Hi Daniel,
The Nonprofit Open Data Collective held a meeting on January 11th (hosted by Cinthia Schuman at the Aspen Institute) on precisely this issue. The group brought together academics, practitioners, and (former) government staff to discuss the questions that you outlined below. Please find below a summary of the discussion:
Together, we essentially decided on a two-pronged strategy.
As you can tell, there were no answers as much as a refining of some questions and needs to overcome the challenges with accessing 990 data that the situation brings to light.
It seems like the .ZIP approach will be what they do moving forward, but I’m not 100%. Happy to chat further, via email, this listserv, or one-on-one!
-Francisco
Francisco J. Santamarina
(he/his/him)
PhD Candidate
Evans School of Public Policy & Governance | University of Washington
360-836-0731 | Seattle, WA 98195 | website
fjsa...@uw.edu
The University of Washington acknowledges the Coast Salish peoples of this land, the land which touches the shared waters of all tribes and bands within the Duwamish, Puyallup, Suquamish, Tulalip and Muckleshoot
nations. To learn more, visit
Native-Land.ca.
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "ARNOVA Data and Analytics Section" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to
arnovadataci...@googlegroups.com.
To view this discussion on the web visit
https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/arnovadatacig/d7fef395-1130-4f28-85a6-efa2db1a51den%40googlegroups.com.
To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/arnovadatacig/CO1PR08MB6982871F533C7CE73F5DAECAAA279%40CO1PR08MB6982.namprd08.prod.outlook.com.
Hi Daniel,
Glad to be of service 😊.
-Francisco
Francisco J. Santamarina
(he/his/him)
PhD Candidate
Evans School of Public Policy & Governance | University of Washington
360-836-0731 | Seattle, WA 98195 | website
fjsa...@uw.edu
The University of Washington acknowledges the Coast Salish peoples of this land, the land which touches the shared waters of all tribes and bands within the Duwamish, Puyallup, Suquamish, Tulalip and Muckleshoot
nations. To learn more, visit
Native-Land.ca.
From: arnova...@googlegroups.com <arnova...@googlegroups.com>
On Behalf Of Daniel Fonner
Sent: Wednesday, February 2, 2022 12:39 PM
To: arnova...@googlegroups.com
Subject: Re: [ARNOVA Data and Analytics CIG] 990 XML data moving forward as IRS moves data off AWS
Thank you so much Francisco! This is really helpful. I completely missed the Nonprofit Open Data Collective meeting; I'm really glad the conversations are going on!
All the best,
Daniel
On Wed, Feb 2, 2022 at 1:59 PM Francisco J Santamarina <fjsa...@uw.edu> wrote:
Hi Daniel,
The Nonprofit Open Data Collective held a meeting on January 11th (hosted by Cinthia Schuman at the Aspen Institute) on precisely this issue. The group brought together academics, practitioners, and (former) government staff to discuss the questions that you outlined below. Please find below a summary of the discussion:
Together, we essentially decided on a two-pronged strategy.
1. We, as a community, should work together to ensure more accessible, “normalized” 990 data. We know that the IRS EO division is understaffed, and the agency is plagued by major delays. While we learned from Andrea Suozzo that the agency plans to take at least one step - providing indices - to improve access to the bulk 990 e-filed data being released to the IRS website, we do not know when such improvements will happen. Open 990 data is a common good, and by collaborating on various pieces of this puzzle, we can jumpstart the process of upgrading the 990 “ecosystem.” Many good ideas for working together were provided, including jointly creating a “bucket” from which individuals can gain access to 990 files more easily; creating a coding competition to accelerate production of the 990 data “pipeline”; and continuing to jointly tackle the missing 990 schema, that are so essential.
2. Advocacy and communication with the IRS must continue. In addition to our regular comments to the IRS, we should reach out to individuals, both within and outside the IRS, to ensure that our recommendations are heard, and the spirit of the Taxpayer First Act’s transparency provisions is realized. It was noted that officials within the Statistics of Income division of the IRS are natural allies and are open to learning what is needed to further research. In addition, there are future legislative opportunities, and we should work with our partners at Independent Sector and elsewhere, to express and underscore our policy concerns.
To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/arnovadatacig/CAAw-8x0wAxrii%3DGgVR9MBdRSrS1f7%2BozJyPCpin_GBGSThVycg%40mail.gmail.com.