Sameissue. I bought 3 roams, 2 of them were down to 70% when I woke up and I hardly used those yesterday other than for 5 mins or so. The other one was down to 35%!! Having been used for about 45 mins and then on standby from lunchtime till this morning
If the battery life of Roam does not seem acceptable and you have Google Assistant installed on it, please try removing Google Assistant - we are aware of an issue whereby Google Assistant can use a disproportionate amount of power on the Roam, and we are currently working on a resolution which will be available in a future software update. Thanks.
I fully charged my Roam upon receipt on Tuesday then switched it off. I did not install an assistant and truplay is switched off. I switched it on 4 days later to find the battery at 47%. After 5 minutes of play it had dropped to 43%. Unacceptable.
Charged the Roam to 100% before going to bed. Slept 8 hours; Roam was turned off. This morning Roam battery is at 39%. This is useless. I could not even fly or drive to a holiday destination without the battery being gone.
I had this same issue and contacted both sonos support and the company i purchased it from. No reply from sonos support and my retailer let me return it. My roam was going down to 35% without even using it. I even removed google assistant which did not make any difference. I had high hopes for this device, but it did not meet my expectations.
This is pretty cool and almost exactly what I needed. As soon as I started using org-roam (which is just a few hours ago) I felt grasping for something like this. Thank you for this snippet. I see how this can be improved:
Please refer below two article explain how to configure smart roam on the SZ and what's the sticky client behavior. I would also suggest not to set the value too aggressively but start with a lower side.
Although the newer smartroam+ algorithm does use 802.11v to gently steer first, it still will use kicking (disconnecting) of clients which may have other side effects, from brief interruption of WiFi all the way to blacklisting an AP for several hours.
Hi , I have been using Roam a lot lately and its replaced notion as my default tool.
And i started trying remnotes too - i was blown away by its integration with spaced revision and how good it integrates with reading books since you can make notes of your pdf/epub highlights - add your insights to them and make flashcards from them.
This makes me feel confused if i should stick to roam or remnotes as my default tool because of the enormous benefits in compounding of keeping all your thoughts at one place (second brain like effects). At the moment remnotes look like a more useful product,however with the vast funding and fan base once roam opens up its api i dont know were things will be 3 years from now? I
However, most of these tools (if not all) use Markdown, which means the notes you create are agnostic to any app. In other words, you can export from one app and import to another. So no matter which app is around in three years, your Markdown files will work with it.
Personally I am a student,and I read a lot of non academic self help book PDFs too,So I felt roam would be great long term to shift there.Also since I started using roam I have a lot of interconnected insights about my life but I loose track of them which I am hoping remnotes can solve.
This thread explains which features stand out in RemNote, and they are not just features mostly, they are core philosophies, as features can easily be built over any tools and hence pales as a comparison point. We have to choose tools based on their vision, philosophy and architecture.
The status for now is that few of my mates having bolt v2, roam including mine bolt v1 lost feature of planned workout sync. Hopefully Wahoo would turn it on again, but currenly third party files are not able to be used.
Importing ERG files in the way you have described is not currently supported, so you may experience issues importing files in this way. I apologise for this inconvenience. We are always looking to improve our products and will work to expand planned workout integration in future. Future improvements to this will come via firmware update,
For that, I chose the Cape Wrath Trail, a muddy, unmarked route stretching about 200 miles. It runs generally between Fort William in the south and the Cape Wrath lighthouse on the northwest coast. I zeroed in on what looked like a particularly wild section from Inverie to Glenfinnan.
The first mile followed a well-established trail along the Inverie River. I walked past stone walls growing poofs of moss. The forest floor crept up tree trunks, swaddling them in greenery. A dome of clouds occasionally opened up, allowing the sun to brighten the brooding moors.
In 1999, after a referendum, the Scottish Parliament was reestablished for the first time since 1707, which meant that Scotland could pass its own land reforms. Just four years later, the Land Reform (Scotland) Act, or LRSA, opened up the whole countryside.
Earlier, in Inverie, I met two outdoor management professionals at the offices of the Knoydart Foundation, which is managed by the 100 community members who collectively own the 17,200-acre Knoydart Estate. (Community ownership of land is becoming increasingly common in Scotland.) I spoke with Amie Dow, the estate ranger, and her husband Ian, the estate forester, about the challenges the right to roam presents.
After my night camping outside the bothy, I continued on, hiking up a path that ran alongside the Finiskaig River. Here, the glen contained broad sweeps of grass and moss webbed with streams. Waterfalls gushed from the mountainsides.
We hung our clothes to dry by the fire, then laid in our sleeping bags on an elevated platform, the fire crackling and popping a few feet away. I asked her about the differences between hiking in the U.S. and Scotland.
I had plenty of time to think about these things because when I arrived in Glenfinnan, where my journey was supposed to end, I decided to keep going. I had enough food and a flexible schedule, and the rain had even paused. So in the spirit of roaming, I tacked on another 20 miles of the Cape Wrath Trail.
Backed by 20 years of science and engagement with local communities, Room to Roam is securing and connecting habitats, creating safe passages for wildlife to travel freely through their home ranges in East and southern Africa. The positive outcomes of this far-reaching initiative will be greater biodiversity, natural resilience to climate change, and a future where animals and people can coexist and thrive.
Because of the critical role elephants play as ecosystem engineers, protecting them and the landscapes in which they roam indirectly protects the other wildlife and plants sharing their habitats and, ultimately, helps to mitigate climate change.
To thrive, wild animals need safe routes to move freely through countries, over borders, and at a distance from humans. They need access to healthy habitats for food, water, and natural space to stabilise and succeed. Connecting habitats is critical. When habitats are connected and wild animals can roam freely across their landscapes, populations become resilient to changes in their environments and extreme climatic variations, which ultimately buffers species against the threat of extinction. Likewise, communities become more resilient.
So after 5 years or so of our full stack Meraki implementation complaints in a particular area of our building are ever more increasing. We have users who are sat working happily on 5 bars of signal strength connected to their local AP and then for no apparent reason they will then Roam over to an AP on the floor above or one at the other end of the building and the speed/connection will be so bad they'll either have 1 bar shown or it will show the globe icon "no internet".
So a bit of back ground - Office Building is 3 floors and about 50m x 20m
We have 3 AP's on Ground floor, 6 AP's on 1t floor (as it's sectioned off in to wards) 3 AP's on top Floor
The issues are with the people who work on the 1st floor (most AP's). I'm starting to consider we have too many AP's in that space but what is annoying most is why they are picking up AP's on the floor above or below when there is a thick concrete layer between them. Why would they do this?
I almost wish i could tell certain clients they are only allowed to connect to certain AP's which you can't quite do albeit fudge some ssid availability and create a new SSID which i don't want to do.
I'm using basic indoor radio profiles but I did turn on the Auto RF AI radio feature but i'm not sure it has helped. Does this override the RF profiles?
See below a user that is having massive issues and is more or less sat in between 2 AP's (W4 & W3)
Also, those APs use a RF profile in which the 5GHz band is set for max tx power of 10 dBm and a min bitrate of 24 Mbps. That's going to create really small RF cells. In a super high density environment that might be acceptable. But it's not a config I would expect to see in most routine office deployments.
All of the RSSIs in your screenshot aren't great which leads me to believe the clients are either pretty far from the APs or due to your RF profile 5GHz setting and the really small RF cells those are the best they get. Wireless clients are what make the decision to roam and if the clients sees all the APs at low & similar RSSIs it could lead to the client attempting to roam more often in search of a better signal.
3a8082e126