OK, here is my progress update:
In the "updates and edits" pull request:
- fixes for some typos and image issues I encountered while going through the chapters on vectors and vector-valued functions, and some later ones found while validating
- corrections to a few webwork typos (seed in the wrong place a couple of times, and at one point the URL to Alex's server showed up...)
- implicit differentiation for a function of 3 variables: in sec_multi-chain, an explanation of the result, and an example, and in the section on tangent planes, a short explanation about why the gradient gives the normal vector
- update definition of spherical coordinates to use elevation angle
- add exercise on deriving an error estimate for the integral test for series
- update and add to examples involving manipulation of Taylor series, and fix composition part of theorem
- explain convention on intervals for intervals of increase/decrease
- add new definition for concave up/down with accompanying images
- add theorem that f''(x) determines concavity (and an explanation using the MVT -- took me a minute to figure out the proof!)
- add remark on unit normal vector for lines
I will add two more items in the next hour:
- update definition of partial sums
- add exercise emphasizing notation for integration variables (from Grady)
At that point I think I'm caught up on the to-do list of edits for the summer.
Greg, please look over these changes. I'll send you new HTML if you'd rather look at that than the diffs on github.
Also Greg: please look over the preface that I added (again, you can look at the HTML once it's ready) and let me know if there are changes/additions.
Once that's done we can merge the pull request to update frontmatter.
Alex: I found one buggy webwork problem and added an issue on GitHub.
Later, two changes:
1. Add videos for the chapters on vectors and vector-valued functions. Shot those last week and just got them up on YouTube. That means we have all chapters covered.
2. Possibly adjust dimensions for Asymptote figures. I noticed that when you change the dimensions, the fonts don't scale. So a 200x200 image appears to have larger font labels than a 300x300 image. I'll look into best practice for this.