Has something been changed?

[Mykola Nikishov]

Hi everyone! As I can see @
http://code.google.com/p/architecturerules/updates/list there is some
activity since last September ;-)

But both mailing lists are absolutely silent. Mike, did you make any
changes in project configuration? Or is it Google's fault?

--
MAN-UANIC

[Mike Nereson]

Hey, there is my favorite Ukrainian ( : Hi Mykola.

I don't think anyone has made any changes since September. Last September I handed off the listener support off to Chris Dempsey http://code.google.com/p/architecturerules/issues/detail?id=68&colspec=ID%20Type%20Priority%20Summary%20Status%20Owner%20Component but I think he gave up on computers shortly after that. The next couple of tasks to be done are waiting on that listener support.  I will probably start implementing them soon.

I have been taking a night class since September a couple of nights a week and since then have not had any time to sit down and work on this. But I am still excited about fulfilling the 3.0 roadmap and advertising the new sites blog.architecturerules.org and wiki.architecturerules.org.

My latest thoughts have been about sonar http://sonar.codehaus.org/. I want to contact them and see if they are interested in tracking cyclic dependencies. If they are, I am hoping I can get them to use architecture rules 3.0. That would be a good motivator to get it finished.

As soon as 3.0 is out, I'd like to start implementing the xml reports for 3.1 and get the maven plugin to generate a maven report http://code.google.com/p/architecturerules/issues/detail?id=33&colspec=ID%20Type%20Priority%20Summary%20Status%20Owner%20Component.

Thoughts on those? Are you getting back into the project?

~ Mike Nereson