Quick update

0 views
Skip to first unread message

Ananda Samaddar

unread,
Jun 29, 2010, 2:49:22 PM6/29/10
to arch-s...@googlegroups.com
Sorry for the lack of communication on this list. I'm still talking to
the Archserver.org guys about moving over to using their facilities. I
don't want to do anything more on the Security Team till this is sorted
one way or another. Once I know if we're moving or not I'll be able to
move things forward. What do you guys think about moving over to
Archsever.org? They have mailing lists and a wiki that is just like
the main Arch site, with the exception of the branding. Check them out
at www.archserver.org.

thanks,

Ananda

signature.asc

Bart Verhoeven

unread,
Jun 30, 2010, 5:28:42 AM6/30/10
to arch-s...@googlegroups.com
Op 29-06-10 20:49, Ananda Samaddar schreef:

If you could get some space on arch server that would be a good thing.
Other than that,
there's not really much to say. The fact they have a site that looks
just like arch isn't spectacular;
the arch web site code is publicly available under an open source
license. It is however a good thing
to keep the arch look, complying to the license under which they make it
available, as it's a project
affiliated with arch.

Again, a place where all the work of arch security is centralized is
very welcome, and if the arch
server project is willing to let us use their facilities, who are we to
deny such an offer.

--
Bart Verhoeven <mailto:neph...@gmail.com>
PGP Fingerprint: 0242 02FD 20F9 7121 866B 39DE 514B ACF6 55EE 338B


signature.asc

Ananda Samaddar

unread,
Jul 2, 2010, 12:05:00 AM7/2/10
to arch-s...@googlegroups.com
On Wed, 30 Jun 2010 11:28:42 +0200
Bart Verhoeven <neph...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> If you could get some space on arch server that would be a good thing.
> Other than that,
> there's not really much to say. The fact they have a site that looks
> just like arch isn't spectacular;
> the arch web site code is publicly available under an open source
> license. It is however a good thing
> to keep the arch look, complying to the license under which they make
> it available, as it's a project
> affiliated with arch.
>
> Again, a place where all the work of arch security is centralized is
> very welcome, and if the arch
> server project is willing to let us use their facilities, who are we
> to deny such an offer.
>

They didn't reply to my follow up email. I sent a message to the list
asking if what I was proposing was OK and that if I didn't hear from
anyone in 24 hours I'll assume it was not OK. I didn't hear anything,
so things are staying as they are.


---------------
Ananda Samaddar

Leader of the (Unoffical) Arch Security Team
http://groups.google.com/group/arch-security

GPG/PGP Key ID: D62D28B5
Freenode IRC nick: psychedelicious
Jabber/XMPP/MSN IDs: ana...@samaddar.co.uk

signature.asc
Reply all
Reply to author
Forward
0 new messages