Twitter is an interesting case. Much like Google has done with Adwords, Twitter is taking a context-driven approach to the classic online advertising model.
Twitter has a very large amount of data. They could package and sell that data in any number of ways. Exposing historic analytics and filters over an API would have been one option. There are services scraping the public timeline today for products such as sentiment analysis. Twitter could have made it much simpler to provide sentiment analysis as an API mashup (at a price point).
That's just one simple example. There is great opportunity to create and enhance emerging markets around social media.
To "remain in the API business," I think a company should have a business model around APIs. This is not Twitter's strategy, as far as I can tell. However, I'm sure there's a ton of money to be made on their chosen advertising model. As far as I know, this could just be Step 1 in their monetization strategy.
Hopefully, it is. I'd love to see them succeed as part of an API economy.
--
Kevin Swiber
On Friday, September 21, 2012 at 11:15 AM, rahulkrish wrote:
Your take on platforms like Twitter moving from a potential API company to an advertisements/media based one. It's sad that services like Twitter that form a part of our digital life turning out to be just advertising platforms vying for the opportunity to sell our clickstream to advertisers. What are or What will be monetization options that such platforms have to remain in the API business than fighting for screen real-estate?