Linaro to be pushed into AM? Thoughts please.

[NTU]

Hello! I want your (yes, you) input on Linaro. Should it be the
default toolchain? What parts do you want of it to be pushed in? If
you don't want it, please state why and which parts.

Linaro looks pretty cool to me, since they fix bugs and such not in
upstream. Linaro DOES seem reliable especially since Debian arm hard
float uses Linaro.

Check out these links, tell me what you think. All is open for
discussion. I brought this up to admiral0 before in IRC but he
apparently didn't seem that excited since it uses launchpad for its
code.

https://launchpad.net/linaro-toolchain

http://www.linaro.org/downloads/

https://launchpad.net/gcc-linaro/4.5

If the community and developers of Arch Mobile approve of this, I'll
be glad to start re-building all of AM against the new toolchain (or
maybe just push the Linaro toolchain in, and leave it up to people to
compile whatever they want with linaro i.e. pacman -Sy gcc-linaro
binutils-linaro etc)

Please note that this is only an offer, and I am only asking this for
the heart of Arch Mobile.