CommScopeleads the way in integrating Central Office (CO) and data center innovations. Drawing from our extensive legacy in fiber optics, Hybrid Fiber-Coaxial (HFC), and copper networks, which span telecoms, cable TV providers, and wireless networks, we provide transformative solutions that enhance operational efficiency.
CommScope has collaborated with DYMO, a brand of RHINO Professional Labeling Tools and part of Newell Rubbermaid, to support the development and distribution of pre-formatted electronic templates, making the labeling of structured cabling systems easier and more efficient for installers. The new templates are compatible with the RHINO 6000 and RHINO 6500 label printers only. The electronic templates can be downloaded free of charge from the resource section of DYMO's website, and imported into RHINO CONNECT software. Label information can then be entered into the template either manually or directly from a Windows-based PC application and then printed onto labels that specifically fit CommScope structured cabling components.
CommScope has partnered with Silver Fox to utilize labeling software, label sheets and templates. The templates and functionality are specifically geared to CommScope NETCONNECT products such as patch panels, wiring/connector blocks, outlets/faceplates, and cable/patch cord labels.
I'm using 24 port cat 6 panels by Molex. I'd like to print labels for the ports rather than write in pen/pencil on the silly blank paper that Molex provides. Has anyone made a perfect template in Excel for these panels ? I've tried for ages but getting the column width accurate is driving me nuts. The perfect width I have found is .73" with a divider every 6th port of .45 px. However bloody excel will either change my .73" width to .72" or .74" which makes a difference by the time the 4th port comes along then they alignment buggers up again.
Why oh why wouldn't Molex provide a template on their website instead of giving a blank strip of paper to insert in the plastic label holder What do they think installers do? write on them? writing looks shit.
Whilst I understand your pain, there is nothing I can say but get over it! You will have to modify each and every one to suit! I actually carry an Hp mobile printer so that I can put decent labling on my work.
I use it mainly for such things as NEC Dterm labels and Panasonic key labels but I have used it for Patch strip labels (I have found this to be a messy solution as it appears you are!! I went for carrying my own portable printer because each time I loaded it onto a customer's computer and went to print it on their printer, the format would be different and so the labels wouldn't be right! I even have a Raspberry PI that I can use as a Hotspot to connect all my devices together so that I can print in this way!
For something that only a few people look at, Who cares?
Sure it doesn't look that best but factor in the amount of time you're spending to improve sometime as simple as the labeling on a patch rail.
Will take some experimenting but does your printer allow zooming on print jobs?
Otherwise how about scanning the undersized print then resize by fractions of a percent in something like
paint.net and printing out the resultant image?
Yeah but in a large corporate comms room with more than 45 patch panels thats not very acceptable. There are still record books on site as this is part of a cross connection or patch by exception system that we are converting back to a standard structured system.
You can actually get a very small tape for a Brother Ptouch labeler that is small enough to use to label even the smallest patch panel labels. I even use it for Digital telephone labels as it is small enough to get most things in! Can't remember the size but I think it is 2.5mm. Check it out for yourself!
AND/OR - set up the page in A2 (unfortunately A3 is just a tiny bit small for a full panel width)... then go to Officeworks to print. Choose a thinner paper stock, as it can be hard to slide into the channels on some panels!
The easiest way is to use a pointy tool to 'draw it in and along' the channel.
Pushing the paper in, or running your thumb along the edge often results in tears (or tears!).
The 24 Port (1U) and 48 Port (2U) PowerCat 6A Shielded Patch Panels are made from robust sheet metal. These panels are also supplied with robust removable rear cable management trays for cable strain relief and neat cable dressing. Port numbering is provided on the front and rear of the panel and individual ports may be color coded using connector icon labels for site specific network administration.
Molex recommends that the full range of PowerCat 6A Shielded products be used in a system to maximize cabling performance. This system is compliant with the latest ISO 11801 AMD 1 Class EA and TIA-568-C.2 Cat 6A for the support of 10G BASE-T.
