we have any reason which
    disproves what it says. That means any doubts that we have, Vedanta refutes
    them by using logic and showing their untenability. This way, Vedanta poses
    the most incredible challenge that human reasoning can be confronted to.
     
    Further, since Vedanta reveals the true nature of I, which is not something
    away from me in time and space, it gives me direct knowledge. If an object
    is a way from me in time and space, words can give me only indirect
    knowledge like an animal unknown to me or even heaven. For example, the
    existence of heaven is a non-verifiable belief for me and I have no way
    either to prove or to disprove in this life its existence or my going to
    it. I will have to wait for the after-life if there is one! Unlike this
    type of indirect knowledge, Vedanta speaks about I that is neither totally
    unknown nor it is fully known to me even though it is not clearly known at
    the same time. I know perfectly that I am, without using my perception or
    inference. That means I don't need any means of knowledge to know that I
    am. Therefore, I am self-evident. However, the precise nature of I is not
    clear. Vedanta is a means of knowledge to know true nature of I. Since I am
    always present, words of Vedanta give direct knowledge that can be verified
    by me.

     

Reply all
Reply to author
Forward
0 new messages