bramarj opalynah brookellin
Jennifer Curtis
when I perform a seed test. I think, some result base one companying all port seed - fast speed result- but some times base on one port speed - slow speed result . so I am not sure how Palo Alto works and speed test works in my case.
When you setup an aggregate interface you're not going to suddenly have for example 20Gb on a single stream just because you aggregated two 10Gb links. The traffic is simply load-balanced between both links, but a single stream will never be able to use more bandwidth than the link it traveled.
Generally when you have split bandwidth capabilities on links its not recommended that you create an Aggregate interface, in fact if speed is physically different at the actual interface level the firewall won't even create the aggregate (You can't have a 10Gb link and a 1Gb link in the same AE).
Hopefully that makes sense, but in essence what you are doing will cause you to see the results that you are having, and that's 100% expected. Your seeing slower speeds when your stream takes the slower interface, and fast speeds when it goes out the faster interface.
As I attempted to explain above, your results are expected. When you create an aggregate interface the firewall sends each stream through a single interface, so in your end it would route through your 20MB or one of your 10MB links. You shouldn't expect to see a single stream ever go faster than 20MB since that's your fastest interface.
We currently have three very granular Power BI datasets that are used to support operations in discrete business units (Endpoint Protection : Intune + AD datasources, Education and Awareness: API + ADLS2 datasource , Access Management: AD + ADLS2 datasources). Each published Power BI dataset is complex and rather large.
I'm not sure the proposed solution actually solves your problem. Here's something I do and I haven't read anyone else talk about this possibility but to me this was an absolute game changer. Yes, you can actually combine Power BI datasets. Here's what I do:
- You have dataset A, B and C. You have created those for example in your desktop power bi, wether you build them in storage mode "Import" or "Direct Query". You upload those datasets into a Workspace in PBI service.
- You create a new dataset in the desktop. I call this a "hub" dataset: you connect with dataset A, usually this enables the "live mode" storage mode. Then you connect to another dataset and automatically the connection/storage mode is switched to Direct Query. In order to be able to connect to a second dataset you may need to enable a preview feature in settings in your desktop power bi ( I just checked and I couldn't find which was it, so it's probably no longer a preview feature you need to enable or its located somewhere else in the options menu). You can add as many datasets as you like, each one will be represented in the blocks diagram view in a different color.
- In order to create the connections between the datasets you need to be aware of which dimension tables will be governing the whole dataset to avoid chaos and ambiguity. For example you can connect the dates table of the 2 (or many) datasets or also the business unit dimension table, etc. (update: There is more explained about how this should be done on my next replyin this conversation).
- measures: measures of each dataset will be imported when you connect to the dataset. However I recommed building measures in the Hub dataset, it will allow you to group the measures in folders and don't have to go back to datasets A, B, C for measures definition etc.
- Yes, in order to update the "hub" dataset you will have to update its "sub"datasets A, B and C. Hub datasets usually take little time to be refreshed from Power BI service as all the source datasets are already in the cloud.
I would say the only drawback or risk factor involved is the inherent complexity of enlarging your dataset with more tables and measures by adding more datasets to it: You have to be very consistent on which dimensions/tables of which particular sub-dataset in your "hub" dataset are used to filter the whole "hub" dataset. For example, you might find you have multiple date tables (one per subdataset) and any of them could play the role of filtering the other date tables, but you only want to stablish this role on one dates table (always the same), and I think its best to always define single oriented filter/directionality (even if that forces you to switch from 1to1 relationship to 1 to many, Im not sure you can have single oriented directionality on on 1 to 1 relationships) with the other dates tables so that at all times the filter flows from your dimensional/ruling dates table to the others and not the other way round, which led to some trouble in some occasions.
I'd like to know how to combine three types of charts in one chart.
I'd like to make just one chart using column chart, line chart, area chart.
I've known that if overlay option , two types of charts can combine in one chart.
But I've never seen the chart that more than three types of charts are combined in one chart.
I appreciate if you give me some information.
Thank you in advance.
Have you ever created this type of chart using Custom Visualization API and Highcharts JS Library?
