It looks nice.
Two issues I've noticed. The first is that when increasing transparency to be able to see the chart through multi-layered airspace, primarily Class B with it's darker blue color and larger lateral footprint, the lighter blue color for Class D tends to blend into the background and is less visible. Whether this actually matters in practice is yet to be determined, but it could be a concern in congested airspace with D's near C's or a B. In my case, I was evaluating the feature at the closest Class B and had to increase transparency to read the chart. When I panned back to the nearby Class D it had very little contrast. This is a lower elevation area where the sectional is a more greenish color. Obviously this wouldn't be a problem with the brown colors of higher elevations. This effect also depends on other transparency settings, which chart is being used, etc.
The second issue is a discrepancy between the charted MOA boundary and the vector data for that airspace. Northeast of Duluth, MN (DLH) is the SNOOPY WEST MOA which has it's Southwest boundary located on a 25NMR arc from the DLH VORTAC. In this case the vector data continues along the defining radials all the way to the VORTAC. Three other nearby MOAs also have no vector data showing at all. Not sure if this is FAA supplied data or generated by another method but wanted to point it out.