On 06/21/2014 11:30 AM, Dale Lanan wrote:
> You are wrong about the Venus effect. Moon's gravity may accelerate
> breakdown of Lithosphere into the higher temp below due to mixing and
> the likelihood of a continuous temperature inversion in Lower
> atmosphere to 50 kilometers. The degassing of oceans to vapor will
> force a moist even..
> Life frosting on Earth surface will be assimilated.
> Some think this political and say global warming is off topic on some
> internet threads. Extinction hangs like by thread now broken that held
> sword.. Formerly I thought words could get people to move but I think
> they like work even harder at what keeps them from moving by hold of
> debt slave monetary. Vultures are rewarded, assets made of parts of
> Earth's former whole, Open Systems of Nature are now undercut of
> understory; it is eliminated now to the point of collapse in an heating..
>
Polite discourse appreciated Dale. But the thing about the moon, was
that Venus didnt have one, so we cant apply the same progression, at
least without factoring that in. Of course, there may yet be other
unrecognized factors affecting the feedbacks that produce the Venus
syndrome. For instance, Arctic News reported on the increase of
earthquakes. We know these trigger volcanism, and the geologic record is
full of dramatic climate cooling as a result.
Venus didnt have the ice either, nor the shift in location of mass as it
melts, which in turn triggers subsidence & uplift. And more volcanoes.
Its not that the Venus syndrome cannot happen, but that we cant assume
it to be the default.
But agreed, the idea that "words could get people to move" is
delusional. I expect we agree also that the Vultures are driving the
whole world in a race to the bottom. The lack of rain in California has
gotten lotsa feedback, but everyone ignores the ongoing good news of
rain on the Great Plains. So far good; but grain needs dry weather to
harvest. My barley is showing signs of ergot. Along with extinction, we
may see massive explosions as life forms adapt to new opportunity.
The upshot is there's no way to tell; the bunker in the boonies does not
look adequate any more. what will be needed is the ability to evaluate
conditions as they unfold and have the mobility to develop whatever set
of resources will be available among the best locations. A return to
seasonal migrations should also be evaluated. Words wont, but unfamiliar
weather "could get people to move", in which case the means and
destinations will be listened to. So, what are those means and destinations?