It seems to be very difficult.
I'm sorry to say that, Isn't there a simple other way?
(FYI, i'm using the Simple XML)
Based on your screenshot, for your current requirement see where the Simple XML Chart Configuration charting.fieldDashStyles, which is available post Splunk Enterprise 7.0, suits the need or not. Through this setting for a Line Series you can apply different stroke styles to distinguish between the series (beside color applied through charting.fieldColors).
Yes, I checked it out.
But I didn't implement to merge three types of charts yet.
For merging three charts , I need time to understand what these are.(Custom Visualization API and Highcharts JS Library)
But I'm so glad to know that merging three charts is possible,
Thank you
Custom Visualization API has a documentation to set up a bare minimal visualization i.e. Horse Shoe Meter. However, you can use the same approach to include Highcharts JS library. Splunk's Column, Line and Area charts that you are interested in are built on top of Highcharts. So, you would need a combination of both to build the same up.
hello there,
can you elaborate on the requirement? please consider that each view is powered by a single search? what is your goal? how do you envision the final outcome? a screenshot will be nice
also did you take a look at the dashboard example app?
hope it helps
Thank you for your attention.
I attached the screenshot what i want to do.
I'd like to make this type of chart in dashboard.
If I use basic option that Splunk offers , I can merge only two types of charts. (overlay option) .
I'd like to know if there is a way of utilizing html , css etc.
I think the Combine tool should be able to select more than one body as the Target Body when the operation is set to Cut. In the example below I'd like to select the 3 rectangles and cut the cylinder out. I could use Boundary fill set to intersect but that takes twice as many clicks and is not as obvious an option.
I would add this suggestion. When selecting multiple objects in a 3d program the pivot point is made to represent the groups center. Often this is what you want but I wish you had the control to snap the pivot point where ever you wanted. I don't mean only move by dragging, I mean snap to the parts of the new group.
I think there a number of areas we can improve our boolean functions. I'm changing this to future consideration as we likely won't get to this in the next year as we focus on improving the depth of our core modeling and sketch capabilities.
I've three bodies I want to cut with a fourth body. It seems I have to go through the combine function for each of the three I want cut separately. I'd like to be able to select several bodies to be cut at the same time.
I created an adobe form and sent to several clients. They filled it out and I have tried to combine them and when I do all the documents are there but they are separate docs in one file. I need ONE scrollable document with all the files one after another. I'm using Adobe DC and I'm VERY irritated and frustrated about this. Please HELP!!!!
Hi Josh! Because I'm these forms were created in Adobe when I go to combine them outside portfolio mode I get a message that basically says all the form properties will combine into one form so if I have 20 copies of the same form - only the first document information publishes and it repeats 20 times. It says I have to create in portfolio mode and when I do - all the documents are there BUT it looks like 1 page and you have to select the next document versus having all the documents in one scrollable file. The document reader says 1/1 instead of 1/70 but all 70 files are there you just have to select the next file to see it.
I see - I get what is happening and will have to follow up a bit to figure out how to get it to do what you want. Would it be possible for you to share an un-filled copy of the PDF so we could experiment a bit? If yes I'll send an email offline...
Yes, I sure can and thank you so much! I played around with Adobe DC last night and if I had created the document in DC it could track and send and do all sorts of things with the form but I created in Adobe XI and everyone has already sent their completed forms back to me. Please send me an email and I'd be happy to send my form to you. Thank you so much!!!
I understand what is happening and recall working with this a few years back. The only method I could think of is to "flatten" the form fields which makes the PDFs no longer function like a form and the fields would no longer be editable, but this may suffice...
I asked around and the best suggestion (other than flattening) I received was to use Javascript to rename the form fields (you could rename them manually using Prepare Form in Acrobat DC but it would be very labor intensive). Since the fields are "read only" to Javascript you'd actually "Duplicate" each field and it's value giving the duplicate a new name (append unique identifier) and the same value, after creating new fields the script would delete the original fields. You'd want the script to create unique names to append so that each run of the script on a new file would create a new set of names.
c01484d022