Diskussion zu apml-1-0-draft-1

4 views

Skip to first unread message

Matthias Pfefferle

unread,

Dec 30, 2008, 7:05:15 AM12/30/08

to APML.Public.General

What about the <Applications /> defined in APML 0.6?

Ash Angell

unread,

Dec 30, 2008, 8:18:20 PM12/30/08

to apml-...@googlegroups.com

It most likely remain to be an optional node. This being said, I think with the extra RDF like meta-data that 1.0 provides, the need for the the applications node has pretty much been deprecated.

Ashley Angell

Faraday Media . Media 2.0 Workgroup . APML . DataPortability

Google Talk: ange...@gmail.com

Skype: ashley.angell

Contact Me:

Matthias Pfefferle

unread,

Jan 2, 2009, 6:13:18 PM1/2/09

to APML.Public.General

Do you mean rdf:about?

Reply all

Reply to author

Forward

0 new messages