sonar plugin, 3.0 roadmap, level of interest
5 views
Skip to first unread message
Mike Nereson
Mar 6, 2009, 12:15:37 AM3/6/09
to architectur...@googlegroups.com
Hi guys. I don't know if any of you have discovered Sonar yet, but its a fantastic project code analysis tool. http://sonar.codehaus.org/
Tonight, I found an task that they started where they want to integrate something like Macker to do some architecture analysis for their projects. Architecture Rules is an alternative to Macker. I really like the sonar project, and I think that if we were to get a plugin with them, that it could only help our little project. I commented on the issue here. http://jira.codehaus.org/browse/SONARPLUGINS-35?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels%3Acomment-tabpanel
Please check out the issue, add your own comments if you think you could give us a better chance of being picked to fill this role.
I'd also really like to get a Hudson plugin built someday.
How are you guys doing. Ayone interested in getting back into this project? We have a few more tasks to complete before we can call 3.0 ready to go. In case you have forgotten, our road map is here... http://blog.architecturerules.org/30-roadmap/
We need to get the listeners done, so that we can output the XML. Once the XML is output, we can get into sonar, and start building the maven 2 report for the maven generated site.
At the very least, would you all mind updating me on your interest in continuing to work on this project? Thank you all.
~ Mike Nereson
Tonight, I found an task that they started where they want to integrate something like Macker to do some architecture analysis for their projects. Architecture Rules is an alternative to Macker. I really like the sonar project, and I think that if we were to get a plugin with them, that it could only help our little project. I commented on the issue here. http://jira.codehaus.org/browse/SONARPLUGINS-35?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels%3Acomment-tabpanel
Please check out the issue, add your own comments if you think you could give us a better chance of being picked to fill this role.
I'd also really like to get a Hudson plugin built someday.
How are you guys doing. Ayone interested in getting back into this project? We have a few more tasks to complete before we can call 3.0 ready to go. In case you have forgotten, our road map is here... http://blog.architecturerules.org/30-roadmap/
We need to get the listeners done, so that we can output the XML. Once the XML is output, we can get into sonar, and start building the maven 2 report for the maven generated site.
At the very least, would you all mind updating me on your interest in continuing to work on this project? Thank you all.
~ Mike Nereson
Mike Nereson
Mar 6, 2009, 6:47:11 PM3/6/09
to architectur...@googlegroups.com
The sonar guys have a public Hudson CI setup, they are hosting Architecture Rules for us
http://ci.sonar.codehaus.org/
There are failures : \
Also, every build gets output to sonar so we now have http://nemo.sonar.codehaus.org/project/index/org.architecturerules:architecture-rules-parent which gets generated after every build. Very very cool.
They are also writing to me about getting integrated into their project, which again, I think would help get our tool used a lot more.
They have some suggestions that warrant their own email. I will try to write it up and send it tonight.
~ Mike Nereson
http://ci.sonar.codehaus.org/
There are failures : \
Also, every build gets output to sonar so we now have http://nemo.sonar.codehaus.org/project/index/org.architecturerules:architecture-rules-parent which gets generated after every build. Very very cool.
They are also writing to me about getting integrated into their project, which again, I think would help get our tool used a lot more.
They have some suggestions that warrant their own email. I will try to write it up and send it tonight.
~ Mike Nereson
Reply all
Reply to author
Forward
0 new messages