Re: Flowthrough in Operation Statement
28 views
Skip to first unread message
Message has been deleted
Austin Matherne
Nov 13, 2025, 3:51:00 PMNov 13
to Arelle-users
Hi,
There's a hint in the log:
> [info] In "Condensed Statements of Operations (Unaudited)", column(s) 4(c40), 5(c30), 9(c73), 10(c63) are contained in other reports, so were removed by flow through suppression. - tlgwf-20250930.htm
There's a hint in the log:
> [info] In "Condensed Statements of Operations (Unaudited)", column(s) 4(c40), 5(c30), 9(c73), 10(c63) are contained in other reports, so were removed by flow through suppression. - tlgwf-20250930.htm
You can read more about flow through suppression in the SEC's EDGAR XBRL Guide, section 7.11 Flow Through Suppression on Statements.
Kind regards,
Austin Matherne
On Thursday, November 13, 2025 at 4:25:32 AM UTC-5 santhos...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi Austin,
We are getting traditional rendering differences for the operation statement in two different iXBRL zip files. Herewith attached is the iXBRL zip file for your reference. We have cross-verified both files; there are no differences.
Kindly check and provide the solutions controlling flowthrough in Operation statement.
CompSci Rendering:BX Rendering:
Reply all
Reply to author
Forward
0 new messages