The 24 Port (1U) and 48 Port (2U) PowerCat 6A Shielded Angled Patch Panels are made from robust 1.6mm gauge sheet metal. These panels are also supplied with robust rear cable management trays for cable strain relief and neat cable dressing. Port numbering is provided on the front and rear of the panel and individual ports may be colour coded using connector icon labels for site specific network administration. The angled design provides enhanced port access and minimises patch cord bend radius whilst also eliminating the need for horizontal cable rack mangers, and therefore frees up rack space for higher port density.
Molex recommends that the full range of PowerCat 6A Shielded products be used in a system to maximise cabling performance. This system is compliant with the latest ISO 11801 AMD 1 Class EA and TIA-568-C.2 Cat 6A for the support of 10G BASE-T.
The below files are Siemon Company product label identification templates. These files are all in Microsoft Excel format and are available for you to download. Simply click on the file of interest, save it to your hard drive and then open the file in Microsoft Excel. Once opened, you can edit the template to meet your labeling identification needs.
Important Note:
Due to variations in printer hardware and software configurations, these label templates may not be compatible with all software systems. These files were developed in Microsoft Excel V7.0a and some modifications may be necessary to properly align these files with the associated Siemon label sheets. Alignment may include adjustment of printer margins, font selection or alteration of cell dimensions (width, height). It is strongly recommended to practice on blank paper using the label sheets as guidelines to verify functionality and determine if any modification is required. If you have any questions please e-mail our Technical Support Department.
This page details the improvements included in the initial release of Altium Designer 24, as well as those added in subsequent updates. Along with delivering a range of improvements that develop and mature the existing technologies, each update also incorporates a large number of fixes and enhancements across the software based on feedback raised by customers through the AltiumLive Community's BugCrunch system, helping you continue to create cutting-edge electronics technology.
If you like what you see but are not yet a customer, why not take Altium Designer for a test drive? By filling out a simple form, you can try Altium Designer for free with 15 days of access to the full software. That's right, you will have the ability to evaluate the full Altium Designer experience with no technical limitations with unfettered access to the world's finest PCB design product. Click the link below, fill out the form, and see for yourself why more engineers and designers choose Altium than any other product available!
If a multi-part component only has primitives defined in one sub-part, the designator suffix is now hidden when that sub-part is placed on a schematic sheet. This is only for alternate display modes; the suffix is always shown for the Normal display mode. Also, it is no longer possible to select a sub-part (or alternate display mode) when that sub-part/mode has no primitives.
A new violation type has been added to the Violations Associated with Nets category on the Project Options dialog's Error Reporting tab to detect a flat design port that does not have a corresponding/matching port in any source schematic documents. The Port with no matching ports error violation will occur when there is no matching port, or a port is not connected. The default status of the violation is No Report.
This violation type will only be detected if the Net Identifier Scope option on the Options tab of the Project Options dialog is set to either Flat (Only ports global) or Global (Netlabels and ports global).
You can now choose an alternate part with no changes to a symbol on a schematic or needing to add a footprint to the PCB. In the Properties panel, enable the Do not overwrite schematic symbol and/or Do not overwrite PCB footprint options as needed, as shown in the image below. Parameters for the chosen alternate are faithfully presented in the ActiveBOM.
These parameters are included when exporting the board into Ansys EDB format. The Power Analyzer by Keysight tool also supports the Via Plating Thickness parameter. The value of this parameter is displayed in the Configuration region of the analyzer document.
When a high-speed signal passes from one reference plane to another, there should also be return vias to pass the return signals between the planes. In order to check if such a via exists within a specific distance from a signal via, the Return Path rule has been extended with a new Max Stitch Via Distance option with which you can define if a return path via should be present within a given distance (a default value is 1.5mm) from a via of the scoped signal. The return path via should provide connection to the reference layer defined in Layer Stack Manager for the corresponding impedance profile.
3a8082e126