Hi Kyle-
Do you know if there is any other way to import tha auto-calibration
results into the SWAT model? I have used the Manual Calibration tool,
and everything went smoothly, except that the results were not
anywhere close as to what the auto-calibration said it should be. A
few particular concerns is that Blai and Slope were auto-calibrated,
but Blai is not even an option in the manual calibration, and then I
cannot locate Slope in the input files (it is in the manual
calibration tool, but I like to double check that the input files are
updated. Is Slope the same as HRU_SLP in .hru perhaps?)
Another question, is that if the auto-calibration results are for
example, -25.00 (with an IMet of 3), when you use the manual
calibration tool, do you multiply by 0.75? This seems logical to me,
but like I said, my results are terrible using the auto-calibrated
output, so maybe I am doing it wrong?
Please let me know if you have any suggestions to make this process
run more smoothly- thanks!
/Courtney
On 22 Apr, 20:08, Kyle <
kglazew...@undeerc.org> wrote:
> Eben,
> The CN2 values are located in your MGT1 table within your project
> file. You can change it in Access or you can use the ManualCalibrationTool that is under the SWAT Simulation dropdown.
>
> When you set up the autocalibration, you may have noticed that not all
> parameters are treated the same. Some variables, such as CN2,
> Sol_Awc, and Sol_Z are changed by percentage. In other words, since
> each HRU has a different CN value, SWAT is not replacing values, but
> modifying each CN value by 1% for example (you set the range of values
> that SWAT will use during setup). Values such as ESCO or Revapmn
> would be replaced by a value rather than modified by a percent. So
> you need to be careful when looking at your results.
>
> Check your autocalibration set up or look at documentation on
> autocalibration to see how each parameter is handled. Once you have
> figured out if your bestpar.out values are the actual value for a
> parameter, or are percentage changes, then you can go modify your
> values through Edit SWAT input, ManualCalibrationtool, or through
> the Access database. Note: remember to Re-Write SWAT Input files
> through the Edit SWAT Input menu after you've changed your parameters
> regardless of which process you use to update your parameter values!
> Best of luck!
> Regards,
> Kyle
>
> On Apr 22, 11:22 am, eben <
eben.pendle...@googlemail.com> wrote:
>
>
>
> > Hi all,
>
> > I have successfully autocalibrated flow for Alpha_bf, CN2, ESCO
> > Revapmn and Sol-Z, but am wondering how to import the calibrated
> > parameters to a new run. I tried copying all the files in the AutoCal
> > folder, and rerunning but the output.std is different.
>
> > I read on here that it is possible to change the CN2 numbers in the
> > Access database. Where is this database file and where are the CN
> > located in it? I have been changing the other parameters through Edit
> > Swat input. Is this correct?
>
> > Also where can I find the calibrated CN2 values? My bestpar.out
> > listed: 0.50661E-01-0.25000E+02 0.99997E+00 0.81381E+02 0.24921E+02. I
> > would think CN would change per land use.
>
> > Thanks for the help,
> > Eben- Dölj citerad text -
>
> - Visa citerad text -