Amarok 2.4 backported to Lucid?

2 views
Skip to first unread message

Valorie Zimmerman

unread,
Mar 2, 2011, 8:08:27 PM3/2/11
to Kubuntu Developer Discussion, amarok-devel
Hi, we've had quite a few requests for the backport of Amarok 2.4 to
Lucid. Some people prefer to stay with LTS, and yet want fewer bugs in
Amarok. One of our users tried to create a package in his PPA, but he
was unsuccessful. What shall I tell our users?

Valorie

--
http://linuxgrandma.blogspot.com
Last.fm, Facebook, Twitter, Identica, LinkedIn, Delicious: valoriez

--
kubuntu-devel mailing list
kubunt...@lists.ubuntu.com
Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/kubuntu-devel

Bart Cerneels

unread,
Mar 3, 2011, 3:18:17 AM3/3/11
to amarok...@kde.org, Kubuntu Developer Discussion, Valorie Zimmerman
On Thu, Mar 3, 2011 at 02:08, Valorie Zimmerman
<valorie....@gmail.com> wrote:
> Hi, we've had quite a few requests for the backport of Amarok 2.4 to
> Lucid. Some people prefer to stay with LTS, and yet want fewer bugs in
> Amarok. One of our users tried to create a package in his PPA, but he
> was unsuccessful. What shall I tell our users?
>
> Valorie
>
> --

An offer to package should be supported as much as possible.
Please let that user mail amarok...@kde.org so we can help.

Bart

Rohan Garg

unread,
Mar 3, 2011, 5:53:32 AM3/3/11
to Kubuntu Developer Discussion, Valorie Zimmerman, amarok...@kde.org

I'll have look at this in a few minutes in case no one has looked at this.

Rohan Garg

unread,
Mar 3, 2011, 8:41:50 AM3/3/11
to Kubuntu Developer Discussion, Valorie Zimmerman, amarok...@kde.org
Hi
So i have some more news on this, i have have package currently
building here : https://launchpad.net/~kubuntu-ppa/+archive/staging
Since i don't have a lucid machine, i could not test the package, thus
some feedback would be appreciated before i move it to the Kubuntu
Backports PPA

Regards
Rohan Garg

Valorie Zimmerman

unread,
Mar 3, 2011, 5:23:52 PM3/3/11
to Rohan Garg, Kubuntu Developer Discussion, amarok...@kde.org
You completely rock, Shadeslayer! Thanks so much for your swift and
skillful work. Our tester is very happy.

Next question - will phonon-backends besides xine be available to our
Lucid users? I understand this requires an up-to-date phonon, and vlc
1.1.1.

Backports team, what say you?

Valorie

On Thu, Mar 3, 2011 at 5:41 AM, Rohan Garg <roha...@ubuntu.com> wrote:
> Hi
> So i have some more news on this, i have have package currently
> building here : https://launchpad.net/~kubuntu-ppa/+archive/staging
> Since i don't have a lucid machine, i could not test the package, thus
> some feedback would be appreciated before i move it to the Kubuntu
> Backports PPA
>
> Regards
> Rohan Garg
>
>
>
> On Thu, Mar 3, 2011 at 4:23 PM, Rohan Garg <roha...@ubuntu.com> wrote:
>> I'll have look at this in a few minutes in case no one has looked at this.
>>
>> On 2011 3 3 13:49, "Bart Cerneels" <bart.c...@kde.org> wrote:
>>> On Thu, Mar 3, 2011 at 02:08, Valorie Zimmerman
>>> <valorie....@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>> Hi, we've had quite a few requests for the backport of Amarok 2.4 to
>>>> Lucid. Some people prefer to stay with LTS, and yet want fewer bugs in
>>>> Amarok. One of our users tried to create a package in his PPA, but he
>>>> was unsuccessful. What shall I tell our users?
>>>>
>>>> Valorie

--

http://linuxgrandma.blogspot.com
Last.fm, Facebook, Twitter, Identica, LinkedIn, Delicious: valoriez

--

Scott Kitterman

unread,
Mar 3, 2011, 6:16:18 PM3/3/11
to Kubuntu Developer Discussion
Valorie Zimmerman <valorie....@gmail.com> wrote:
You completely rock, Shadeslayer! Thanks so much for your swift and skillful work. Our tester is very happy. Next question - will phonon-backends besides xine be available to our Lucid users? I understand this requires an up-to-date phonon, and vlc 1.1.1. Backports team, what say you? Valorie On Thu, Mar 3, 2011 at 5:41 AM, Rohan Garg <roha...@ubuntu.com> wrote: > Hi > So i have some more news on this, i have have package currently > building here : https://launchpad.net/~kubuntu-ppa/+archive/staging > Since i don't have a lucid machine, i could not test the package, thus > some feedback would be appreciated before i move it to the Kubuntu > Backports PPA > > Regards > Rohan Garg > > > > On Thu, Mar 3, 2011 at 4:23 PM, Rohan Garg <roha...@ubuntu.com> wrote: >> I'll have look at this in a few minutes in case no one has looked at this. >> >> On 2011 3 3 13:49, "Bart Cerneels" <bart.c...@kde.org> wrote: >>> On Thu, Mar 3, 2011 at 02:08, Valorie Zimmerman >>> <valorie....@gmail.com> wrote: >>>> Hi, we've had quite a few requests for the backport of Amarok 2.4 to >>>> Lucid. Some people prefer to stay with LTS, and yet want fewer bugs in >>>> Amarok. One of our users tried to create a package in his PPA, but he >>>> was unsuccessful. What shall I tell our users? >>>> >>>> Valorie -- http://linuxgrandma.blogspot.com Last.fm, Facebook, Twitter, Identica, LinkedIn, Delicious: valoriez -- kubuntu-devel mailing list kubunt...@lists.ubuntu.com Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/kubuntu-devel

We'd need someone to investigate what packages (including rdepends) would be affected.

Scott K
Reply all
Reply to author
Forward
0 new messages