Laszlo KREKACS
unread,Sep 16, 2013, 4:19:45 AM9/16/13Sign in to reply to author
Sign in to forward
You do not have permission to delete messages in this group
Either email addresses are anonymous for this group or you need the view member email addresses permission to view the original message
to arco...@googlegroups.com
Hi,
Seems like, I have not responded to your questions guys.
# Is the current 3.0mm diameter works with 1.75mm filament
Well it depends on the filament type. Some works, some do not work.
But afterall it is only a bandaid solution,
as the 1.75mm filament becomes 3mm inside the hotend,
so the advantage of having less molten volume disappears.
# 1.75mm version
First of all, the 1.75mm version is coming.
Now it is more a financial issue, then a technical one.
Some polishing left (mainly deciding if it should be 2mm longer or not),
but otherwise ready for manufacturing.
As you are maybe aware manufacturing a smaller diameter barrel (as is) makes it
so fragile it does not worth of building a hotend around it, but this technical
difficulty has been solved on my part.
But there is a manufacturing difficulty too,
namely I'm required to manufacture 2-300 pieces of the barrel drilled out 1.9mm,
otherwise noone is taking the job.
So the plans, drawings are ready since a long time (around june), I'm
basically saving
up money for the manufacturing.
The end user price of the barrel is expensive on the website for a reason.
# 1.75mm version is really required?
On my personal opinion it does not give much (if any) advantage.
I don't think it is the filament diameter which limits the printing quality.
But the world is moving towards the 1.75mm filament, and I'm noone to stop it.
# Is it financially viable to come out a 1.75mm version?
I don't think so, and I'm less convinced now.
To say the truth my hotend selling declined enormously.
In that perspective, I don't see a market for 1.75mm version.
It would be nice to know what is the reason (in my case).
Maybe the world moved to a complete solution (ie. complete machines),
and I'm not favored by the resellers (and I don't sell complete machines)?
Maybe there are too many others doing hotends,
and I became just one of the hundreds?
It looks to me 3D printing got mainstream,
and users are not interested in the machine itself,
but rather a complete solution.
And the technical knowledge/userbase are declining also,
we can't expect from a graphic designer to know the machine in and out.
Or simply I suck at marketing.
# Involving others in prototypes
I never really invited others into prototyping. Mainly because prototypes costs
2-3 times more then the final product (and I usually do 3 pieces to
cross-check).
And the last successful prototypes is the first "mass" produced version, so
it must leave some bitterness in someone who take the last prototype at
twice the price of the same (just mass produced) first batch.
What I occasionally did in the past (privately), is sometime gave away free some
of the prototypes, or charged normal price.
The open question to anyone here:
Are you really want to be part, financially, of the prototypes?
I never assumed so.
In future I may focus on other things, maybe the best strategy to a
small player is
to react quickly to new ideas push out roughly polished products.
The ball sticked onto a rod is basically that idea executed.
But don't fear, the 1.75mm version is coming, it is more of a prestige
question for me,
then a financial decision.
I think I was first with the all metal hotend, and I still think mine
is still the best possible.
I *need* to show the 1.75mm version and how it will look.
So stay tuned.
Best,
Laszlo